Keep trusting! A plea for the notion of Trustworthy AI

被引:6
作者
Zanotti, Giacomo [1 ]
Petrolo, Mattia [2 ,3 ]
Chiffi, Daniele [4 ]
Schiaffonati, Viola [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Elect Informat & Bioengn, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Lisbon CFCUL, Ctr Philosophy Sci, Bldg C4, P-1749016 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Fed Univ ABC, Alameda Univ s-n, BR-09606045 Sao Bernardo Do Campo, SP, Brazil
[4] Politecn Milan, Dept Architecture & Urban Studies, Milan, Italy
关键词
Trustworthy AI; Ethics of AI; Trust; Reliance; Interpersonal and artificial trust;
D O I
10.1007/s00146-023-01789-9
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A lot of attention has recently been devoted to the notion of Trustworthy AI (TAI). However, the very applicability of the notions of trust and trustworthiness to AI systems has been called into question. A purely epistemic account of trust can hardly ground the distinction between trustworthy and merely reliable AI, while it has been argued that insisting on the importance of the trustee's motivations and goodwill makes the notion of TAI a categorical error. After providing an overview of the debate, we contend that the prevailing views on trust and AI fail to account for the ethically relevant and value-laden aspects of the design and use of AI systems, and we propose an understanding of the notion of TAI that explicitly aims at capturing these aspects. The problems involved in applying trust and trustworthiness to AI systems are overcome by keeping apart trust in AI systems and interpersonal trust. These notions share a conceptual core but should be treated as distinct ones.
引用
收藏
页码:2691 / 2702
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Machine Learning and Health Care Disparities in Dermatology
    Adamson, Adewole S.
    Smith, Avery
    [J]. JAMA DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 154 (11) : 1247 - 1248
  • [2] AI HLEG (High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence), 2019, ETH GUID TRUSTW AI
  • [3] Anderson Michael, 2011, Machine Ethics
  • [4] In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence
    Araujo, Theo
    Helberger, Natali
    Kruikemeier, Sanne
    de Vreese, Claes H.
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2020, 35 (03) : 611 - 623
  • [5] TRUST AND ANTITRUST
    BAIER, A
    [J]. ETHICS, 1986, 96 (02) : 231 - 260
  • [6] On Predicting Recidivism: Epistemic Risk, Tradeoffs, and Values in Machine Learning
    Biddle, Justin B.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2022, 52 (03) : 321 - 341
  • [7] Brown TB, 2020, ADV NEUR IN, V33
  • [8] Buechner J., 2014, P CEPE 2013 C, P65
  • [9] Can we trust robots?
    Coeckelbergh, Mark
    [J]. ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 14 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [10] Disparities in dermatology AI performance on a diverse, curated clinical image set
    Daneshjou, Roxana
    Vodrahalli, Kailas
    Novoa, Roberto A.
    Jenkins, Melissa
    Liang, Weixin
    Rotemberg, Veronica
    Ko, Justin
    Swetter, Susan M.
    Bailey, Elizabeth E.
    Gevaert, Olivier
    Mukherjee, Pritam
    Phung, Michelle
    Yekrang, Kiana
    Fong, Bradley
    Sahasrabudhe, Rachna
    Allerup, Johan A. C.
    Okata-Karigane, Utako
    Zou, James
    Chiou, Albert S.
    [J]. SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2022, 8 (32)