Safety profile of magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease

被引:4
|
作者
Froiio, Caterina [1 ]
Aiolfi, Alberto [2 ]
Bona, Davide [2 ]
Bonavina, Luigi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Div Gen & Foregut Surg, IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Div Gen Surg, IRCCS Galeazzi St Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2023年 / 10卷
关键词
magnetic sphincter augmentation device; LINX; erosion; dysphagia; MSA removal; gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM; DEVICE; EFFICACY; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2023.1293270
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) procedure is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Adverse events requiring MSA device removal are rare, but the true prevalence and incidence may be underestimated.Methods: Retrospective study on a prospectively collected database. Patients who underwent MSA procedure between March 2007 and September 2021 in two tertiary-care referral centers for esophageal surgery were included. The trend of MSA explant, the changes in the sizing technique and crura repair over the years, the technique of explant, and the clinical outcomes of the revisional procedure were reviewed.Results: Out of 397 consecutive patients, 50 (12.4%) underwent MSA removal, with a median time to explant of 39.5 [IQR = 53.7] months. Main symptoms leading to removal were dysphagia (43.2%), heartburn (25%), and epigastric pain (13.6%). Erosion occurred in 2.5% of patients. Smaller (12- and 13-bead) devices were the ones most frequently explanted. The majority of the explants were performed laparoscopically with endoscopic assistance. There was no perioperative morbidity, and the median length of stay was 2.8 +/- 1.4 days. After 2014, changes in sizing technique and crura repair resulted in a decreased incidence of explants from 23% to 5% (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed the protective role of added bead units [HR 0.06 (95% CI = 0.001-0.220); p < 0.000].Conclusion: Oversizing and full mediastinal dissection with posterior hiatoplasty may improve the outcomes of the MSA procedure and possibly reduce removal rates.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Safety of magnetic sphincter augmentation in patients with prior bariatric and anti-reflux surgery
    Steven G. Leeds
    Andrew Ngov
    Gerald O. Ogola
    Marc A. Ward
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 5322 - 5327
  • [42] Lower esophageal sphincter augmentation by endoscopic injection of dextranomer hyaluronic acid copolymer in a porcine gastroesophageal reflux disease model
    Alshehri, Abdullah
    Emil, Sherif
    Laberge, Jean-Martin
    Elkady, Sherif
    Blumenkrantz, Miriam
    Mayrand, Serge
    Morinville, Veronique
    Van-Hung Nguyen
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2014, 49 (09) : 1353 - 1359
  • [43] Safety of magnetic sphincter augmentation in patients with prior bariatric and anti-reflux surgery
    Leeds, Steven G.
    Ngov, Andrew
    O. Ogola, Gerald
    Ward, Marc A.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (09): : 5322 - 5327
  • [44] Upper Esophageal Sphincter Dysfunction in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Dantas, Roberto Oliveira
    Cassiani, Rachel Aguiar
    DYSPHAGIA, 2019, 34 (06) : 942 - 943
  • [45] MAGNETIC SPHINCTER AUGMENTATION DEVICE FOR GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE: EFFECTIVE, BUT POSTOPERATIVE DYSPHAGIA AND RISK OF EROSION SHOULD NOT BE UNDERESTIMATED. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Valinoti, Agustin Cesar
    Angeramo, Cristian Agustin
    Dreifuss, Nicolas
    Herbella, Fernando Augusto Mardiros
    Schlottmann, Francisco
    ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 36
  • [46] Introduction of Mechanical Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease into Practice: Early Clinical Outcomes and Keys to Successful Adoption
    Smith, C. Daniel
    DeVault, Kenneth R.
    Buchanan, Mauricia
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2014, 218 (04) : 776 - 781
  • [47] Selected commentary to “Esophageal sphincter device for gastroesophageal reflux disease”
    L. Bonavina
    L. Bonavina
    European Surgery, 2013, 45 : 113 - 116
  • [48] A budget impact analysis of a magnetic sphincter augmentation device for the treatment of medication-refractory mechanical gastroesophageal reflux disease: a United States payer perspective
    John Pandolfino
    John Lipham
    Amarpreet Chawla
    Nicole Ferko
    Andrew Hogan
    Rana A. Qadeer
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 : 1561 - 1572
  • [49] Laparoscopic management of pathologic gastroesophageal reflux after sleeve gastrectomy using the magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) device—a Video Vignette
    Davide Bona
    Marco Antonio Zappa
    Valerio Panizzo
    Andrea Sozzi
    Caterina Lastraioli
    Francesca Lombardo
    Cristina Ogliari
    Alberto Aiolfi
    Obesity Surgery, 2022, 32 : 1791 - 1793
  • [50] A Modern Magnetic Implant for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Ganz, Robert A.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 15 (09) : 1326 - 1337