Benefits, Challenges and Research Recommendations for Social Robots in Education and Learning: A Meta-Review

被引:3
作者
Barakova, Emilia [1 ]
Vaananen, Kaisa [2 ]
Kaipainen, Kirsikka [2 ]
Markopoulos, Panos [1 ]
机构
[1] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Ind Design Dept, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Tampere Univ, Fac Informat Technol & Commun, Tampere, Finland
来源
2023 32ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION, RO-MAN | 2023年
关键词
AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1109/RO-MAN57019.2023.10309345
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Social robots exist in various forms but are still not spreading widely to the societal contexts they are envisioned for, such as educational settings. There appears to be a gap between research and practice: A lot of research already demonstrates promising results for using social robots in various domains, but this promise has yet to be realized in "the real world". The aim of this paper is to form a systematic understanding of the potential and challenges of social robots in the domain of education and learning, which is an intensively researched application domain for social robots. We conducted a meta-review of recent literature reviews (published in 2018-2022), using the PRISMA method. We analyzed 12 review papers that met the defined inclusion criteria by extracting the potential benefits and challenges presented in these reviews. We identify six benefits, five challenges, and six recommendations for future research on social robots in education and learning. These findings emphasize the potential and developments needed to realize the potential of social robots in educational contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:2555 / 2561
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Social Robot for STEM Education
    Ahmad, Muneeb, I
    Khordi-moodi, Mark
    Lohan, Katrin S.
    [J]. HRI'20: COMPANION OF THE 2020 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, 2020, : 90 - 92
  • [2] Learning and Teaching Experiences with a Persuasive Social Robot in Primary School - Findings and Implications from a 4-Month Field Study
    Ahtinen, Aino
    Kaipainen, Kirsikka
    [J]. PERSUASIVE TECHNOLOGY: DESIGNING FOR FUTURE CHANGE (PERSUASIVE 2020), 2020, 12064 : 73 - 84
  • [3] A systematic review study on educational robotics and robots
    Atman Uslu, Nilufer
    Yavuz, Gulay Ozture
    Kocak Usluel, Yasemin
    [J]. INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2023, 31 (09) : 5874 - 5898
  • [4] Social robots for education: A review
    Belpaeme, Tony
    Kennedy, James
    Ramachandran, Aditi
    Scassellati, Brian
    Tanaka, Fumihide
    [J]. SCIENCE ROBOTICS, 2018, 3 (21)
  • [5] Brown LN, 2014, INTEGR STEM EDU CONF
  • [6] Cabanillas-Carbonell Michael, 2021, E3S Web of Conferences, V229, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/202122901059
  • [7] Chu Chu S T. S T., 2022, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, V3 3, P100091, DOI [10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100091, DOI 10.1016/J.CAEAI.2022.100091, 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100091 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100091]
  • [8] Working with a Social Robot in School: A Long-Term Real-World Unsupervised Deployment
    Davison, Daniel P.
    Wijnen, Frances M.
    Charisi, Vicky
    van der Meij, Jan
    Evers, Vanessa
    Reidsma, Dennis
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI '20), 2020, : 63 - 72
  • [9] Self-initiations in young children with autism during Pivotal Response Treatmen with and without robot assistance
    De Korte, Manon W. P.
    van den Berk-Smeekens, Iris
    van Dongen-Boomsma, Martine
    Oosterling, Iris J.
    Den Boer, Jenny C.
    Barakova, Emilia, I
    Lourens, Tino
    Buitelaar, Jan K.
    Glennon, Jeffrey C.
    Staal, Wouter G.
    [J]. AUTISM, 2020, 24 (08) : 2117 - 2128
  • [10] Hein Marika, 2018, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, V62, P1083, DOI 10.1177/1541931218621249