Stock price reactions to the climate activism by Fridays for Future: The roles of public attention and environmental performance

被引:10
作者
Schuster, Mario [1 ]
Bornhoft, Sophie Constance [1 ]
Lueg, Rainer [1 ,2 ]
Bouzzine, Yassin Denis [1 ]
机构
[1] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Inst Management Accounting & Finance, Univ allee 1, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Business & Econ, Univ Pk 1, DK-6000 Kolding, Denmark
关键词
Stakeholder activism; Climate change; Green transition; Social movement; Climate risk; Stock performance; INSTITUTIONAL EMERGENCE; STAKEHOLDER PRESSURES; RISK PERCEPTIONS; SOCIAL-MOVEMENTS; PROCESS MODEL; EVENT; IMPACT; RESPONSIBILITY; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118608
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This research investigates how the European and U.S. stock markets reacted to the upheaval caused by Fridays for Future. We perform an event study on stocks listed in the Stoxx Europe 600 and S & P 500 to examine their price reactions to the Global Climate Strikes 1-11. We analyze the significance of abnormal stock returns utilizing three event windows covering anticipation, short-term, and lagged effects. We also divide the sample by environmental performance grades. Our findings reveal that climate activism significantly affected stock valuation for all 11 Global Climate Strikes. Superior environmental performance is comparatively beneficial for firm values when climate activism receives a high level of public attention. We identify differences in the market reactions between Europe and the U.S. Also, we enrich the literature on stock market reactions by demonstrating that investors react, not only to primary stakeholder events (i.e., enactment of regulations by governments) but also to secondary stakeholder pressure (i.e., NGO activism). Furthermore, we provide evidence that climate activism has a processual character that causes recurring effects on the stock market. Our study encourages policymakers to increase environmental pressure as a mechanism for guiding green transformation.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 161 条
  • [31] Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective
    Buysse, K
    Verbeke, A
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (05) : 453 - 470
  • [32] Stakeholder pressures and corporate climate change mitigation strategies
    Cadez, Simon
    Czerny, Albert
    Letmathe, Peter
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 28 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [33] The finance of climate change
    Calvet, Laurent
    Gianfrate, Gianfranco
    Uppal, Raman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2022, 73
  • [34] Multi-country event-study methods
    Campbell, Cynthia J.
    Cowan, Arnold R.
    Salotti, Valentina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2010, 34 (12) : 3078 - 3090
  • [35] Analysis of the effectiveness of the first European Pollutant Emission Register (EPER)
    Canon-de-Francia, Joaquin
    Garces-Ayerbe, Concepcion
    Ramirez-Aleson, Marisa
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 67 (01) : 83 - 92
  • [36] Air pollutant taxation: an empirical survey
    Cansier, D
    Krumm, R
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 23 (01) : 59 - 70
  • [37] Civil disobedience by scientists helps press for urgent climate action
    Capstick, Stuart
    Thierry, Aaron
    Cox, Emily
    Berglund, Oscar
    Westlake, Steve
    Steinberger, Julia K.
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2022, 12 (09) : 773 - 774
  • [38] Government Engagement, Environmental Policy, and Environmental Performance: Evidence from the Most Polluting Chinese Listed Firms
    Chang, Li
    Li, Wenjing
    Lu, Xiaoyan
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 24 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [39] Attention to Global Warming
    Choi, Darwin
    Gao, Zhenyu
    Jiang, Wenxi
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2020, 33 (03) : 1112 - 1145
  • [40] Does Workforce Diversity Matter in the Fight against Climate Change? An Analysis of Fortune 500 Companies
    Ciocirlan, Cristina
    Pettersson, Caroline
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 19 (01) : 47 - 62