Weakly supervised deep learning for diagnosis of multiple vertebral compression fractures in CT

被引:5
|
作者
Choi, Euijoon [1 ]
Park, Doohyun [2 ]
Son, Geonhui [2 ]
Bak, Seongwon [3 ]
Eo, Taejoon [2 ]
Youn, Daemyung [4 ]
Hwang, Dosik [2 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Artificial Intelligence, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Vuno Inc, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Sch Management Technol, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Korea Inst Sci & Technol, Ctr Healthcare Robot, 5,Hwarang Ro 14-Gil, Seoul 02792, South Korea
[6] Yonsei Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Yonsei Univ, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Yonsei Univ, CCIDS, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Deep learning; Classification; Fractures (Compression); Spine; MANAGEMENT; NETWORKS; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-023-10394-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective This study aims to develop a weakly supervised deep learning (DL) model for vertebral-level vertebral compression fracture (VCF) classification using image-level labelled data.Methods The training set included 815 patients with normal (n = 507, 62%) or VCFs (n = 308, 38%). Our proposed model was trained on image-level labelled data for vertebral-level classification. Another supervised DL model was trained with vertebral-level labelled data to compare the performance of the proposed model.Results The test set included 227 patients with normal (n = 117, 52%) or VCFs (n = 110, 48%). For a fair comparison of the two models, we compared sensitivities with the same specificities of the proposed model and the vertebral-level supervised model. The specificity for overall L1-L5 performance was 0.981. The proposed model may outperform the vertebral-level supervised model with sensitivities of 0.770 vs 0.705 (p = 0.080), respectively. For vertebral-level analysis, the specificities for each L1-L5 were 0.974, 0.973, 0.970, 0.991, and 0.995, respectively. The proposed model yielded the same or better sensitivity than the vertebral-level supervised model in L1 (0.750 vs 0.694, p = 0.480), L3 (0.793 vs 0.586, p < 0.05), L4 (0.833 vs 0.667, p = 0.480), and L5 (0.600 vs 0.600, p = 1.000), respectively. The proposed model showed lower sensitivity than the vertebral-level supervised model for L2, but there was no significant difference (0.775 vs 0.825, p = 0.617).Conclusions The proposed model may have a comparable or better performance than the supervised model in vertebral-level VCF classification.
引用
收藏
页码:3750 / 3760
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Exploring deep learning radiomics for classifying osteoporotic vertebral fractures in X-ray images
    Zhang, Jun
    Xia, Liang
    Liu, Jiayi
    Niu, Xiaoying
    Tang, Jun
    Xia, Jianguo
    Liu, Yongkang
    Zhang, Weixiao
    Liang, Zhipeng
    Zhang, Xueli
    Tang, Guangyu
    Zhang, Lin
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [32] Weakly Supervised Deep Learning for Whole Slide Lung Cancer Image Analysis
    Wang, Xi
    Chen, Hao
    Gan, Caixia
    Lin, Huangjing
    Dou, Qi
    Tsougenis, Efstratios
    Huang, Qitao
    Cai, Muyan
    Heng, Pheng-Ann
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, 2020, 50 (09) : 3950 - 3962
  • [33] WDLS: Deep Level Set Learning for Weakly Supervised Aeroengine Defect Segmentation
    Qi, Haochen
    Cheng, Liu
    Kong, Xiangwei
    Zhang, Jiqiang
    Gu, Jianyi
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 20 (01) : 303 - 313
  • [34] Machine learning models based on CT radiomics features for distinguishing benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures in patients with malignant tumors
    Wan, Yuan
    Miao, Lei
    Zhang, HuanHuan
    Wang, YanMei
    Li, Xiao
    Li, Meng
    Zhang, Li
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2024, 65 (11) : 1359 - 1367
  • [35] Benign vs malignant vertebral compression fractures with MRI: a comparison between automatic deep learning network and radiologist’s assessment
    Beibei Liu
    Yuchen Jin
    Shixiang Feng
    Haoyan Yu
    Ya Zhang
    Yuehua Li
    European Radiology, 2023, 33 : 5060 - 5068
  • [36] Differential diagnosis of multiple vertebral compression: butterfly vertebrae
    Ozaras, Nihal
    Gumussu, Kevser
    Demir, Saliha Eroglu
    Rezvani, Aylin
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2015, 27 (11) : 3601 - 3603
  • [37] CT-guided percutaneous vertebroplasty in the therapy of vertebral compression fractures
    Vogl, TJ
    Proschek, D
    Schwarz, W
    Mack, M
    Hochmuth, K
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (04) : 797 - 803
  • [38] CT-guided percutaneous vertebroplasty in the therapy of vertebral compression fractures
    T. J. Vogl
    D. Proschek
    W. Schwarz
    M. Mack
    K. Hochmuth
    European Radiology, 2006, 16 : 797 - 803
  • [39] Weakly Supervised Deep Learning for Segmentation of Remote Sensing Imagery
    Wang, Sherrie
    Chen, William
    Xie, Sang Michael
    Azzari, George
    Lobell, David B.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (02)
  • [40] Self Paced Deep Learning for Weakly Supervised Object Detection
    Sangineto, Enver
    Nabi, Moin
    Culibrk, Dubravko
    Sebe, Nicu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 41 (03) : 712 - 725