The diagnostic accuracy of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale without the self-harm item

被引:4
|
作者
Chen, Chong [1 ,2 ]
Okubo, Ryo [3 ,4 ]
Okawa, Sumiyo [5 ]
Nakagawa, Shin [1 ,2 ]
Tabuchi, Takahiro [6 ]
机构
[1] Yamaguchi Univ, Dept Neurosci, Div Neuropsychiat, Ube, Japan
[2] Grad Sch Med, Ube, Japan
[3] Natl Hosp Org, Dept Psychiat, Obihiro, Japan
[4] Obihiro Hosp, Obihiro, Japan
[5] Inst Global Hlth Policy Res, Natl Ctr Global Hlth & Med, Bur Int Hlth Cooperat, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Osaka Int Canc Inst, Canc Control Ctr, Osaka, Japan
基金
日本科学技术振兴机构; 日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; Suicidal ideation; Self-harm; Pregnancy; Postpartum; Screening; Sensitivity; WOMEN; VALIDATION; THOUGHTS; VERSION; SUICIDE; EPDS; PREGNANCY; BEHAVIOR; IDEATION; ASKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.07.015
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is the most commonly used screening tool for perinatal depression. However, the 10th item of the EPDS intended to evaluate suicide ideation does not accurately capture suicide ideation and may cause psychological distress. Whereas endorsement of the strongest agreement "yes, quite often" on this item may be associated with suicide ideation, the response on this frequency is perfectly predicted by the EPDS full score. The discard of this item, therefore, is preferred. In the current study, using data from a nation-wide internet survey conducted in Japanese postpartum (n = 5688) and pregnant women (n = 1639), we show that the EPDS-9 without the 10th item correlates perfectly with the full EPDS or EPDS-10. Furthermore, the EPDS-9 and EPDS-10 have equivalent performance in differentiating participants' selfreported depression diagnosis as well as Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6)-based screening of depression. Lastly, at the cutoff of 9, the EPDS-9 performs well in predicting participants' response on the 10th item of EPDS; specifically, the sensitivity of differentiating frequent thoughts of self-harm is 0.968 and 1 in postpartum and pregnant women, respectively. Therefore, the EPDS-9 performs equivalently to EPDS-10 and can be considered to replace EPDS-10 in future use.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 76
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of the Maltese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
    Felice, E
    Saliba, J
    Grech, V
    Cox, J
    ARCHIVES OF WOMENS MENTAL HEALTH, 2006, 9 (02) : 75 - 80
  • [22] The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Translation and antepartum validation for a Hungarian sample
    Toereki, Annamaria
    Ando, Balint
    Kereszturi, Attila
    Sikovanyecz, Janos
    Dudas, Robert B.
    Janka, Zoltan
    Kozinszky, Zoltan
    Pal, Attila
    MIDWIFERY, 2013, 29 (04) : 308 - 315
  • [23] The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as a measure for antenatal dysphoria
    Kwan, Rui
    Bautista, Dianne
    Choo, Robin
    Cai Shirong
    Chee, Cornelia
    Saw, Seang Mei
    Chong, Yap-Seng
    Kwek, Kenneth
    Meaney, Michael J.
    Rush, A. John
    Chen, Helen
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 33 (01) : 28 - 41
  • [24] Self-harm in pregnancy and the postnatal year: prevalence and risk factors
    Ayre, Karyn
    Liu, Xiaoqin
    Howard, Louise M.
    Dutta, Rina
    Munk-Olsen, Trine
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 53 (07) : 2895 - 2903
  • [25] The use of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale to identify postnatal depression symptoms at well child visit
    Curro, Vincenzo
    De Rosa, Emilia
    Maulucci, Silvia
    Maulucci, Maria Lucia
    Silvestri, Maria Teresa
    Zambrano, Annaluce
    Regine, Vincenza
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2009, 35
  • [26] Multidimensionality within the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale: application issues of specific structure
    Ratislavova, Katerina
    Lorenzova, Eva Hendrych
    Lochmannova, Alena
    Martin, Colin R.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023,
  • [27] Generating an efficient version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in an urban obstetrical population
    Gollan, Jackie K.
    Wisniewski, Stephen R.
    Luther, James F.
    Eng, Heather F.
    Dills, John Louis
    Sit, Dorothy
    Ciolino, Jody D.
    Wisner, Katherine L.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2017, 208 : 615 - 620
  • [28] Identifying postnatal depression: Comparison of a self-reported depression item with Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale scores at three months postpartum
    Fellmeth, Gracia
    Opondo, Charles
    Henderson, Jane
    Redshaw, Maggie
    Mcneill, Jenny
    Lynn, Fiona
    Alderdice, Fiona
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2019, 251 : 8 - 14
  • [29] Validation of the Mainland Chinese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in Chengdu mothers
    Lau, Ying
    Wang, Yuqiong
    Yin, Lei
    Chan, Kin Sun
    Guo, Xiujing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2010, 47 (09) : 1139 - 1151
  • [30] Errors in scoring the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression scale
    Matthey, Stephen
    Lee, Charmian
    Crncec, Rudi
    Trapolini, Tania
    ARCHIVES OF WOMENS MENTAL HEALTH, 2013, 16 (02) : 117 - 122