Seismic risk and resilience analysis of networked industrial facilities

被引:13
作者
Tabandeh, Armin [1 ]
Sharma, Neetesh [2 ]
Gardoni, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Urbana, IL 61820 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Stanford, CA USA
关键词
Seismic resilience; Uncertainty propagation; Networked systems; Functionality; Reliability; MODELS;
D O I
10.1007/s10518-023-01728-5
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Industrial facilities, as an essential part of socio-economic systems, are susceptible to disruptions caused by earthquakes. Such disruptions may result from direct structural damage to facilities or their loss of functionality due to impacts on their support facilities and infrastructure systems. Decisions to improve the seismic performance of industrial facilities should ideally be informed by risk (and resilience) analysis, taking into account their loss of functionality and the following recovery under the influence of various sources of uncertainty. Rather than targeting specific individual facilities like a hazardous chemical plant, our objective is to quantify the resilience of interacting industrial facilities (i.e., networked industrial facilities) in the face of uncertain seismic events while accounting for their functional dependencies on infrastructure systems. A specific facility, such as a hazardous chemical plant, can be a compound node in the network representation, interacting with other facilities and their supporting infrastructure components. In this context, a compound node is a complex system in its own right. To this end, this paper proposes a formulation to model the functionality of interacting industrial facilities and infrastructure using a system of coupled differential equations, representing dynamic processes on interdependent networked systems. The equations are subject to uncertain initial conditions and have uncertain coefficients, capturing the effects of uncertainties in earthquake intensity measures, structural damage, and post-disaster recovery process. The paper presents a computationally tractable approach to quantify and propagate various sources of uncertainty through the formulated equations. It also discusses the recovery of damaged industrial facilities and infrastructure components under resource and implementation constraints. The effects of changes in structural properties and networks' connectivity are incorporated into the governing equations to model networks' functionality recovery and quantify their resilience. The paper illustrates the proposed approach for the seismic resilience analysis of a hypothetical but realistic shipping company in the city of Memphis in Tennessee, United States. The example models the effects of dependent water and power infrastructure systems on the functionality disruption and recovery of networked industrial facilities subject to seismic hazards.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 276
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Formation of Networked Microgrids for Operational Flexibility and Resilience [J].
Shimillas, Marios ;
Venkatasubramanian, Balaji V. ;
Hatziargyriou, Nikos ;
Panteli, Mathaios .
2024 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART ENERGY SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, SEST 2024, 2024,
[22]   Quantitative method for seismic resilience assessment of individual buildings [J].
Jia, Shuo ;
Zhan, Dong-Jie .
STRUCTURES, 2024, 64
[23]   Field reconnaissance on seismic performance and functionality of Turkish industrial facilities affected by the 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake sequence [J].
Sagbas, Gulsah ;
Garjan, Ramin Sheikhi ;
Sarikaya, Kerem ;
Deniz, Derya .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2024, 22 (01) :227-254
[24]   Field reconnaissance on seismic performance and functionality of Turkish industrial facilities affected by the 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake sequence [J].
Gulsah Sagbas ;
Ramin Sheikhi Garjan ;
Kerem Sarikaya ;
Derya Deniz .
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2024, 22 :227-254
[25]   Seismic Resilience Assessment of the Hybrid Bridge Pier Based on Fragility Analysis [J].
Jianpeng Sun ;
Weichao Xu ;
Zihan Tan .
International Journal of Steel Structures, 2024, 24 :324-338
[26]   Generalized system restoration models of ductility bridges for seismic resilience analysis [J].
Kang, Wei ;
Luo, Qin ;
Pang, Yutao ;
Wei, Kai .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2024, 187
[27]   Seismic Resilience Assessment of the Hybrid Bridge Pier Based on Fragility Analysis [J].
Sun, Jianpeng ;
Xu, Weichao ;
Tan, Zihan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEEL STRUCTURES, 2024, 24 (02) :324-338
[28]   Seismic resilience of a hospital system [J].
Cimellaro, Gian Paolo ;
Reinhorn, Andrei M. ;
Bruneau, Michel .
STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2010, 6 (1-2) :127-144
[29]   Seismic resilience analysis of aging RC bridges subjected to seismic sequences via intensifying excitation functions [J].
Ashrafifar, Behzad ;
Javaherian, Pooya ;
Ashrafifar, Javid .
STRUCTURES, 2025, 73
[30]   Resilience-incorporated seismic risk assessment of precast concrete frames with "dry" connections [J].
Wu, Chenhao ;
Tang, Yuchuan ;
Cao, Xuyang ;
Wu, Gang .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION, 2024, 23 (02) :403-425