Overcoming barriers to manufacturing digitalization: Policies across EU countries

被引:18
作者
Senna, Pedro P. [1 ,3 ]
Roca, Jaime Bonnin [2 ]
Barros, Ana C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Campus FEUP, Ctr Enterprise Syst Engn, INESC TEC, Rua Dr Roberto Frias, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Innovat Sci, POB 513, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] Univ Porto, Fac Engn, Rua Dr Roberto Frias, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
关键词
Public policy; Digitalization; Innovation; Technology adoption; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; INDUSTRY; 4.0; INNOVATION POLICY; FRAMEWORK; PROCUREMENT; CHALLENGES; SYSTEMS; FUTURE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122822
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The digital transformation of manufacturing activities is expected to bring large societal benefits in terms of productivity and sustainability. However, uptake of digital technologies is slower than desirable. As a result, governments are taking action to try to overcome some of the barriers to adoption. However, the mechanisms through which government may act are quite diverse. In this paper, we compare the national strategies across the 27 countries members of the European Union. We map each country's initiative to 14 barriers to the adoption of digital technologies in manufacturing observed in the literature. We observe that most institutional efforts focus on providing funding, developing new regulatory frameworks related to data privacy and security, and creating human capital. Some known barriers to adoption observed at the firm level, such as the lack of off-the-shelf solutions, or the need for retrofitting old equipment, are largely overlooked. We do not find any relationship between the number of initiatives proposed by each country, and the country's existing level of digitalization. We conclude by proposing several policy recommendations, as well as directions for future research.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]   From Digitization to Digital Transformation Policy Priorities for Closing the Gap [J].
Adler-Milstein, Julia .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 325 (08) :717-718
[2]  
AFD, 2021, Digital Transition Strategy 2021-2025
[3]  
Agence du Numerique, 2018, Digital Wallonia: Digital Strategy for Wallonia
[4]   Comparative analysis of blockchain technology to support digital transformation in ports and shipping [J].
Alahmadi, Dimah H. ;
Baothman, Fatmah Abdulrahman ;
Alrajhi, Mona M. ;
Alshahrani, Fatimah S. ;
Albalawi, Hawazin Z. .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2022, 31 (01) :55-69
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Digital Transformation Bible 2020-2025
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, National development strategy of the Republic of Croatia until 2030 p, P154
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Innovation Strategy of the Czech Republic 2019-2030
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Digital transformation guidelines for the year 2021-2027
[10]   The duality of digital and environmental orientations in the context of SMEs: Implications for innovation performance [J].
Ardito, Lorenzo ;
Raby, Simon ;
Albino, Vito ;
Bertoldi, Bernardo .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 123 :44-56