External validation of the Codman score in colorectal surgery: a pragmatic tool to drive quality improvement

被引:2
作者
Spence, Richard T. [1 ,7 ]
Guidolin, Keegan [2 ]
Quereshy, Fayez A. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Chadi, Sami A. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Chang, David C. [6 ]
Hutter, Matthew M. [6 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Surg, Halifax, NS, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Codman Ctr Clin Effectiveness Surg, Dept Gen Surg, Boston, MA USA
[7] 2100 Creighton St, Halifax, NS B3K 3R8, Canada
关键词
global benchmarking; quality improvement; ADJUSTED SURGICAL OUTCOMES; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; BENCHMARKING; MORBIDITY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1111/codi.16547
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: The simple six-variable Codman score is a tool designed to reduce the complexity of contemporary risk-adjusted postoperative mortality rate predictions. We sought to externally validate the Codman score in colorectal surgery.Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) participant user file and colectomy targeted dataset of 2020 were merged. A Codman score (composed of six variables: age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, emergency status, degree of sepsis, functional status and preoperative blood transfusion) was assigned to every patient. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and secondary outcome was morbidity at 30 days. Logistic regression analyses were performed using the Codman score and the ACS NSQIP mortality and morbidity algorithms as independent variables for the primary and secondary outcomes. The predictive performance of discrimination area under receiver operating curve (AUC) and calibration of the Codman score and these algorithms were compared.Results: A total of 40 589 patients were included and a Codman score was generated for 40 557 (99.02%) patients. The median Codman score was 3 (interquartile range 1-4). To predict mortality, the Codman score had an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.91-0.93) compared to the NSQIP mortality score 0.93 (95% CI 0.92-0.94). To predict morbidity, the Codman score had an AUC of 0.68 (95% CI 0.66-0.68) compared to the NSQIP morbidity score 0.72 (95% CI 0.71-0.73). When body mass index and surgical approach was added to the Codman score, the performance was no different to the NSQIP morbidity score. The calibration of observed versus expected predictions was almost perfect for both the morbidity and mortality NSQIP predictions, and only well fitted for Codman scores of less than 4 and greater than 7.Conclusion: We propose that the six-variable Codman score is an efficient and actionable method for generating validated risk-adjusted outcome predictions and comparative benchmarks to drive quality improvement in colorectal surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1248 / 1256
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Modified frailty index predicts early outcomes after colorectal surgery: an ACS-NSQIP study
    AL-Khamis, A.
    Warner, C.
    Park, J.
    Marecik, S.
    Davis, N.
    Mellgren, A.
    Nordenstam, J.
    Kochar, K.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 21 (10) : 1192 - 1205
  • [2] Data Improvement Through Simplification: Implications for Low-Resource Settings
    Anderson, Geoffrey A.
    Bohnen, Jordan
    Spence, Richard
    Ilcisin, Lenka
    Ladha, Karim
    Chang, David
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 42 (09) : 2725 - 2731
  • [3] Brief Tool to Measure Risk-Adjusted Surgical Outcomes in Resource-Limited Hospitals
    Anderson, Jamie E.
    Lassiter, Randi
    Bickler, Stephen W.
    Talamini, Mark A.
    Chang, David C.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2012, 147 (09) : 798 - 803
  • [4] Perioperative risk prediction in the era of enhanced recovery: a comparison of POSSUM, ACPGBI, and E-PASS scoring systems in major surgical procedures of the colorectal surgeon
    Bagnall, Nigel M.
    Pring, Edward T.
    Malietzis, George
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    Faiz, Omar D.
    Kennedy, Robin H.
    Jenkins, John T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 33 (11) : 1627 - 1634
  • [5] Validity of the CR-POSSUM model in surgery for colorectal cancer in Spain (CCR-CARESS study) and comparison with other models to predict operative mortality
    Bare, Marisa
    Jesus Alcantara, Manuel
    Jose Gil, Maria
    Collera, Pablo
    Pont, Marina
    Escobar, Antonio
    Sarasqueta, Cristina
    Redondo, Maximino
    Briones, Eduardo
    Dujovne, Paula
    Maria Quintana, Jose
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [6] Measuring Surgical Outcomes for Improvement Was Codman Wrong?
    Berwick, Donald M.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 313 (05): : 469 - 470
  • [7] Blueprint for a New American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
    Birkmeyer, John D.
    Shahian, David M.
    Dimick, Justin B.
    Finlayson, Samuel R. G.
    Flum, David R.
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    Hall, Bruce Lee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2008, 207 (05) : 777 - 782
  • [8] Reconceiving the Morbidity and Mortality Conference in an Era of Big Data: An "Unexpected" Outcomes Approach
    Bohnen, Jordan D.
    Chang, David C.
    Lillemoe, Keith D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 263 (05) : 857 - 859
  • [9] Improved Surgical Outcomes for ACS NSQIP Hospitals Over Time Evaluation of Hospital Cohorts With up to 8 Years of Participation
    Cohen, Mark E.
    Liu, Yaoming
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    Hall, Bruce L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 263 (02) : 267 - 273
  • [10] Risk Adjustment for Comparing Hospital Quality with Surgery: How Many Variables Are Needed?
    Dimick, Justin B.
    Osborne, Nicholas H.
    Hall, Bruce L.
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    Birkmeyer, John D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2010, 210 (04) : 503 - 508