Safety profile of magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease

被引:4
|
作者
Froiio, Caterina [1 ]
Aiolfi, Alberto [2 ]
Bona, Davide [2 ]
Bonavina, Luigi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Div Gen & Foregut Surg, IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Div Gen Surg, IRCCS Galeazzi St Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2023年 / 10卷
关键词
magnetic sphincter augmentation device; LINX; erosion; dysphagia; MSA removal; gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM; DEVICE; EFFICACY; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2023.1293270
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) procedure is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Adverse events requiring MSA device removal are rare, but the true prevalence and incidence may be underestimated.Methods: Retrospective study on a prospectively collected database. Patients who underwent MSA procedure between March 2007 and September 2021 in two tertiary-care referral centers for esophageal surgery were included. The trend of MSA explant, the changes in the sizing technique and crura repair over the years, the technique of explant, and the clinical outcomes of the revisional procedure were reviewed.Results: Out of 397 consecutive patients, 50 (12.4%) underwent MSA removal, with a median time to explant of 39.5 [IQR = 53.7] months. Main symptoms leading to removal were dysphagia (43.2%), heartburn (25%), and epigastric pain (13.6%). Erosion occurred in 2.5% of patients. Smaller (12- and 13-bead) devices were the ones most frequently explanted. The majority of the explants were performed laparoscopically with endoscopic assistance. There was no perioperative morbidity, and the median length of stay was 2.8 +/- 1.4 days. After 2014, changes in sizing technique and crura repair resulted in a decreased incidence of explants from 23% to 5% (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed the protective role of added bead units [HR 0.06 (95% CI = 0.001-0.220); p < 0.000].Conclusion: Oversizing and full mediastinal dissection with posterior hiatoplasty may improve the outcomes of the MSA procedure and possibly reduce removal rates.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Results of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Schwameis, Katrin
    Nikolic, Milena
    Castellano, Deivis G. Morales
    Steindl, Ariane
    Macheck, Sarah
    Kristo, Ivan
    Zoerner, Barbara
    Schoppmann, Sebastian F.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 42 (10) : 3263 - 3269
  • [2] Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: review of clinical studies
    Asti, Emanuele
    Aiolfi, Alberto
    Lazzari, Veronica
    Sironi, Andrea
    Porta, Matteo
    Bonavina, Luigi
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2018, 70 (03) : 323 - 330
  • [3] Evolution of a novel technology for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a safety perspective of magnetic sphincter augmentation
    DeMarchi, Janet
    Schwiers, Michael
    Soberman, Mark
    Tokarski, Allison
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2021, 34 (11)
  • [4] Safety analysis of first 1000 patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Lipham, J. C.
    Taiganides, P. A.
    Louie, B. E.
    Ganz, R. A.
    DeMeester, T. R.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2015, 28 (04): : 305 - 311
  • [5] Revaluation of the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Zhang, Hongke
    Dong, Dinghui
    Liu, Zhengwen
    He, Shuixiang
    Hu, Liangshuo
    Lv, Yi
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (09): : 3684 - 3690
  • [6] Postoperative Dysphagia Following Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Tsai, Catherine
    Steffen, Rudolf
    Kessler, Ulf
    Merki, Hans
    Lipham, John
    Zehetner, Joerg
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2020, 30 (04) : 322 - 326
  • [7] The role of magnetic sphincter augmentation in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Bonavina, Luigi
    Boyle, Nick
    Schoppmann, Sebastian F.
    CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 37 (04) : 384 - 389
  • [8] Factors influencing the outcome of magnetic sphincter augmentation for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Warren, Heather F.
    Brown, Lisa M.
    Mihura, Matias
    Farivar, Alexander S.
    Aye, Ralph W.
    Louie, Brian E.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (01): : 405 - 412
  • [9] Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: review of clinical studies
    Emanuele Asti
    Alberto Aiolfi
    Veronica Lazzari
    Andrea Sironi
    Matteo Porta
    Luigi Bonavina
    Updates in Surgery, 2018, 70 : 323 - 330
  • [10] Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Outcomes in Severe Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Ferrari, Davide
    Siboni, Stefano
    Riva, Carlo Galdino
    Guerrazzi, Guglielmo
    Lovece, Andrea
    Bonavina, Luigi
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 8