Could green finance facilitate low-carbon transformation of power generation? Some evidence from China

被引:15
作者
Lin, Ziqiang [1 ]
Liao, Xianchun [2 ]
Jia, Haoran [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jinan, Business Sch, Jinan, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Jinan, Longshan Green Econ Ctr, Inst Green Dev, Business Sch, Jinan, Peoples R China
关键词
Green finance; Low-carbon transformation; Power generation; GMM and DID methods; China; RENEWABLE ENERGY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; EMISSIONS; GROWTH; SECTOR; INVESTMENT; IMPACTS; CLIMATE; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1108/IJCCSM-03-2022-0039
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose The decarbonization of power generation is key to achieving carbon neutrality in China by the end of 2060. This paper aims to examine how green finance influences China's low-carbon transition of power generation. Using a provincial panel data set as an empirical study example, green finance is assessed first, then empirically analyses the influences of green finance on the low-carbon transition of power generation, as well as intermediary mechanisms at play. Finally, this paper makes relevant recommendations for peak carbon and carbon neutrality in China. Design/methodology/approach To begin with, an evaluation index system with five indicators is constructed with entropy weighting method. Second, this paper uses the share of coal-fired power generation that takes in total power generation as an inverse indicator to measure the low-carbon transition in power generation. Finally, the authors perform generalized method of moments (GMM) econometric model to examine how green finance influences China's low-carbon transition of power generation by taking advantage of 30 provincial panel data sets, spanning the period of 2007-2019. Meanwhile, the implementation of the 2016 Guidance on Green Finance is used as a turning point to address endogeneity using difference-in-difference method (DID). Findings The prosperity of green finance can markedly reduce the share of thermal power generation in total electricity generation, which implies a trend toward China's low-carbon transformation in the power generation industry. Urbanization and R&D investment are driving forces influencing low-carbon transition, while economic development hinders the low-carbon transition. The conclusions remain robust after a series of tests such as the DID method, instrumental variable method and replacement indicators. Notably, the results of the mechanism analysis suggest that green finance contributes to low-carbon transformation in power generation by reducing secondary sectoral share, reducing the production of export products, promoting the advancement of green technologies and expanding the proportion of new installed capacity of renewable energy. Research limitations/implications This paper puts forward relevant suggestions for promoting the green finance development with countermeasures such as allowing low interest rate for renewable energy power generation, facilitating market function and using carbon trade market. Additional policy implication is to promote high quality urbanization and increase R&D investment while pursuing high quality economic development. The last implication is to develop mechanism to strengthen the transformation of industrial structure, to promote high quality trade from high carbon manufactured products to low-carbon products, to stimulate more investment in green technology innovation and to accelerate the greening of installed structure in power generation industry. Originality/value This paper first attempts to examine the low-carbon transition in power generation from a new perspective of green finance. Second, this paper analyses the mechanism through several aspects: the share of secondary industry, the output of exported products, advances in green technology and the share of renewable energy in new installed capacity, which has not yet been done. Finally, this study constructs a system of indicators to evaluate green finance, including five indicators with entropy weighting method. In conclusion, this paper provides scientific references for sustainable development in China, and meanwhile for other developing countries with similar characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 158
页数:18
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   The Environment and Directed Technical Change [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Aghion, Philippe ;
Bursztyn, Leonardo ;
Hemous, David .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) :131-166
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Managing the global commons: the economics of climate change
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Green Finance: Actors, Challenges and Policy Recommendations
[4]   Power sector investment risk and renewable energy: A Japanese case study using portfolio risk optimization method [J].
Bhattacharya, Anindya ;
Kojima, Satoshi .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 40 :69-80
[5]   Enlarging the Contracting Space: Collateral Menus, Access to Credit, and Economic Activity [J].
Campello, Murillo ;
Larrain, Mauricio .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2016, 29 (02) :349-383
[6]   Bank climate actions and their implications for the coal power sector [J].
Chan, Hoy-Yen ;
Merdekawati, Monika ;
Suryadi, Beni .
ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2022, 39
[7]   Bridging funding gaps for climate and sustainable development: Pitfalls, progress and potential of private finance [J].
Clark, Robyn ;
Reed, James ;
Sunderland, Terry .
LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 71 :335-346
[8]   Applying portfolio theory to the electricity sector: Energy versus power [J].
Delarue, Erik ;
De Jonghe, Cedric ;
Belmans, Ronnie ;
D'haeseleer, William .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (01) :12-23
[9]   Why do some countries receive more international financing for coal-fired power plants than renewables? Influencing factors in 23 countries [J].
Edianto, Achmed ;
Trencher, Gregory ;
Matsubae, Kazuyo .
ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 66 :177-188
[10]   Environmental decentralization, digital finance and green technology innovation [J].
Feng, Suling ;
Zhang, Rong ;
Li, Guoxiang .
STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2022, 61 :70-83