The role of defensive information processing in population-based colorectal cancer screening uptake

被引:7
作者
Clarke, Nicholas [1 ,10 ]
Hayes, Louise [2 ]
McQueen, Amy [3 ,4 ]
Gallagher, Pamela [1 ]
Kearney, Patricia M. [5 ]
McNamara, Deirdre [6 ]
O'Morain, Colm A. [7 ]
von Wagner, Christian [8 ]
Mooney, Therese [9 ]
Sharp, Linda [2 ]
机构
[1] Dublin City Univ, Sch Psychol, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Newcastle Univ, Populat Hlth Sci Inst, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[3] Washington Univ St Louis, Brown Sch, Hlth Commun Res Lab, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Washington Univ St Louis, Sch Med, Div Gen Med Sci, St Louis, MO USA
[5] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Publ Hlth, Cork, Ireland
[6] Adelaide & Meath Hosp, Dept Clin Med, Dublin, Ireland
[7] Trinity Coll Dublin, Fac Hlth Sci, Dublin, Ireland
[8] UCL, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London, England
[9] Natl Screening Serv, Dublin, Ireland
[10] Dublin City Univ, Sch Psychol, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
colorectal cancer screening; defensive information processing; fecal immunochemical test; participation; uptake; FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TEST; FIT; PARTICIPATION; PROGRAMS; GENDER;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.34603
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundInternationally, colorectal cancer screening participation remains low despite the availability of home-based testing and numerous interventions to increase uptake. To be effective, interventions should be based on an understanding of what influences individuals' decisions about screening participation. This study investigates the association of defensive information processing (DIP) with fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer screening uptake. MethodsRegression modeling of data from a cross-sectional survey within a population-based FIT screening program was conducted. The survey included the seven subdomains of the McQueen DIP measure. The primary outcome variable was the uptake status (screening user or nonuser). Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for screening nonuse by DIP (sub)domain score, with adjustments made for sociodemographic and behavioral factors associated with uptake. ResultsHigher scores (equating to greater defensiveness) on all DIP domains were significantly associated with lower uptake in the model adjusted for sociodemographic factors. In the model with additional adjustments for behavioral factors, the suppression subdomains of "deny immediacy to be tested" (OR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.65; p < .001) and "self-exemption" (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96; p < .001) independently predicted nonuse of FIT-based screening. ConclusionsThis is the first study outside the United States that has identified DIP as a barrier to colorectal cancer screening uptake, and it is the first focused specifically on FIT-based screening. The findings suggest that two suppression barriers, namely denying the immediacy to be tested and self-exempting oneself from screening, may be promising targets for future interventions to improve uptake.
引用
收藏
页码:1253 / 1260
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   Examining patterns of association with defensive information processing about colorectal cancer screening [J].
McQueen, Amy ;
Swank, Paul R. ;
Vernon, Sally W. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 19 (11) :1443-1458
[22]   Construct Definition and Scale Development for Defensive Information Processing: An Application to Colorectal Cancer Screening [J].
McQueen, Amy ;
Vernon, Sally W. ;
Swank, Paul R. .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 32 (02) :190-202
[23]   Colorectal cancer population screening programs worldwide in 2016: An update [J].
Navarro, Mercedes ;
Nicolas, Andrea ;
Ferrandez, Angel ;
Lanas, Angel .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 23 (20) :3632-3642
[24]  
POWE BD, 1995, CANCER NURS, V18, P385
[25]   Interventions to increase uptake of faecal tests for colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review [J].
Rat, Cedric ;
Latour, Chloe ;
Rousseau, Rosalie ;
Gaultier, Aurelie ;
Pogu, Corinne ;
Edwards, Adrian ;
Nguyen, Jean-Michel .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2018, 27 (03) :227-236
[26]   The role of disgust as an emotional barrier to colorectal cancer screening participation: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Scaglioni, Giulia ;
Guidetti, Margherita ;
Cavazza, Nicoletta .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2023, 38 (03) :389-408
[27]   Performance of colorectal cancer screening in the European Union Member States: data from the second European screening report [J].
Senore, Carlo ;
Basu, Partha ;
Anttila, Ahti ;
Ponti, Antonio ;
Tomatis, Mariano ;
Vale, Diama Bhadra ;
Ronco, Gugliemo ;
Soerjomataram, Isabelle ;
Primic-Zakelj, Maja ;
Riggi, Emilia ;
Dillner, Joakim ;
Elfstrom, Miriam Klara ;
Lonnberg, Stefan ;
Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy ;
Segnan, Nereo .
GUT, 2019, 68 (07) :1232-1244
[28]   Optimising colorectal cancer screening acceptance: a review [J].
Senore, Carlo ;
Inadomi, John ;
Segnan, Nereo ;
Bellisario, Cristina ;
Hassan, Cesare .
GUT, 2015, 64 (07) :1158-1177
[29]   An international measure of awareness and beliefs about cancer: development and testing of the ABC [J].
Simon, Alice E. ;
Forbes, Lindsay J. L. ;
Boniface, David ;
Warburton, Fiona ;
Brain, Kate E. ;
Dessaix, Anita ;
Donnelly, Michael ;
Haynes, Kerry ;
Hvidberg, Line ;
Lagerlund, Magdalena ;
Petermann, Lisa ;
Tishelman, Carol ;
Vedsted, Peter ;
Vigmostad, Maria Nyre ;
Wardle, Jane ;
Ramirez, Amanda J. .
BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (06)
[30]   The associations between objective numeracy and colorectal cancer screening knowledge, attitudes and defensive processing in a deprived community sample [J].
Smith, Samuel G. ;
Kobayashi, Lindsay C. ;
Wolf, Michael S. ;
Raine, Rosalind ;
Wardle, Jane ;
von Wagner, Christian .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 21 (08) :1665-1675