Stock price reactions to the climate activism by Fridays for Future: The roles of public attention and environmental performance

被引:10
作者
Schuster, Mario [1 ]
Bornhoft, Sophie Constance [1 ]
Lueg, Rainer [1 ,2 ]
Bouzzine, Yassin Denis [1 ]
机构
[1] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Inst Management Accounting & Finance, Univ allee 1, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Business & Econ, Univ Pk 1, DK-6000 Kolding, Denmark
关键词
Stakeholder activism; Climate change; Green transition; Social movement; Climate risk; Stock performance; INSTITUTIONAL EMERGENCE; STAKEHOLDER PRESSURES; RISK PERCEPTIONS; SOCIAL-MOVEMENTS; PROCESS MODEL; EVENT; IMPACT; RESPONSIBILITY; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118608
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This research investigates how the European and U.S. stock markets reacted to the upheaval caused by Fridays for Future. We perform an event study on stocks listed in the Stoxx Europe 600 and S & P 500 to examine their price reactions to the Global Climate Strikes 1-11. We analyze the significance of abnormal stock returns utilizing three event windows covering anticipation, short-term, and lagged effects. We also divide the sample by environmental performance grades. Our findings reveal that climate activism significantly affected stock valuation for all 11 Global Climate Strikes. Superior environmental performance is comparatively beneficial for firm values when climate activism receives a high level of public attention. We identify differences in the market reactions between Europe and the U.S. Also, we enrich the literature on stock market reactions by demonstrating that investors react, not only to primary stakeholder events (i.e., enactment of regulations by governments) but also to secondary stakeholder pressure (i.e., NGO activism). Furthermore, we provide evidence that climate activism has a processual character that causes recurring effects on the stock market. Our study encourages policymakers to increase environmental pressure as a mechanism for guiding green transformation.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 161 条
  • [91] Law and finance
    La Porta, R
    Lopez-de-Silanes, F
    Shleifer, A
    Vishny, RW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1998, 106 (06) : 1113 - 1155
  • [92] Antecedents of Adopting Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Green Practices
    Lee, Jung Wan
    Kim, Young Min
    Kim, Young Ei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2018, 148 (02) : 397 - 409
  • [93] Leonhardt D., 2014, N Y TIMES 0507
  • [94] Climate transition risk and bank performance:Evidence from China
    Li, Shouwei
    Pan, Zhilei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 323
  • [95] Does stakeholder pressure influence corporate GHG emissions reporting? Empirical evidence from Europe
    Liesen, Andrea
    Hoepner, Andreas G.
    Patten, Dennis M.
    Figge, Frank
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2015, 28 (07): : 1047 - 1074
  • [96] Climate Change and Financial Market Efficiency
    Liesen, Andrea
    [J]. BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2015, 54 (04) : 511 - 539
  • [97] Lorente J.J. Cespedes., 2003, SCAND J MANAG, V19, P333, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0956-5221(02)00034-9
  • [98] A Holistic Perspective on Corporate Sustainability Drivers
    Lozano, Rodrigo
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 22 (01) : 32 - 44
  • [99] Bidirectional effects between organizational sustainability disclosure and risk
    Lueg, Klarissa
    Krastev, Boris
    Lueg, Rainer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 229 : 268 - 277
  • [100] MacKinlay AC, 1997, J ECON LIT, V35, P13