Potentially More Out of Reach: Public Reporting Exacerbates Inequities in Home Health Access

被引:11
作者
Fashaw-Walters, Shekinah A. A. [1 ,6 ]
Rahman, Momotazur [2 ,3 ]
Gee, Gilbert [4 ]
Mor, Vincent [2 ,3 ]
Rivera-Hernandez, Maricruz [2 ,3 ]
Ford, Ceron [1 ]
Thomas, Kali S. S. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Brown Univ, Ctr Gerontol & Healthcare Res, Sch Publ Hlth, Providence, RI USA
[3] Brown Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Providence, RI USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] US Dept Vet Affairs, Med Ctr, Ctr Innovat Long Term Serv & Supports, Little Rock, AK USA
[6] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Hlth Policy & Management, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
home health; quality; racial inequities; public reporting; access; LONG-TERM-CARE; UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES; RESIDENTIAL SEGREGATION; QUALITY INFORMATION; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; RACIAL DISPARITIES; MARKET SHARE; PATIENT; AVAILABILITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/1468-0009.12616
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Policy PointsPublic reporting is associated with both mitigating and exacerbating inequities in high-quality home health agency use for marginalized groups.Ensuring equitable access to home health requires taking a closer look at potentially inequitable policies to ensure that these policies are not inadvertently exacerbating disparities as home health public reporting potentially does.Targeted federal, state, and local interventions should focus on raising awareness about the five-star quality ratings among marginalized populations for whom inequities have been exacerbated. ContextLiterature suggests that public reporting of quality may have the unintended consequence of exacerbating disparities in access to high-quality, long-term care for older adults. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the home health five-star ratings on changes in high-quality home health agency use by race, ethnicity, income status, and place-based factors. MethodsWe use data from the Outcome and Assessment Information Set, Medicare Enrollment Files, Care Compare, and American Community Survey to estimate differential access to high-quality home health agencies between July 2014 and June 2017. To estimate the impact of the home health five-star rating introduction on the use of high-quality home health agencies, we use a longitudinal observational pretest-posttest design. FindingsAfter the introduction of the home health five-star ratings in 2016, we found that adjusted rates of high-quality home health agency use increased for all home health patients, except for Hispanic/Latine and Asian American/Pacific Islander patients. Additionally, we found that the disparity in high-quality home health agency use between low-income and higher-income home health patients was exacerbated after the introduction of the five-star quality ratings. We also observed that patients within predominantly Hispanic/Latine neighborhoods had a significant decrease in their use of high-quality home health agencies, whereas patients in predominantly White and integrated neighborhoods had a significant increase in high-quality home health agency use. Other neighborhoods experience a nonsignificant change in high-quality home health agency use. ConclusionsPolicymakers should be aware of the potential unintended consequences for implementing home health public reporting, specifically for Hispanic/Latine, Asian American/Pacific Islander, and low-income home health patients, as well as patients residing in predominantly Hispanic/Latine neighborhoods. Targeted interventions should focus on raising awareness around the five-star ratings.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 559
页数:33
相关论文
共 70 条