Internal Cognitive Load Differentially Influences Acoustic and Lexical Context Effects in Speech Perception: Evidence From a Population With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

被引:1
作者
Derawi, Hadeer [1 ,2 ]
Reinisch, Eva [3 ]
Gabay, Yafit [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haifa, Dept Special Educ, Haifa, Israel
[2] Univ Haifa, Edmond J Safra Brain Res Ctr Study Learning Disabi, Haifa, Israel
[3] Austrian Acad Sci, Acoust Res Inst, Vienna, Austria
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | 2023年 / 66卷 / 10期
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
PHONETIC CATEGORIZATION; TIME REPRODUCTION; ADHD; DISCRIMINATION; INFORMATION; CHILDREN; SEGMENTATION; RECOGNITION; ANXIETY; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00188
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background: To overcome variability in spoken language, listeners utilize various types of context information for disambiguating speech sounds. Context effects have been shown to be affected by cognitive load. However, previous results are mixed regarding the influence of cognitive load on the use of context information in speech perception.Purpose: We tested a population characterized by an attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to better understand the relationship between attention (or internal cognitive load) and context effects.Method: The use of acoustic versus lexical properties of the surrounding signal to disambiguate speech sounds was examined in listeners with ADHD and neurotypical listeners.Results: Compared to neurotypicals, individuals with ADHD relied more strongly on lexical context for speech perception; however, reliance on acoustic context information from speech rate did not differ.Conclusion: These findings confirm that cognitive load impacts the use of highlevel but not low-level context information in speech and imply that speech recognition deficits in ADHD likely arise due to impaired higher order cognitive processes.
引用
收藏
页码:3721 / 3734
页数:14
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
    Baayen, R. H.
    Davidson, D. J.
    Bates, D. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) : 390 - 412
  • [2] Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD
    Barkley, RA
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1997, 121 (01) : 65 - 94
  • [3] Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
    Bates, Douglas
    Maechler, Martin
    Bolker, Benjamin M.
    Walker, Steven C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01): : 1 - 48
  • [4] Trait anxiety and impoverished prefrontal control of attention
    Bishop, Sonia J.
    [J]. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 12 (01) : 92 - 98
  • [5] Speech Processing Difficulties in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
    Blomberg, Rina
    Danielsson, Henrik
    Rudner, Mary
    Soderlund, Goran B. W.
    Ronnberg, Jerker
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [6] Boersma P., 2017, PRAAT DOING PHONETIC
  • [7] Temporal contrast effects in human speech perception are immune to selective attention
    Bosker, Hans Rutger
    Sjerps, Matthias J.
    Reinisch, Eva
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [8] Spectral contrast effects are modulated by selective attention in "cocktail party" settings
    Bosker, Hans Rutger
    Sjerps, Matthias J.
    Reinisch, Eva
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2020, 82 (03) : 1318 - 1332
  • [9] Cognitive load makes speech sound fast, but does not modulate acoustic context effects
    Bosker, Hans Rutger
    Reinisch, Eva
    Sjerps, Matthias J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2017, 94 : 166 - 176
  • [10] Auditory temporal processing in children with specific reading disability with and without attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    Breier, JI
    Fletcher, JM
    Foorman, BR
    Klaas, P
    Gray, LC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2003, 46 (01): : 31 - 42