Priority areas and benefits of ecosystem restoration in Beijing

被引:2
作者
Wang, Wenjing [1 ]
Xu, Chao [2 ]
Li, Yuanzheng [3 ]
机构
[1] China Urban Construct Design & Res Inst Co Ltd, Beijing 100120, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Beijing Adv Innovat Ctr Future Urban Design, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[3] Henan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Resources & Environm, Zhengzhou 450046, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecosystem restoration; Priority areas; Restoration benefit; GEP; Beijing; TRADE-OFFS; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; SERVICES; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; LANDSCAPE; FOREST; IMPACTS; ENVIRONMENT; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-28255-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ecological restoration can significantly improve ecosystem services and human well-being and provide a basis for regional coordinated development and ecological security. To guide restoration efforts, information on the potential benefits of restoration was required to efficiently target investments. Although the number of studies focusing on ecosystem restoration has increased in recent decades, priority areas that integrate ecological and economic benefits have yet to be identified. We developed and applied a prioritization approach to identify potential priority sites in Beijing. We used the historical environmental data on Beijing to identify areas of degradation and to assess the feasibility of restoration. Ecosystem service and quality degradation, low ecosystem quality, and soil erosion were integrated into one index to indicate the restoration importance. Potential restoration benefits were mapped using the monetary value of six ecosystem services. Based on the importance and benefits of restoration, three scenarios were developed to identify priority restoration areas. In Beijing, restoring 30% of the degraded area (1531 km(2)) in priority areas by 2050 could increase the annual ecological benefit by more than 5 billion yuan, or approximately 787 million USD, and could decrease the ecological degradation index by 50%. By integrating explicit spatial information on restoration importance and restoration benefits, this methodology provides a feasible way to identify restoration priority areas and assess restoration benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:83600 / 83614
页数:15
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]   The Darwin Agreement: A collaboration between Australian restoration organisations in support of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration [J].
Armitage, Chris ;
Auld, Tony ;
Bradby, Keith ;
Campbell, Heather ;
Clarkson, Bruce ;
Cox, Andrew ;
Dixon, Peter ;
Fitzsimons, James ;
Foran, Brendan ;
Howling, Gary ;
McLeod, Ian ;
Norrish, Shane ;
O'Connor, Patrick ;
O'Gorman, Dermot ;
Slater, Helen ;
Wrigley, Damian .
ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT & RESTORATION, 2021, 22 (03) :220-222
[2]   A world of possibilities: six restoration strategies to support the United Nation's Decade on Ecosystem Restoration [J].
Aronson, James ;
Goodwin, Neva ;
Orlando, Laura ;
Eisenberg, Cristina ;
Cross, Adam T. .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2020, 28 (04) :730-736
[3]   Ecosystem Restoration is Now a Global Priority: Time to Roll up our Sleeves [J].
Aronson, James ;
Alexander, Sasha .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2013, 21 (03) :293-296
[4]  
Aubry CA, 2011, CLIMATE CHANGE FORES, P308
[5]   Trade-offs between prosperity and urban land per capita in major world cities [J].
Bakker, Vita ;
Verburg, Peter H. ;
van Vliet, Jasper .
GEOGRAPHY AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 2 (02) :134-138
[6]   Impacts of forest cover change on ecosystem services in high Andean mountains [J].
Balthazar, Vincent ;
Vanacker, Veerle ;
Molina, Armando ;
Lambin, Eric F. .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 48 :63-75
[7]   A social-ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations [J].
Ban, Natalie C. ;
Mills, Morena ;
Tam, Jordan ;
Hicks, Christina C. ;
Klain, Sarah ;
Stoeckl, Natalie ;
Bottrill, Madeleine C. ;
Levine, Jordan ;
Pressey, Robert L. ;
Satterfield, Terre ;
Chan, Kai M. A. .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 11 (04) :194-202
[8]   Evaluating synergies and trade-offs in achieving the SDGs of zero hunger and clean water and sanitation: An application of the IEEM Platform to Guatemala [J].
Banerjee, Onil ;
Cicowiez, Martin ;
Horridge, Mark ;
Vargas, Renato .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 161 :280-291
[9]   The SEEA-Based Integrated Economic-Environmental Modelling Framework: An Illustration with Guatemala's Forest and Fuelwood Sector [J].
Banerjee, Onil ;
Cicowiez, Martin ;
Vargas, Renato ;
Horridge, Mark .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2019, 72 (02) :539-558