The role of defensive information processing in population-based colorectal cancer screening uptake

被引:7
作者
Clarke, Nicholas [1 ,10 ]
Hayes, Louise [2 ]
McQueen, Amy [3 ,4 ]
Gallagher, Pamela [1 ]
Kearney, Patricia M. [5 ]
McNamara, Deirdre [6 ]
O'Morain, Colm A. [7 ]
von Wagner, Christian [8 ]
Mooney, Therese [9 ]
Sharp, Linda [2 ]
机构
[1] Dublin City Univ, Sch Psychol, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Newcastle Univ, Populat Hlth Sci Inst, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[3] Washington Univ St Louis, Brown Sch, Hlth Commun Res Lab, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Washington Univ St Louis, Sch Med, Div Gen Med Sci, St Louis, MO USA
[5] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Publ Hlth, Cork, Ireland
[6] Adelaide & Meath Hosp, Dept Clin Med, Dublin, Ireland
[7] Trinity Coll Dublin, Fac Hlth Sci, Dublin, Ireland
[8] UCL, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London, England
[9] Natl Screening Serv, Dublin, Ireland
[10] Dublin City Univ, Sch Psychol, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
colorectal cancer screening; defensive information processing; fecal immunochemical test; participation; uptake; FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TEST; FIT; PARTICIPATION; PROGRAMS; GENDER;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.34603
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundInternationally, colorectal cancer screening participation remains low despite the availability of home-based testing and numerous interventions to increase uptake. To be effective, interventions should be based on an understanding of what influences individuals' decisions about screening participation. This study investigates the association of defensive information processing (DIP) with fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer screening uptake. MethodsRegression modeling of data from a cross-sectional survey within a population-based FIT screening program was conducted. The survey included the seven subdomains of the McQueen DIP measure. The primary outcome variable was the uptake status (screening user or nonuser). Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for screening nonuse by DIP (sub)domain score, with adjustments made for sociodemographic and behavioral factors associated with uptake. ResultsHigher scores (equating to greater defensiveness) on all DIP domains were significantly associated with lower uptake in the model adjusted for sociodemographic factors. In the model with additional adjustments for behavioral factors, the suppression subdomains of "deny immediacy to be tested" (OR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.65; p < .001) and "self-exemption" (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96; p < .001) independently predicted nonuse of FIT-based screening. ConclusionsThis is the first study outside the United States that has identified DIP as a barrier to colorectal cancer screening uptake, and it is the first focused specifically on FIT-based screening. The findings suggest that two suppression barriers, namely denying the immediacy to be tested and self-exempting oneself from screening, may be promising targets for future interventions to improve uptake.
引用
收藏
页码:1253 / 1260
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[11]   Equal access to colorectal cancer screening [J].
Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise ;
Dekker, Evelien .
LANCET, 2016, 387 (10020) :724-726
[12]   Geographic variation in compliance with Australian colorectal cancer screening programs: the role of attitudinal and cognitive traits [J].
Goodwin, Belinda C. ;
March, Sonja ;
Ireland, Michael ;
Williams, Fiona Crawford ;
Manksi, Donna ;
Ford, Martelle ;
Dunn, Jeff .
RURAL AND REMOTE HEALTH, 2019, 19 (03)
[13]   Factors associated with use and non-use of the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Response to a 2012 outreach screening program: a survey study [J].
Gordon, Nancy P. ;
Green, Beverly B. .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 15
[14]   Reasons for never and intermittent completion of colorectal cancer screening after receiving multiple rounds of mailed fecal tests [J].
Green, Beverly B. ;
BlueSpruce, June ;
Tuzzio, Leah ;
Vernon, Sally W. ;
Shay, L. Aubree ;
Catz, Sheryl L. .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 17
[15]   Systematic Review and Meta-study Synthesis of Qualitative Studies Evaluating Facilitators and Barriers to Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening [J].
Honein-AbouHaidar, Gladys N. ;
Kastner, Monika ;
Vuong, Vincent ;
Perrier, Laure ;
Daly, Corinne ;
Rabeneck, Linda ;
Straus, Sharon ;
Baxter, Nancy N. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2016, 25 (06) :907-917
[16]   Population health interventions to improve colorectal cancer screening by fecal immunochemical tests: A systematic review [J].
Issaka, Rachel B. ;
Avila, Patrick ;
Whitaker, Evans ;
Bent, Stephen ;
Somsouk, Ma .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 118 :113-121
[17]   Psychological predictors of intention and avoidance of attending organized mammography screening in Norway: applying the Extended Parallel Process Model [J].
Ivanova, Anna ;
Kvalem, Ingela Lundin .
BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
[18]   The health belief model and colorectal cancer screening in the general population: A systematic review [J].
Lau, Jerrald ;
Lim, Tian-Zhi ;
Wong, Gretel Jianlin ;
Tan, Ker-Kan .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2020, 20
[19]   Reactions to online colorectal cancer risk estimates among a nationally representative sample of adults who have never been screened [J].
Lipkus, Isaac M. ;
Johnson, Constance M. ;
Amarasekara, Sathya ;
Pan, Wei ;
Updegraff, John A. .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2018, 41 (03) :289-298
[20]   Improving Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Intervention to Compare Screener vs. Survivor Narratives [J].
McQueen, A. M. Y. ;
Caburnay, Charlene ;
Kreuter, Matthew ;
Sefko, Julianne .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2019, 24 (02) :141-155