State-Level Abortion Policy Hostility and Unplanned Births in the Pre-Dobbs Era

被引:6
作者
Eddelbuettel, Julia C. P. [1 ,2 ]
Sassler, Sharon [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Brooks Sch Publ Policy, Dept Policy Anal & Management, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, PhD Program Hlth Policy, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
PRAMS; Abortion restrictions; Abortion policy; Unintended pregnancy; Unplanned birth; UNINTENDED PREGNANCY; UNITED-STATES; IMPACT; HEALTH; WOMEN; IMPLEMENTATION; SERVICES; RATES;
D O I
10.1215/00703370-10952575
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
An increas ingly hos tile pol icy cli mate has reshaped abor tion access the United States. Recent lit er a ture has stud ied the effects of restric tive abor tion pol- icies on reproductive health outcomes. This study is the first to investigate the asso- ci a tion between state -level abor tion pol icy hos til ity and the preg nancy inten tions women with a preg nancy resulting in live birth. Data are from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System sur vey, merged with a state -level leg is la tive data- base from 2012-2018 and other state -level con trols. Cross-sec tional results reveal that a one -unit increase in abor tion pol icy hos til ity is asso ci ated with a rel a tive risk (odds) of hav ing a live birth resulting from an unin tended ver sus intended preg nancy that is 1.02 times as high (RRR = 1.02, 95% confidence interval = 1.01, 1.03). This result cor re sponds to a 13% increase in the predicted prob a bil ity of hav ing a live birth resulting from an unin tended preg nancy between a zero-hos til ity and a max i mum- hostility state. Models stratified by demographic and socioeconomic characteristics reveal that the asso ci a tion between abor tion pol icy hos til ity and live birth resulting from an unin tended preg nancy is par tic u larly robust among women in youn ger, less educated, Medicaid, uninsured, and rural populations.
引用
收藏
页码:1469 / 1491
页数:23
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Association of Texas Senate Bill 8 With Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion [J].
Aiken, Abigail R. A. ;
Starling, Jennifer E. ;
Scott, James G. ;
Gomperts, Rebecca .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (02)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Key statistics from the National Survey of Family Growth 2015-2019
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Targeted regulation of abortion providers (TRAP) laws
[5]   Constructing a longitudinal database of targeted regulation of abortion providers laws [J].
Austin, Nichole ;
Harper, Sam .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 54 (05) :1084-1089
[6]   Quantifying the impact of targeted regulation of abortion provider laws on US abortion rates: a multi-state assessment [J].
Austin, Nichole ;
Harper, Sam .
CONTRACEPTION, 2019, 100 (05) :374-379
[7]   Assessing the impact of TRAP laws on abortion and women's health in the USA: a systematic review [J].
Austin, Nichole ;
Harper, Sam .
BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2018, 44 (02) :128-134
[8]   Country-specific estimates of unintended pregnancy and abortion incidence: a global comparative analysis of levels in 2015-2019 [J].
Bearak, Jonathan Marc ;
Popinchalk, Anna ;
Beavin, Cynthia ;
Ganatra, Bela ;
Moller, Ann-Beth ;
Tuncalp, Oezge ;
Alkema, Leontine .
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2022, 7 (03)
[9]   Women's Mental Health and Well-being 5 Years After Receiving or Being Denied an Abortion A Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort Study [J].
Biggs, M. Antonia ;
Upadhyay, Ushma D. ;
McCulloch, Charles E. ;
Foster, Diana G. .
JAMA PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 74 (02) :169-178
[10]   Impact of State-Level Reproductive Health Legislation on Access to and Use of Reproductive Health Services and Reproductive Health Outcomes: A Systematic Scoping Review in the Affordable Care Act Era [J].
Bossick, Andrew S. ;
Brown, Jennifer ;
Hanna, Ami ;
Parrish, Canada ;
Williams, Emily C. ;
Katon, Jodie G. .
WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2021, 31 (02) :114-121