Photon-counting versus Dual-Source CT of Congenital Heart Defects in Neonates and Infants: Initial Experience

被引:17
|
作者
Dirrichs, Timm [1 ]
Tietz, Eric [1 ]
Rueffer, Andre [2 ]
Hanten, Jens [3 ]
Nguyen, Thai Duy [2 ]
Dethlefsen, Ebba [1 ]
Kuhl, Christiane K. [1 ]
机构
[1] RWTH Aachen Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Pauwelsstr 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[2] RWTH Aachen Univ Hosp, Dept Pediat Heart Surg, Pauwelsstr 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[3] RWTH Aachen Univ Hosp, Dept Pediat Cardiol, Pauwelsstr 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.223088
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Photon-counting CT (PCCT) has been shown to improve cardiovascular CT imaging in adults. Data in neonates, infants, and young children under the age of 3 years are missing. Purpose: To compare image quality and radiation dose of ultrahigh-pitch PCCT with that of ultrahigh-pitch dual-source CT (DSCT) in children suspected of having congenital heart defects. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective analysis of existing clinical CT studies in children suspected of having congenital heart defects who underwent contrast-enhanced PCCT or DSCT in the heart and thoracic aorta between January 2019 and October 2022. CT dose index and dose-length product were used to calculate effective radiation dose. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-tonoise ratio (CNR) were calculated by standardized region-of-interest analysis. SNR and CNR dose ratios were calculated. Visual image quality was assessed by four independent readers on a five-point scale: 5, excellent or absent; 4, good or minimal; 3, moderate; 2, limited or substantial; and 1, poor or massive. Results: Contrast-enhanced PCCT (n = 30) or DSCT (n = 84) was performed in 113 children (55 female and 58 male participants; median age, 66 days [IQR, 15-270]; median height, 56 cm [IQR, 52-67]; and median weight, 4.5 kg [IQR, 3.4-7.1]). A diagnostic image quality score of at least 3 was obtained in 29 of 30 (97%) with PCCT versus 65 of 84 (77%) with DSCT. Mean overall image quality ratings were higher for PCCT versus DSCT (4.17 vs 3.16, respectively; P <.001). SNR and CNR were higher for PCCT versus DSCT with SNR (46.3 +/- 16.3 vs 29.9 +/- 15.3, respectively; P =.007) and CNR (62.0 +/- 50.3 vs 37.2 +/- 20.8, respectively; P =.001). Mean effective radiation doses were similar for PCCT and DSCT (0.50 mSv vs 0.52 mSv; P =.47). Conclusion: At a similar radiation dose, PCCT offers a higher SNR and CNR and thus better cardiovascular imaging quality than DSCT in children suspected of having cardiac heart defects.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High Temporal Resolution Dual-Source Photon-Counting CT for Coronary Artery Disease: Initial Multicenter Clinical Experience
    Soschynski, Martin
    Hagen, Florian
    Baumann, Stefan
    Hagar, Muhammad Taha
    Weiss, Jakob
    Krauss, Tobias
    Schlett, Christopher L.
    von zur Muehlen, Constantin
    Bamberg, Fabian
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Greulich, Simon
    Froelich, Matthias F.
    Riffel, Philipp
    Overhoff, Daniel
    Papavassiliu, Theano
    Schoenberg, Stefan O.
    Faby, Sebastian
    Ulzheimer, Stefan
    Ayx, Isabelle
    Krumm, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (20)
  • [2] Consistency of spectral results in cardiac dual-source photon-counting CT
    Liu, Leening P.
    Shapira, Nadav
    Sahbaee, Pooyan
    Gang, Grace J.
    Knollman, Friedrich D.
    Chen, Marcus Y.
    Litt, Harold I.
    Noel, Peter B.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [3] Consistency of spectral results in cardiac dual-source photon-counting CT
    Leening P. Liu
    Nadav Shapira
    Pooyan Sahbaee
    Grace J. Gang
    Friedrich D. Knollman
    Marcus Y. Chen
    Harold I. Litt
    Peter B. Noël
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [4] Quantitative assessment of motion effects in dual-source dual-energy CT and dual-source photon-counting detector CT
    Ahmed, Zaki
    Rajendran, Kishore
    Gong, Hao
    McCollough, Cynthia
    Leng, Shuai
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2022: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2022, 12031
  • [5] Reproducibility of coronary artery calcium quantification on dual-source CT and dual-source photon-counting CT: a dynamic phantom study
    van der Werf, Niels R.
    Booij, Ronald
    Greuter, Marcel J. W.
    Bos, Daniel
    van der Lugt, A.
    Budde, R. P. J.
    van Straten, Marcel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2022, 38 (07): : 1613 - 1619
  • [6] Dual-Source CT in Congenital Heart Disease
    Ruehm, S.
    Lohan, D.
    Krishnam, M.
    Panknin, C.
    Lell, M. M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (05)
  • [7] Multi-energy CT imaging for large patients using dual-source photon-counting detector CT
    Tao, Shengzhen
    Marsh, Jeffrey F.
    Tao, Ashley
    Michalak, Greg J.
    Rajendran, Kishore
    McCollough, Cynthia H.
    Leng, Shuai
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (17):
  • [8] Image Quality Analysis of Photon-Counting CT Compared with Dual-Source CT: A Phantom Study for Chest CT Examinations
    Deleu, Marine
    Maurice, Jean-Baptiste
    Devos, Laura
    Remy, Martine
    Dubus, Francois
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (07)
  • [9] Dual-contrast agent photon-counting computed tomography of the heart: initial experience
    Rolf Symons
    Tyler E. Cork
    Manu N. Lakshmanan
    Robert Evers
    Cynthia Davies-Venn
    Kelly A. Rice
    Marvin L. Thomas
    Chia-Ying Liu
    Steffen Kappler
    Stefan Ulzheimer
    Veit Sandfort
    David A. Bluemke
    Amir Pourmorteza
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2017, 33 : 1253 - 1261
  • [10] Dual-contrast agent photon-counting computed tomography of the heart: initial experience
    Symons, Rolf
    Cork, Tyler E.
    Lakshmanan, Manu N.
    Evers, Robert
    Davies-Venn, Cynthia
    Rice, Kelly A.
    Thomas, Marvin L.
    Liu, Chia-Ying
    Kappler, Steffen
    Ulzheimer, Stefan
    Sandfort, Veit
    Bluemke, David A.
    Pourmorteza, Amir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2017, 33 (08): : 1253 - 1261