Safety profile of magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease

被引:4
|
作者
Froiio, Caterina [1 ]
Aiolfi, Alberto [2 ]
Bona, Davide [2 ]
Bonavina, Luigi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Div Gen & Foregut Surg, IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Div Gen Surg, IRCCS Galeazzi St Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2023年 / 10卷
关键词
magnetic sphincter augmentation device; LINX; erosion; dysphagia; MSA removal; gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM; DEVICE; EFFICACY; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2023.1293270
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) procedure is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Adverse events requiring MSA device removal are rare, but the true prevalence and incidence may be underestimated.Methods: Retrospective study on a prospectively collected database. Patients who underwent MSA procedure between March 2007 and September 2021 in two tertiary-care referral centers for esophageal surgery were included. The trend of MSA explant, the changes in the sizing technique and crura repair over the years, the technique of explant, and the clinical outcomes of the revisional procedure were reviewed.Results: Out of 397 consecutive patients, 50 (12.4%) underwent MSA removal, with a median time to explant of 39.5 [IQR = 53.7] months. Main symptoms leading to removal were dysphagia (43.2%), heartburn (25%), and epigastric pain (13.6%). Erosion occurred in 2.5% of patients. Smaller (12- and 13-bead) devices were the ones most frequently explanted. The majority of the explants were performed laparoscopically with endoscopic assistance. There was no perioperative morbidity, and the median length of stay was 2.8 +/- 1.4 days. After 2014, changes in sizing technique and crura repair resulted in a decreased incidence of explants from 23% to 5% (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed the protective role of added bead units [HR 0.06 (95% CI = 0.001-0.220); p < 0.000].Conclusion: Oversizing and full mediastinal dissection with posterior hiatoplasty may improve the outcomes of the MSA procedure and possibly reduce removal rates.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Magnetic sphincter augmentation is an effective treatment for atypical symptoms caused by gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Ward, Marc A.
    Ebrahim, Ahmed
    Kopita, Jeffrey
    Arviso, Lindsay
    Ogola, Gerald O.
    Buckmaster, Brittany
    Leeds, Steven G.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (11): : 4909 - 4915
  • [22] Manometric Changes to the Lower Esophageal Sphincter After Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation in Patients With Chronic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Warren, Heather F.
    Louie, Brian E.
    Farivar, Alexander S.
    Wilshire, Candice
    Aye, Ralph W.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 266 (01) : 99 - 104
  • [23] Early results of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aiolfi, Alberto
    Asti, Emanuele
    Bernardi, Daniele
    Bonitta, Gianluca
    Rausa, Emanuele
    Siboni, Stefano
    Bonavina, Luigi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 52 : 82 - 88
  • [24] Multi-institutional outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Warren, Heather F.
    Reynolds, Jessica L.
    Lipham, John C.
    Zehetner, Joerg
    Bildzukewicz, Nikolai A.
    Taiganides, Paul A.
    Mickley, Jody
    Aye, Ralph W.
    Farivar, Alexander S.
    Louie, Brian E.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (08): : 3289 - 3296
  • [25] Adverse Events After Implantation of a Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device for Gastroesophageal Reflux
    Bielefeldt, Klaus
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 14 (10) : 1507 - 1508
  • [26] Magnetic sphincter augmentation in treating refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhuang, Qian Jun
    Tan, Nian Di
    Chen, Song Feng
    Zhang, Meng Yu
    Xiao, Ying Lian
    JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2021, 22 (12) : 695 - 705
  • [27] The role of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in the gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) treatment pathway: the gastroenterology perspective
    Patel, Amit
    Gyawali, C. Prakash
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2023, 36
  • [28] Esophageal Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation as a Novel Approach to Post-bariatric Surgery Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Kuckelman, John P.
    Phillips, Cody J.
    Derickson, Michael J.
    Faler, Byron J.
    Martin, Matthew J.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2018, 28 (10) : 3080 - 3086
  • [29] Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and pooled analysis
    Guidozzi, Nadia
    Wiggins, Tom
    Ahmed, Ahmed R.
    Hanna, George B.
    Markar, Sheraz R.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2019, 32 (09)
  • [30] Feasibility and Efficacy of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Post-Sleeve Gastrectomy for Obesity
    Khaitan, Leena
    Hill, Michael
    Michel, Michael
    Chiasson, Patrick
    Woodworth, Philip
    Bell, Reginald
    Sadek, Ragui
    Hoffman, Aaron
    Loing, Kari
    Veldhuis, Paula
    Petraiuolo, William
    Anciano, Carlos
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 (01) : 387 - 396