Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the STarT musculoskeletal tool

被引:2
作者
Karimi, Mehrnoosh [1 ,2 ]
Zahednejad, Shahla [1 ,2 ]
Negahban, Hossein [3 ,4 ]
Tajali, Shirin [5 ]
Saki Malehi, Amal [6 ]
Yadollahpour, Nava [1 ]
Shaterzadeh-Yazdi, Mohammad-Jafar [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Musculoskeletal Rehabil Res Ctr, Ahvaz, Iran
[2] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Sch Rehabil Sci, Ahvaz, Iran
[3] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Sch Paramed Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[4] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Orthoped Res Ctr, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[5] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Rehabil Inst, KITE Res Inst, Toronto, ON M4P 1E4, Canada
[6] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Fac Hlth, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Ahvaz, Iran
关键词
Pain; stratification; translation; validity; reliability; EXTREMITY FUNCTIONAL SCALE; SCREENING TOOL; PAIN; QUESTIONNAIRE; TRANSLATION; VALIDATION; QUALITY; INDEX; FORM;
D O I
10.1080/09593985.2022.2142875
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background The Subgrouping for Targeted Treatment (STarT) musculoskeletal (MSK) tool stratifies patients with MSK disorders (MSDs) into prognostic categories based on poor outcomes. Purpose This study aimed at investigating the validity and reliability of the Persian STarT MSK tool in people suffering from painful MSDs in Iran. Methods A total of 593 subjects with painful MSDs including neck, shoulder, low back, knee, and multisite pain received and completed the STarT MSK tool, visual analog scale (VAS), EuroQol five-dimensions three-levels questionnaire (EQ-5D-3 L), short form-36 health survey questionnaire (SF-36), and orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire (oMPSQ) in the first visit. To examine test-retest reliability, 234 patients completed the STarT MSK tool 2 days after the initial visit. Results In this study, 139 (23.5%), 266 (44.9%), and 188 (31.7%) participants were classified as low-, medium-, and high-risk groupings for poor outcomes, respectively. Spearman's correlation coefficient showed a strong relationship among Persian STarT MSK tool and EQ-5D-3 L (-0.78), SF-36 (-0.76), and OMPSQ (0.70). The results of known-group validity indicated that this tool could distinguish among the participants in different risk subgroups based on the scores of the oMPSQ, VAS, SF36, and EQ-5D-5 L (p < .001). No ceiling and floor effects were observed. Cronbach's alpha and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) were acceptable (0.71) and excellent (0.98), respectively. Conclusion The Persian version of STarT MSK tool has shown to be a valid and reliable instrument to stratify people with painful MSDs into low-, medium-, and high-risk subgroups based on persistent pain disability.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 394
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Brazilian version of STarT Back Screening Tool - translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability
    Pilz, Bruna
    Vasconcelos, Rodrigo A.
    Marcondes, Freddy B.
    Lodovichi, Samuel S.
    Mello, Wilson
    Grossi, Debora B.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2014, 18 (05) : 453 - 461
  • [42] Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics questionnaire
    Naseri, Navid
    Baherimoghadam, Tahereh
    Rasooli, Reza
    Hamzeh, Moein
    Merikh, Fahimeh
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2019, 17 (1) : 126
  • [43] Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the oropharyngeal Mucositis quality of life scale
    Hasheminasab, Fatemeh Sadat
    Pourpasha, Mona
    Dehghan, Azizallah
    Galousalari, Mahboubeh Yari
    Hashemi, Seyed Mehdi
    Setayesh, Mohammad
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [44] Cross-cultural translation, validity, and reliability of the French version of the Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire
    Demoulin, Christophe
    Brasseur, Pauline
    Roussel, Nathalie
    Brereton, Clara
    Humblet, Fabienne
    Flynn, Daniel
    Van Beveren, Julien
    Osinsky, Thomas
    Donneau, Anne-Francoise
    Crielaard, Jean-Michel
    Vanderthommen, Marc
    Bruyere, Olivier
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2017, 33 (11) : 880 - 887
  • [45] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire
    Erol, Erkan
    Yildiz, Ayse
    Yildiz, Ramazan
    Apaydin, Umut
    Gokmen, Derya
    Elbasan, Bulent
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (09) : E549 - E554
  • [46] Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure
    Liu, La-mei
    Liu, Ment-ting
    Sun, Meng-jie
    Wang, Jia-nan
    Lin, Bei-lei
    Wang, Peng
    Li, Qiu-fang
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [47] Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of the Spanish Version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12Sv)
    Gonzalez-de-la-Flor, Angel
    Lopez-de-Uralde-Villanueva, Ibai
    Antonio Valera-Calero, Juan
    Almazan-Polo, Jaime
    Javier Lopez-Marcos, Jose
    Fernandez-de-las-Penas, Cesar
    Garcia-Fernandez, Pablo
    Plaza-Manzano, Gustavo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (21)
  • [48] Validity and Reliability of the Persian Language Version of the Neuropsychiatry Unit Cognitive Assessment Tool
    Barekatain, M.
    Walterfang, M.
    Behdad, M.
    Tavakkoli, M.
    Mahvari, J.
    Maracy, M. R.
    Velakoulis, D.
    DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2010, 29 (06) : 516 - 522
  • [49] Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale in patients with different lower limb musculoskeletal dysfunctions
    Cankaya, Musa
    Karakaya, Ilkim Citak
    Karakaya, Mehmet Gurhan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, 2019, 26 (09) : 1 - 14
  • [50] The Functional Rating Index Reliability and Validity of the Persian Language Version in Patients With Low Back Pain
    Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin
    Feise, Ronald J.
    Naghdi, Soofia
    Ebadi, Safoora
    Yoosefinejad, Amin Kordi
    SPINE, 2011, 36 (24) : E1573 - E1577