Instrumental helping and short-term reciprocity in chimpanzees and human children

被引:2
作者
Knofe, Hagen [1 ]
Engelmann, Jan M. [2 ]
Grueneisen, Sebastian [3 ]
Herrmann, Esther [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Evolutionary Anthropol, Minerva Res Grp Origins Human Selfregulat, Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Psychol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ Leipzig, Fac Educ, Leipzig, Germany
[4] Univ Portsmouth, Ctr Comparat & Evolutionary Psychol, Dept Psychol, Portsmouth, England
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
children; chimpanzees; helping; instrumental helping; prosocial behaviour; short-term reciprocity; CONTINGENT RECIPROCITY; PAN-TROGLODYTES; EVOLUTION; FOOD; COOPERATION; STICKLEBACKS; CONSTRAINTS; ALTRUISM; BONOBOS; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1111/eth.13426
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans cooperate in reciprocal patterns, but it is unclear whether these interactions are based on the same psychological foundations. While there is evidence suggesting that both species engage in long-term forms of reciprocity, there is very little work exploring their short-term behavioural contingencies with suitable methods. Here, we present a direct comparative study on short-term reciprocity in chimpanzees and human children using a novel, low-cost instrumental helping task. We investigated whether participants help a conspecific partner to obtain a tool for accessing a reward, and whether the level of helping depends on the partner's previous helpful or unhelpful behaviour. In line with prior research, both chimpanzees and children demonstrated helping behaviour towards their partner. However, the extent to which the two species showed short-term reciprocity differed considerably. After receiving help, tested children always helped in return. They helped substantially less when interacting with an unhelpful partner. Chimpanzees showed a higher tendency to help when interacting with a helpful compared to an unhelpful partner only in the first half the experiment. With increasing trial number, chimpanzees stopped discriminating between helpful and unhelpful partners. This study provides evidence for short-term reciprocity in human children and, to a lesser extent, in our closest living relatives. Our findings demonstrate that helping paradigms provide a useful context to investigate reciprocal motives in humans and chimpanzees alike. We present the first direct comparative study on short-term reciprocity in chimpanzees (a) and human children (b). In a novel version of an instrumental helping task, subjects could press a button to help a partner access a tool. Chimpanzees and children helped. However, the extent of short-term reciprocity differed. After receiving help, children always helped in return but helped substantially less when interacting with an unhelpful partner. Chimpanzees showed similar short-term reciprocity only in the first half of the experiment.image
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION [J].
AXELROD, R ;
HAMILTON, WD .
SCIENCE, 1981, 211 (4489) :1390-1396
[2]  
Baayen RH., 2008, Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics using R, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511801686
[3]   Apes reciprocate food positively and negatively [J].
Benozio, Avi ;
House, Bailey R. R. ;
Tomasello, Michael .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 290 (1998)
[4]  
Bowles S, 2011, COOPERATIVE SPECIES: HUMAN RECIPROCITY AND ITS EVOLUTION, P1
[5]   Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) do not develop contingent reciprocity in an experimental task [J].
Brosnan, Sarah Frances ;
Silk, Joan B. ;
Henrich, Joseph ;
Mareno, Mary Catherine ;
Lambeth, Susan P. ;
Schapiro, Steven J. .
ANIMAL COGNITION, 2009, 12 (04) :587-597
[6]   A proximate perspective on reciprocal altruism [J].
Brosnan, SF ;
de Waal, FBM .
HUMAN NATURE-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY BIOSOCIAL PERSPECTIVE, 2002, 13 (01) :129-152
[7]   Bargaining in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): The Effect of Cost, Amount of Gift, Reciprocity, and Communication [J].
Bueno-Guerra, Nereida ;
Voelter, Christoph J. ;
de las Heras, Africa ;
Colell, Montserrat ;
Call, Josep .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 133 (04) :542-550
[8]   Preschool Children Fail Primate Prosocial Game Because of Attentional Task Demands [J].
Burkart, Judith Maria ;
Rueth, Katja .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (07)
[9]   Behavioral ecology: Social organization in fission-fusion societies [J].
Couzin, ID .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (05) :R169-R171
[10]   Urinary oxytocin and social bonding in related and unrelated wild chimpanzees [J].
Crockford, C. ;
Wittig, R. M. ;
Langergraber, K. ;
Ziegler, T. E. ;
Zuberbuehler, K. ;
Deschner, T. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 280 (1755)