Priority areas and benefits of ecosystem restoration in Beijing

被引:2
作者
Wang, Wenjing [1 ]
Xu, Chao [2 ]
Li, Yuanzheng [3 ]
机构
[1] China Urban Construct Design & Res Inst Co Ltd, Beijing 100120, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Beijing Adv Innovat Ctr Future Urban Design, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[3] Henan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Resources & Environm, Zhengzhou 450046, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecosystem restoration; Priority areas; Restoration benefit; GEP; Beijing; TRADE-OFFS; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; SERVICES; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; LANDSCAPE; FOREST; IMPACTS; ENVIRONMENT; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-28255-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ecological restoration can significantly improve ecosystem services and human well-being and provide a basis for regional coordinated development and ecological security. To guide restoration efforts, information on the potential benefits of restoration was required to efficiently target investments. Although the number of studies focusing on ecosystem restoration has increased in recent decades, priority areas that integrate ecological and economic benefits have yet to be identified. We developed and applied a prioritization approach to identify potential priority sites in Beijing. We used the historical environmental data on Beijing to identify areas of degradation and to assess the feasibility of restoration. Ecosystem service and quality degradation, low ecosystem quality, and soil erosion were integrated into one index to indicate the restoration importance. Potential restoration benefits were mapped using the monetary value of six ecosystem services. Based on the importance and benefits of restoration, three scenarios were developed to identify priority restoration areas. In Beijing, restoring 30% of the degraded area (1531 km(2)) in priority areas by 2050 could increase the annual ecological benefit by more than 5 billion yuan, or approximately 787 million USD, and could decrease the ecological degradation index by 50%. By integrating explicit spatial information on restoration importance and restoration benefits, this methodology provides a feasible way to identify restoration priority areas and assess restoration benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:83600 / 83614
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ecosystem service benefits and costs of deep-sea ecosystem restoration
    Chen, Wenting
    Wallhead, Philip
    Hynes, Stephen
    Groeneveld, Rolf
    O'Connor, Eamon
    Gambi, Cristina
    Danovaro, Roberto
    Tinch, Rob
    Papadopoulou, Nadia
    Smith, Chris
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 303
  • [42] Priority areas for ecological restoration and reference sites in Chignahuapan-Zacatlan region
    Gonzalez Ovando, Maria Luisa
    Ofelia Plascencia Escalante, F.
    Martinez-Trinidad, Tomas
    MADERA Y BOSQUES, 2016, 22 (02) : 41 - 52
  • [43] Identifying Conservation Priority Areas of Hydrological Ecosystem Service Using Hot and Cold Spot Analysis at Watershed Scale
    Gwal, Srishti
    Sena, Dipaka Ranjan
    Srivastava, Prashant K.
    Srivastava, Sanjeev K.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (18)
  • [44] Integrating ecosystem service importance and ecological sensitivity to identify priority areas for ecological conservation and restoration in Miyun Reservoir Basin
    Zhang, Zhaokun
    Li, Tao
    Li, Ling
    Li, Shuang
    Rong, Yuejing
    Bao, Rui
    Fu, Xiao
    Tang, Mingfang
    Wu, Gang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2023, 30 (08) : 925 - 937
  • [45] Identification of Ecological Restoration Priority Areas Integrating Human Activity Intensity and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Wang, Hao
    Tang, Butian
    Li, Wenyi
    Zhang, Weijuan
    Liu, Jiamin
    Zhang, Liwei
    Jiao, Lei
    FORESTS, 2023, 14 (12):
  • [46] Social indicators of ecosystem restoration for enhancing human wellbeing
    Alba-Patino, Daniela
    Carabassa, Vicenc
    Castro, Hermelindo
    Gutierrez-Briceno, Ines
    Garcia-Llorente, Marina
    Giagnocavo, Cynthia
    Gomez-Tenorio, Miguel
    Cabello, Javier
    Aznar-Sanchez, Jose A.
    Castro, Antonio J.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 174
  • [47] Ecosystem restoration on Hainan Island: can we optimize for enhancing regulating services and poverty alleviation?
    Li, Ruida
    Zheng, Hua
    Polasky, Stephen
    Hawthorne, Peter L.
    O'Connor, Patrick
    Wang, Lijuan
    Li, Ruonan
    Xiao, Yi
    Wu, Tong
    Ouyang, Zhiyun
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (08)
  • [48] The need for holistic approach in the identification of priority areas to restore: a review
    Castillo-Mandujano, Jessica
    Smith-Ramirez, Cecilia
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2022, 30 (08)
  • [49] A standard framework for assessing the costs and benefits of restoration: introducing The Economics of Ecosystem Restoration
    Bodin, Blaise
    Garavaglia, Valentina
    Pingault, Nathanael
    Ding, Helen
    Wilson, Sarah
    Meybeck, Alexandre
    Gitz, Vincent
    D'Andrea, Sara
    Besacier, Christophe
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2022, 30 (03)
  • [50] Social benefits of river restoration from ecosystem services perspective: A systematic review
    Basak, Sayantani M.
    Hossain, Md Sarwar
    Tusznio, Joanna
    Grodzinska-Jurczak, Malgorzata
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2021, 124 : 90 - 100