Trocar localisation for robot-assisted vitreoretinal surgery

被引:3
|
作者
Birch, Jeremy [1 ]
Da Cruz, Lyndon [2 ]
Rhode, Kawal [1 ]
Bergeles, Christos [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Sch Biomed Engn & Imaging Sci, London WC2R 2LS, England
[2] Moorfields Eye Hosp, 162 City Rd, London EC1V 2PD, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Robotics; Eye-surgery; Trocar; Localisation; ArUco; Aurora; REMOTE CENTER;
D O I
10.1007/s11548-023-02987-y
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
PurposeRobot-assisted vitreoretinal surgery provides precise and consistent operations on the back of the eye. To perform this safely, knowledge of the surgical instrument's remote centre of motion (RCM) and the location of the insertion point into the eye (trocar) is required. This enables the robot to align both positions to pivot the instrument about the trocar, thus preventing any damaging lateral forces from being exerted.MethodsBuilding on a system developed in previous work, this study presents a trocar localisation method that uses a micro-camera mounted on a vitreoretinal surgical forceps, to track two ArUco markers attached on either side of a trocar. The trocar position is the estimated midpoint between the markers.ResultsExperimental evaluation of the trocar localisation was conducted. Results showed an RMSE of 1.82 mm for the localisation of the markers and an RMSE of 1.24 mm for the trocar localisation.ConclusionsThe proposed camera-based trocar localisation presents reasonable consistency and accuracy and shows improved results compared to other current methods. Optimum accuracy for this application would necessitate a 1.4 mm absolute error margin, which corresponds to the trocar's radius. The trocar localisation results are successfully found within this margin, yet the marker localisation would require further refinement to ensure consistency of localisation within the error margin. Further work will refine these position estimates and ensure the error stays consistently within this boundary.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 198
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience
    F. Corcione
    C. Esposito
    D. Cuccurullo
    A. Settembre
    N. Miranda
    F. Amato
    F. Pirozzi
    P. Caiazzo
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2005, 19 : 117 - 119
  • [42] Current Use of and Indications for Robot-assisted Surgery in Paediatric Urology
    Subramaniam, Ramnath
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2018, 4 (05): : 662 - 664
  • [43] Robot-assisted single-port surgery for mediastinal tumors
    Ishikawa, Norihiko
    Oda, Makoto
    Kawachi, Kenji
    Watanabe, Go
    SURGERY TODAY, 2019, 49 (01) : 96 - 98
  • [44] Initial Experience of Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy with Hugo Robot-Assisted Surgery System: Step-by-Step Description of Two Different Techniques
    Piro, Adele
    Piramide, Federico
    Balestrazzi, Eleonora
    Paciotti, Marco
    Bravi, Carlo Andrea
    Peraire Lores, Maria
    Sorce, Gabriele
    Ticonosco, Marco
    Frego, Nicola
    Rebuffo, Silvia
    Colla-Ruvolo, Claudia
    Inferrera, Antonio
    De Naeyer, Geert
    De Groote, Ruben
    Greco, Francesco
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2023, 37 (09) : 1021 - 1027
  • [45] Robot-Assisted Image-Guided Interventions
    Unger, Michael
    Berger, Johann
    Melzer, Andreas
    FRONTIERS IN ROBOTICS AND AI, 2021, 8
  • [46] Experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the lower ureteral segment in adults
    Musch, Michael
    Loewen, Heinrich
    Davoudi, Yadollah
    Yanovskiy, Maxim
    Hohenhorst, Jan Lukas
    Vanberg, Michaela
    Kroepfl, Darko
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2012, 6 (03) : 223 - 230
  • [47] Assessing the complications of laparoscopic robot-assisted surgery: the case of radical prostatectomy
    Thierry Lebeau
    Morgan Rouprêt
    Karim Ferhi
    Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler
    François Richard
    Marc-Olivier Bitker
    Christophe Vaessen
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 536 - 542
  • [48] Experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the lower ureteral segment in adults
    Michael Musch
    Heinrich Loewen
    Yadollah Davoudi
    Maxim Yanovskiy
    Jan Lukas Hohenhorst
    Michaela Vanberg
    Darko Kroepfl
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2012, 6 (3) : 223 - 230
  • [49] Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after previous cancer surgery
    Kim K.H.
    Lorenzo E.I.S.
    Jeong W.
    Oh C.K.
    Yu H.S.
    Rha K.H.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2010, 3 (4) : 223 - 227
  • [50] Comparative analysis of resection tools suited for transoral robot-assisted surgery
    Thomas K. Hoffmann
    Patrick J. Schuler
    Agnes Bankfalvi
    Jens Greve
    Lukas Heusgen
    Stephan Lang
    Stefan Mattheis
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2014, 271 : 1207 - 1213