Performance Assessment of Different Sustainable Energy Systems Using Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Model and Self-Organizing Maps

被引:12
|
作者
Dash, Satyabrata [1 ]
Chakravarty, Sujata [2 ]
Giri, Nimay Chandra [3 ]
Ghugar, Umashankar [4 ]
Fotis, Georgios [5 ]
机构
[1] GITAM Deemed To Be Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Visakhapatnam 530045, Andhra Pradesh, India
[2] Centurion Univ Technol & Management, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Bhubaneswar 752050, Odisha, India
[3] Centurion Univ Technol & Management, Dept Elect & Commun Engn, Bhubaneswar 752050, Odisha, India
[4] OP Jindal Univ, Sch Engn, Dept CSE, Raigarh 496109, Chhattisgarhi, India
[5] ASPETE Sch Pedag & Technol Educ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn Educators, Iraklion 14121, Greece
关键词
sustainable energy systems; multiple criteria decision analysis; pairwise rankings of all possible alternatives (PAPRIKA); self-organizing maps; MULTICRITERIA; SELECTION;
D O I
10.3390/technologies12030042
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The surging demand for electricity, propelled by the widespread adoption of intelligent grids and heightened consumer interaction with electricity demand and pricing, underscores the imperative for precise prognostication of optimal power plant utilization. To confront this challenge, a dataset centered on issue-centric power plans is meticulously crafted. This dataset encapsulates pivotal facets indispensable for attaining sustainable power generation, including meager gas emissions, installation cost, low maintenance cost, elevated power generation, and copious resource availability. The selection of an optimal power plant entails a multifaceted decision-making process, demanding a systematic approach. Our research advocates the amalgamation of multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models with self-organizing maps to gauge the efficacy of diverse sustainable energy systems. The examination discerns solar energy as the preeminent MCDM criterion, securing the apex position with a score of 83.4%, attributable to its ample resource availability, considerable energy generation, nil greenhouse gas emissions, and commendable efficiency. Wind and hydroelectric power closely trail, registering scores of 75.3% and 74.5%, respectively, along with other energy sources. The analysis underscores the supremacy of the renewable energy sources, particularly solar and wind, in fulfilling sustainability objectives and scrutinizing factors such as cost, resource availability, and the environmental impact. The proposed methodology empowers stakeholders to make judicious decisions, accentuating facets that are required for more sustainable and resilient power infrastructure.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Risk assessment for the integrated energy system using a hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making framework
    Xu, Fangqiu
    Gao, Kaiye
    Xiao, Bowen
    Liu, Jicheng
    Wu, Zixuan
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 7892 - 7907
  • [22] Assessment actions for improving railway sector performance using intuitionistic fuzzy-rough multi-criteria decision-making model
    Bouraima, Mouhamed Bayane
    Saha, Abhijit
    Stevic, Zeljko
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    Qiu, Yanjun
    Marton, Peter
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2023, 148
  • [23] Sustainability indicators for renewable energy systems using multi-criteria decision-making model and extended SWARA/ARAS hybrid method
    Ghenai, Chaouki
    Albawab, Mona
    Bettayeb, Maamar
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 146 (580-597) : 580 - 597
  • [24] Sustainability Performance Index for Ranking Energy Storage Technologies using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model and Hybrid Computational Method
    Albawab, Mona
    Ghenai, Chaouki
    Bettayeb, Maamar
    Janajreh, Isam
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2020, 32
  • [25] Optimal mapping of hybrid renewable energy systems for locations using multi-criteria decision-making algorithm
    Diemuodeke, E. O.
    Addo, A.
    Oko, C. O. C.
    Mulugetta, Y.
    Ojapah, M. M.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 134 : 461 - 477
  • [26] Metaheuristics and multi-criteria decision-making for renewable energy systems: Review, progress, bibliometric analysis, and contribution to the sustainable development pillars
    Rezk, Hegazy
    Olabi, Abdul Ghani
    Mahmoud, Montaser
    Wilberforce, Tabbi
    Sayed, Enas Taha
    AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2024, 15 (08)
  • [27] Software systems supporting remote education - Fuzzy assessment using a multi-criteria group decision-making method
    Ziemba, Pawel
    Piwowarski, Mateusz
    Nermend, Kesra
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2023, 149
  • [28] Determining prone areas to gully erosion and the impact of land use change on it by using multiple-criteria decision-making algorithm in arid and semi-arid regions
    Mokarram, Marzieh
    Zarei, Abdol Rassoul
    GEODERMA, 2021, 403 (403)
  • [29] USING A HYBRID DECISION-MAKING MODEL TO EVALUATE THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE OF HIGH-TECH LISTED COMPANIES
    Ou, Yih-Chang
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 17 (03) : 331 - 346
  • [30] Performance Evaluation of G20 Countries' Fight Against COVID-19 Using Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Geyik, Seda Karakas
    Satman, Mehmet Hakan
    Kalyoncu, Gulin
    EKOIST-JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS AND STATISTICS, 2022, (37): : 27 - 52