Quality checkpoints in the MRI-directed prostate cancer diagnostic pathway

被引:42
作者
Barrett, Tristan [1 ,2 ]
de Rooij, Maarten [3 ]
Giganti, Francesco [4 ,5 ]
Allen, Clare [4 ]
Barentsz, Jelle O. [3 ]
Padhani, Anwar R. [6 ]
机构
[1] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge, England
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Med Imaging, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, London, England
[5] UCL, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London, England
[6] Mt Vernon Hosp, Paul Strickland Scanner Ctr, Northwood, Middx, England
关键词
TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND FUSION; PI-RADS V2; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; TRANSPERINEAL BIOPSY; UROLOGISTS NEED; TARGETED BIOPSY; GUIDED BIOPSY; IMAGE QUALITY; IN-BORE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1038/s41585-022-00648-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Multiparametric MRI of the prostate is now recommended as the initial diagnostic test for men presenting with suspected prostate cancer, with a negative MRI enabling safe avoidance of biopsy and a positive result enabling MRI-directed sampling of lesions. The diagnostic pathway consists of several steps, from initial patient presentation and preparation to performing and interpreting MRI, communicating the imaging findings, outlining the prostate and intra-prostatic target lesions, performing the biopsy and assessing the cores. Each component of this pathway requires experienced clinicians, optimized equipment, good inter-disciplinary communication between specialists, and standardized workflows in order to achieve the expected outcomes. Assessment of quality and mitigation measures are essential for the success of the MRI-directed prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Quality assurance processes including Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System, template biopsy, and pathology guidelines help to minimize variation and ensure optimization of the diagnostic pathway. Quality control systems including the Prostate Imaging Quality scoring system, patient-level outcomes (such as Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System MRI score assignment and cancer detection rates), multidisciplinary meeting review and audits might also be used to provide consistency of outcomes and ensure that all the benefits of the MRI-directed pathway are achieved. In this Review, the authors analyse all the steps of the multiparametric MRI-guided prostate cancer diagnostic pathway, focusing on quality assurance systems to minimize variation in performance and discussing quality control measures to assess and mitigate poor quality throughout the process.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 22
页数:14
相关论文
共 161 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater
    Brown, Louise C.
    Gabe, Rhian
    Kaplan, Richard
    Parmar, Mahesh K.
    Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda
    Ward, Katie
    Hindley, Richard G.
    Freeman, Alex
    Kirkham, Alex P.
    Oldroyd, Robert
    Parker, Chris
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) : 815 - 822
  • [2] Interactive dedicated training curriculum improves accuracy in the interpretation of MR imaging of prostate cancer
    Akin, Oguz
    Riedl, Christopher C.
    Ishill, Nicole M.
    Moskowitz, Chaya S.
    Zhang, Jingbo
    Hricak, Hedvig
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (04) : 995 - 1002
  • [3] Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: Urologic pathologists
    Allsbrook, WC
    Mangold, KA
    Johnson, MH
    Lane, RB
    Lane, CG
    Amin, MB
    Bostwick, DG
    Humphrey, PA
    Jones, EC
    Reuter, VE
    Sakr, W
    Sesterhenn, IA
    Troncoso, P
    Wheeler, TM
    Epstein, JI
    [J]. HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2001, 32 (01) : 74 - 80
  • [5] National implementation of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection - recommendations from a UK consensus meeting
    Appayya, Mrishta Brizmohun
    Adshead, Jim
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Allen, Clare
    Bainbridge, Alan
    Barrett, Tristan
    Giganti, Francesco
    Graham, John
    Haslam, Phil
    Johnston, Edward W.
    Kastner, Christof
    Kirkham, Alexander P. S.
    Lipton, Alexandra
    McNeill, Alan
    Moniz, Larissa
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Nabi, Ghulam
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Parker, Chris
    Patel, Amit
    Pursey, Jacqueline
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Staffurth, John
    van der Meulen, Jan
    Walls, Darren
    Punwani, Shonit
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (01) : 13 - 25
  • [6] Rectal preparation significantly improves prostate imaging quality: Assessment of the PI-QUAL score with visual grading characteristics
    Arnoldner, Michael A.
    Polanec, Stephan H.
    Lazar, Mathias
    Khadjavi, Sam Noori
    Clauser, Paola
    Poetsch, Nina
    Schwarz-Nemec, Ursula
    Korn, Stephan
    Huebner, Nicolai
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Baltzer, Pascal A. T.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 147
  • [7] ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Clements, Richard
    Choyke, Peter
    Verma, Sadhna
    Villeirs, Geert
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Logager, Vibeke
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 746 - 757
  • [8] PI-RADS version 2.1: one small step for prostate MRI
    Barrett, T.
    Rajesh, A.
    Rosenkrantz, A. B.
    Choyke, P. L.
    Turkbey, B.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (11) : 841 - 852
  • [9] PI-RADS version 2: what you need to know
    Barrett, T.
    Turkbey, B.
    Choyke, P. L.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 70 (11) : 1165 - 1176
  • [10] Prostate MRI Qualification: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review
    Barrett, Tristan
    Ghafoor, Soleen
    Gupta, Rajan T.
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Muglia, Valdair F.
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Purysko, Andrei S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 219 (05) : 691 - 702