'But I don't know if I want to talk to you': strategies to foster conversational receptiveness across the United States' political divide

被引:6
作者
Oliver-Blackburn, Bailey M. [1 ]
Chatham-Carpenter, April [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Appl Commun, Little Rock, AR 72204 USA
关键词
Conflict facilitation; conversational receptiveness; listening; structured dialogue; political rhetoric; DELIBERATION; DIALOGUE;
D O I
10.1080/00909882.2022.2093122
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This study explores the conversational receptiveness strategies that are intentionally embedded in the Braver Angels organization's Red/Blue Workshops. These workshops facilitate difficult conversations across the political divide in the United States, especially communication between Republicans and Democrats. Workshop training materials and workshop recordings were analyzed to identify how moderators were trained to encourage conversational receptiveness through structured dialogue. Results identified trained facilitator strategies (greeting behaviors, acknowledging power differences, setting up structures for safety of outgroup conversations, active listening, and showing appreciation for participant input), structured conversational receptiveness practices (limiting assumptions through perspective-taking and locating shared interests), and the strategic sequencing of training activities all contributed to creating dialogic moments. The conversational work done in these workshops around sharing one's own perspective and invoking the perspectives of others, holds potential implications for helping to create communities of dialogue where people can develop conversational receptiveness, both within these workshops and beyond.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 71
页数:17
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Angels B, 2019, RED BLUE WORKSHOPS M
[2]  
Barge JK., 2013, The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication, V2nd, P609
[3]  
Baron H., 2021, Can americans depolarize? assessing the effects of reciprocal group reflection on partisan polarization
[4]   Discursive Strategies of Civil Disagreement in Public Dialogue Groups [J].
Black, Laura W. ;
Wiederhold, Anna .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2014, 42 (03) :285-306
[5]  
Bordone, 2018, J DISPUTE RESOLUTION, V2018, P65
[6]  
Braithwaite D.O., 2017, International Encyclopedia of Communication: Methods of Qualitative Research Methods, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118901731.IECRM0057
[7]   Culture and negotiation strategy [J].
Brett, Jeanne M. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2017, 32 (04) :587-590
[8]   The power of being heard: The benefits of 'perspective-giving' in the context of intergroup conflict [J].
Bruneau, Emile G. ;
Saxe, Rebecca .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 48 (04) :855-866
[9]   Beyond Problem Solving: Reconceptualizing the Work of Public Deliberation as Deliberative Inquiry [J].
Carcasson, Martin ;
Sprain, Leah .
COMMUNICATION THEORY, 2016, 26 (01) :41-63
[10]  
Carothers T., 2019, DEMOCRACIES DIVIDED