Dynamic Split Tensile Strength of Basalt, Granite, Marble and Sandstone: Strain Rate Dependency and Fragmentation

被引:16
作者
Padmanabha, Vivek [1 ,2 ]
Schafer, Frank [1 ,2 ]
Rae, Auriol S. P. [3 ]
Kenkmann, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst High Speed Dynam Ernst Mach Inst, Ernst Zermelo Str 4, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Albert Ludwigs Univ Freiburg, Inst Earth & Environm SciencesGeol, Albertstr 23b, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Earth Sci, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, England
关键词
SHPB; Flattened Brazilian disc; Dynamic tensile strength; Fragment size; FLATTENED BRAZILIAN DISC; BRITTLE MATERIALS; STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY; FRACTURE-TOUGHNESS; ELASTIC-MODULUS; ROSIN-RAMMLER; ROCK; SIZE; PULVERIZATION; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1007/s00603-022-03075-4
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to understand the strength behaviour and fragment size of rocks during indirect, quasi-static and dynamic tensile tests. Four rocks with different lithological characteristics, namely: basalt, granite, sandstone, and marble were selected for this study. Brazilian disc experiments were performed over a range of strain rates from similar to 10(-5)/s to 2.7 x 10(1)/s using a hydraulic loading frame and a split Hopkinson bar. Over the range of strain rates, our measurements of dynamic strength increase are in good agreement with the universal theoretical scaling relationship of (Kimberley et al., Acta Mater 61:3509-3521, 2013). Dynamic fragmentation during split tension mode failure has received little attention, and in the present study, we determine the fragment size distribution based on the experimentally fragmented specimens. The fragments fall into two distinct groups based on the nature of failure: coarser primary fragments, and finer secondary fragments. The degree of fragmentation is assessed in terms of characteristic strain rate and is compared with existing theoretical tensile fragmentation models. The average size of the secondary fragments has a strong strain rate dependency over the entire testing range, while the primary fragment size is less sensitive at lower strain rates. Marble and sandstone are found to generate more pulverised secondary debris when compared to basalt and granite. Furthermore, the mean fragment sizes of primary and secondary fragments are well described by a power-law function of strain rate.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 128
页数:20
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] Aadnoy B, 2011, PETROLEUM ROCK MECHANICS: DRILLING OPERATIONS AND WELL DESIGN, P1
  • [2] Dynamic fracturing by successive coseismic loadings leads to pulverization in active fault zones
    Aben, F. M.
    Doan, M. -L.
    Mitchell, T. M.
    Toussaint, R.
    Reuschle, T.
    Fondriest, M.
    Gratier, J. -P.
    Renard, F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2016, 121 (04) : 2338 - 2360
  • [3] [Anonymous], 927632008 ISO
  • [4] DERIVATION OF THE WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION BASED ON PHYSICAL PRINCIPLES AND ITS CONNECTION TO THE ROSIN-RAMMLER AND LOGNORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS
    BROWN, WK
    WOHLETZ, KH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1995, 78 (04) : 2758 - 2763
  • [5] Fracture Initiation and Propagation in a Brazilian Disc with a Plane Interface: a Numerical Study
    Cai, M.
    [J]. ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2013, 46 (02) : 289 - 302
  • [6] Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials
    Camacho, GT
    Ortiz, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 1996, 33 (20-22) : 2899 - 2938
  • [7] Chen WNW, 2011, MECH ENG SER, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7982-7
  • [8] Modelling fragment size distribution using two-parameter Weibull equation
    Cheong, YS
    Reynolds, GK
    Salman, AD
    Hounslow, MJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINERAL PROCESSING, 2004, 74 : S227 - S237
  • [9] Rock fragmentation control in blasting
    Cho, SH
    Kaneko, K
    [J]. MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS, 2004, 45 (05) : 1722 - 1730
  • [10] Some Fundamental Issues in Dynamic Compression and Tension Tests of Rocks Using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar
    Dai, Feng
    Huang, Sheng
    Xia, Kaiwen
    Tan, Zhuoying
    [J]. ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2010, 43 (06) : 657 - 666