State-Level Abortion Policy Hostility and Unplanned Births in the Pre-Dobbs Era

被引:4
|
作者
Eddelbuettel, Julia C. P. [1 ,2 ]
Sassler, Sharon [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Brooks Sch Publ Policy, Dept Policy Anal & Management, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, PhD Program Hlth Policy, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
PRAMS; Abortion restrictions; Abortion policy; Unintended pregnancy; Unplanned birth; UNINTENDED PREGNANCY; UNITED-STATES; IMPACT; HEALTH; WOMEN; IMPLEMENTATION; SERVICES; RATES;
D O I
10.1215/00703370-10952575
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
An increas ingly hos tile pol icy cli mate has reshaped abor tion access the United States. Recent lit er a ture has stud ied the effects of restric tive abor tion pol- icies on reproductive health outcomes. This study is the first to investigate the asso- ci a tion between state -level abor tion pol icy hos til ity and the preg nancy inten tions women with a preg nancy resulting in live birth. Data are from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System sur vey, merged with a state -level leg is la tive data- base from 2012-2018 and other state -level con trols. Cross-sec tional results reveal that a one -unit increase in abor tion pol icy hos til ity is asso ci ated with a rel a tive risk (odds) of hav ing a live birth resulting from an unin tended ver sus intended preg nancy that is 1.02 times as high (RRR = 1.02, 95% confidence interval = 1.01, 1.03). This result cor re sponds to a 13% increase in the predicted prob a bil ity of hav ing a live birth resulting from an unin tended preg nancy between a zero-hos til ity and a max i mum- hostility state. Models stratified by demographic and socioeconomic characteristics reveal that the asso ci a tion between abor tion pol icy hos til ity and live birth resulting from an unin tended preg nancy is par tic u larly robust among women in youn ger, less educated, Medicaid, uninsured, and rural populations.
引用
收藏
页码:1469 / 1491
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Supply or Demand, Make or Buy: Two Simple Frameworks for Thinking About a State-Level Brain Drain Policy
    Gottlieb, Paul D.
    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, 2011, 25 (04) : 303 - 315
  • [32] Early Childhood Development as Economic Development: Considerations for State-Level Policy Innovation and Experimentation
    Jenkins, Jade Marcus
    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, 2014, 28 (02) : 147 - 165
  • [33] Punitive ambiguity: State-level criminal record data quality in the era of widespread background screening
    McElhattan, David
    PUNISHMENT & SOCIETY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PENOLOGY, 2022, 24 (03): : 367 - 386
  • [34] Who Pays for Environmental Policy? Business Power and the Design of State-Level Climate Policies
    Basseches, Joshua A.
    POLITICS & SOCIETY, 2024, 52 (03) : 409 - 451
  • [35] The association of US state-level abortion restrictions with medication abortion service delivery innovations during the early COVID-19 pandemic
    Janiak, Elizabeth
    Belizaire, Carmela
    Liu, Jessie
    Fulcher, Isabel R.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2022, 113 : 26 - 29
  • [36] State-Level Immigration Policy Context and Health: How Are Latinx Immigrant Parents Faring?
    Ayon, Cecilia
    SOCIAL WORK RESEARCH, 2020, 44 (02) : 110 - 122
  • [37] State-Level Immigrant Policy Climates and Health Care Among US Children of Immigrants
    Dondero, Molly
    Altman, Claire E.
    POPULATION RESEARCH AND POLICY REVIEW, 2022, 41 (06) : 2683 - 2708
  • [38] Trends in Kindergarten Rates of Vaccine Exemption and State-Level Policy, 2011-2016
    Omer, Saad B.
    Porter, Rachael M.
    Allen, Kristen
    Salmon, Daniel A.
    Bednarczyk, Robert A.
    OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 5 (02):
  • [39] Effects of state-level policy changes on homicide and nonfatal shootings of law enforcement officers
    Crifasi, Cassandra K.
    Pollack, Keshia M.
    Webster, Daniel W.
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2016, 22 (04) : 274 - 278
  • [40] Strategic Policy Choice in State-Level Regulation: The EPA's Clean Power Plan
    Bushnell, James B.
    Holland, Stephen P.
    Hughes, Jonathan E.
    Knittel, Christopher R.
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2017, 9 (02) : 57 - 90