University teachers' shifting views of successful learning environments in the future

被引:5
作者
Lundberg, Adrian [1 ]
Stigmar, Martin [2 ]
机构
[1] Malmo Univ, Dept Sch Dev & Leadership, Nordenskioldsgatan 10, S-20506 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Malmo Univ, Ctr Acad Teaching, Malmo, Sweden
关键词
Future-ready; Q methodology; learning environment; hybrid; university teaching; higher education; critical thinking; digitalization; HIGHER-EDUCATION; Q-METHODOLOGY; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1080/00313831.2022.2115127
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
University teachers are expected to continuously improve their practice, but research about their viewpoints of future-ready universities is scarce. The paper contributes to educational research through paired Q methodology and investigates university teachers' shifting views of successful future learning environments, while being forced to move to fully digital solutions due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Four pre-pandemic (January 2020) and two while-pandemic viewpoints (November 2020) are qualitatively interpreted and show that lived experiences during the pandemic led to a polarization of participants' subjective perspectives. Despite challenging conditions, university teachers view digital and distance teaching more positively, but remain skeptical concerning technologically-enhanced on-campus learning environments. Results also indicate a largely unchanged consensus regarding the importance of critical thinking and creativity. This exploratory study's results allow forward-thinking dialogues about new policies in potentially ever more hybrid learning environments with various educational stakeholders, both within the case university in Sweden and other educational institutions.
引用
收藏
页码:964 / 979
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   How are universities responding to demands for an improved learning environment? [J].
Abualrub, Iyad ;
Stensaker, Bjorn .
JOURNAL OF FURTHER AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 42 (05) :721-732
[2]   The various understandings of learning environment in higher education and its quality implications [J].
Abualrub, Iyad ;
Karseth, Berit ;
Stensaker, Bjorn .
QUALITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 19 (01) :90-110
[3]   How to analyze change in perception from paired Q-sorts [J].
Akhtar-Danesh, Noori ;
Wingreen, Stephen C. .
COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2022, 51 (16) :5681-5691
[4]  
Amhag L, 2019, Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, V35, P203, DOI [10.1080/21532974.2019.1646169, DOI 10.1080/21532974.2019.1646169, 10.1080/21532974.2019.1646169]
[5]  
Banasick S, 2019, J OPEN SOURCE SOFTW, V4, P1360, DOI [10.21105/joss.01360, 10.21105/joss.01360, DOI 10.21105/JOSS.01360]
[6]   Changes in undergraduate students' psychological well-being as they progress through university [J].
Bewick, Bridgette ;
Koutsopoulou, Gina ;
Miles, Jeremy ;
Slaa, Esther ;
Barkham, Michael .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 35 (06) :633-645
[7]  
Brew A., 2011, International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, V5, P1, DOI DOI 10.20429/IJSOTL.2011.050203
[8]   Challenges to addressing student mental health in embedded counselling services: a survey of UK higher and further education institutions [J].
Broglia, Emma ;
Millings, Abigail ;
Barkham, Michael .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE & COUNSELLING, 2018, 46 (04) :441-455
[9]  
Brown S.R., 1980, Political subjectivity: applications of Q methodology in political science
[10]   Subjectivity in the Human Sciences [J].
Brown, Steven R. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 2019, 69 (04) :565-579