Imputation and missing indicators for handling missing data in the development and deployment of clinical prediction models: A simulation study

被引:16
|
作者
Sisk, Rose [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Sperrin, Matthew [1 ,3 ]
Peek, Niels [1 ,3 ,4 ]
van Smeden, Maarten [5 ]
Martin, Glen Philip [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Informat Imaging & Data Sci, Manchester, England
[2] Gendius Ltd, Macclesfield, England
[3] Alan Turing Inst, London, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, NIHR Manchester Biomed Res Ctr, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Manchester, England
[5] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht Univ, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Informat Imaging & Data Sci, Vaughan House,Portsmouth St, Manchester, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Clinical prediction model; missing data; imputation; electronic health record; simulation; prediction; VALUES; SAMPLES;
D O I
10.1177/09622802231165001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In clinical prediction modelling, missing data can occur at any stage of the model pipeline; development, validation or deployment. Multiple imputation is often recommended yet challenging to apply at deployment; for example, the outcome cannot be in the imputation model, as recommended under multiple imputation. Regression imputation uses a fitted model to impute the predicted value of missing predictors from observed data, and could offer a pragmatic alternative at deployment. Moreover, the use of missing indicators has been proposed to handle informative missingness, but it is currently unknown how well this method performs in the context of clinical prediction models.Methods: We simulated data under various missing data mechanisms to compare the predictive performance of clinical prediction models developed using both imputation methods. We consider deployment scenarios where missing data is permitted or prohibited, imputation models that use or omit the outcome, and clinical prediction models that include or omit missing indicators. We assume that the missingness mechanism remains constant across the model pipeline. We also apply the proposed strategies to critical care data. Results: With complete data available at deployment, our findings were in line with existing recommendations; that the outcome should be used to impute development data when using multiple imputation and omitted under regression imputation. When missingness is allowed at deployment, omitting the outcome from the imputation model at the development was preferred. Missing indicators improved model performance in many cases but can be harmful under outcome-dependent missingness.Conclusion: We provide evidence that commonly taught principles of handling missing data via multiple imputation may not apply to clinical prediction models, particularly when data can be missing at deployment. We observed comparable predictive performance under multiple imputation and regression imputation. The performance of the missing data handling method must be evaluated on a study-by-study basis, and the most appropriate strategy for handling missing data at development should consider whether missing data are allowed at deployment. Some guidance is provided.
引用
收藏
页码:1461 / 1477
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Imputation and Missing Indicators for Handling Missing Longitudinal Data: Data Simulation Analysis Based on Electronic Health Record Data
    Ehrig, Molly
    Bullock, Garrett S.
    Leng, Xiaoyan Iris
    Pajewski, Nicholas M.
    Speiser, Jaime Lynn
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2025, 13
  • [2] Handling missing data in nursing research with multiple imputation
    Kneipp, SM
    McIntosh, M
    NURSING RESEARCH, 2001, 50 (06) : 384 - 389
  • [3] Compatibility in Missing Data Handling Across the Prediction Model Pipeline: A Simulation Study
    Tsvetanova, Antonia
    Sperrin, Matthew
    Jenkins, David
    Peek, Niels
    Buchan, Iain
    Hyland, Stephanie
    Martin, Glen
    MEDINFO 2023 - THE FUTURE IS ACCESSIBLE, 2024, 310 : 1476 - 1477
  • [4] Multiple imputation as a flexible tool for missing data handling in clinical research
    Enders, Craig K.
    BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2017, 98 : 4 - 18
  • [5] Performance Evaluation of Predictive Models for Missing Data Imputation in Weather Data
    Doreswamy
    Gad, Ibrahim
    Manjunatha, B. R.
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN COMPUTING, COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATICS (ICACCI), 2017, : 1327 - 1334
  • [6] Study on missing data imputation and modeling for the leaching process
    He, Dakuo
    Wang, Zhengsong
    Yang, Le
    Dai, Wanwan
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2017, 124 : 1 - 19
  • [7] Multiple imputation with missing indicators as proxies for unmeasured variables: simulation study
    Matthew Sperrin
    Glen P. Martin
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20
  • [8] Comparison of Random Forest and Parametric Imputation Models for Imputing Missing Data Using MICE: A CALIBER Study
    Shah, Anoop D.
    Bartlett, Jonathan W.
    Carpenter, James
    Nicholas, Owen
    Hemingway, Harry
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 179 (06) : 764 - 774
  • [9] Multiple imputation with missing indicators as proxies for unmeasured variables: simulation study
    Sperrin, Matthew
    Martin, Glen P.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [10] Handling missing data in an FFQ: multiple imputation and nutrient intake estimates
    Ichikawa, Mari
    Hosono, Akihiro
    Tamai, Yuya
    Watanabe, Miki
    Shibata, Kiyoshi
    Tsujimura, Shoko
    Oka, Kyoko
    Fujita, Hitomi
    Okamoto, Naoko
    Kamiya, Mayumi
    Kondo, Fumi
    Wakabayashi, Ryozo
    Noguchi, Taiji
    Isomura, Tatsuya
    Imaeda, Nahomi
    Goto, Chiho
    Yamada, Tamaki
    Suzuki, Sadao
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2019, 22 (08) : 1351 - 1360