Improving Risk Stratification for Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction

被引:13
作者
Taggart, Caelan [1 ]
Monterrubio-Gomez, Karla [2 ]
Roos, Andreas [3 ,4 ]
Boeddinghaus, Jasper [1 ]
Kimenai, Dorien M. [1 ]
Kadesjo, Erik [3 ,5 ]
Bularga, Anda [1 ]
Wereski, Ryan [1 ]
Ferry, Amy [1 ]
Lowry, Matthew [1 ]
Anand, Atul [1 ]
Lee, Kuan Ken [1 ]
Doudesis, Dimitrios [1 ,5 ]
Manolopoulou, Ioanna [7 ]
Nestelberger, Thomas [8 ]
Koechlin, Luca [8 ]
Lopez-Ayala, Pedro [8 ]
Mueller, Christian [8 ]
Mills, Nicholas L. [1 ,6 ]
Vallejos, Catalina A. [2 ,9 ]
Chapman, Andrew R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, BHF Ctr Cardiovasc Sci, Edinburgh, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Inst Genet & Canc, MRC Human Genet Unit, Edinburgh, Scotland
[3] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med, Clin Epidemiol Div, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Emergency & Reparat Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Univ Edinburgh, Usher Inst, Edinburgh, Scotland
[7] UCL, Dept Stat Sci, London, England
[8] Univ Hosp Basel, Cardiovasc Res Inst Basel CRIB, Basel, Switzerland
[9] Alan Turing Inst, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
risk prediction; type 2 myocardial infarction; SENSITIVITY CARDIAC TROPONIN; DIAGNOSIS; SCORE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2022.10.025
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Despite poor cardiovascular outcomes, there are no dedicated, validated risk stratification tools to guide investigation or treatment in type 2 myocardial infarction. OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to derive and validate a risk stratification tool for the prediction of death or future myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 myocardial infarction. METHODS The T2-risk score was developed in a prospective multicenter cohort of consecutive patients with type 2 myocardial infarction. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed for the primary outcome of myocardial infarction or death at 1 year using variables selected a priori based on clinical importance. Discrimination was assessed by area under the receiving-operating characteristic curve (AUC). Calibration was investigated graphically. The tool was validated in a single-center cohort of consecutive patients and in a multicenter cohort study from sites across Europe. RESULTS There were 1,121, 250, and 253 patients in the derivation, single-center, and multicenter validation cohorts, with the primary outcome occurring in 27% (297 of 1,121), 26% (66 of 250), and 14% (35 of 253) of patients, respec-tively. The T2-risk score incorporating age, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, myocardial ischemia on electrocardiogram, heart rate, anemia, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and maximal cardiac troponin concentration had good discrimination (AUC: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.73-0.79) for the primary outcome and was well calibrated. Discrimination was similar in the consecutive patient (AUC: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.77-0.88) and multicenter (AUC: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.64-0.83) cohorts. T2-risk provided improved discrimination over the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events 2.0 risk score in all cohorts. CONCLUSIONS The T2-risk score performed well in different health care settings and could help clinicians to prog-nosticate, as well as target investigation and preventative therapies more effectively. (High-Sensitivity Troponin in the Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome [High-STEACS]; NCT01852123) (J Am Coll Cardiol 2023;81:156-168) (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foun-dation. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 168
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Risk Scores for Clinical Risk Stratification of Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain but No Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review
    O'Rielly, Connor M.
    Harrison, Tyrone G.
    Andruchow, James E.
    Ronksley, Paul E.
    Sajobi, Tolu
    Robertson, Helen Lee
    Lorenzetti, Diane
    McRae, Andrew D.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 39 (03) : 304 - 310
  • [12] Risk Stratification of Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Analysis Based on the SCAI Definition
    Zhang, Dong
    Li, Yiping
    Yin, Dong
    He, Yuan
    Chen, Changzhe
    Song, Chenxi
    Yan, Ruohua
    Zhu, Chen'gang
    Xu, Bo
    Dou, Kefei
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 89 : 534 - 540
  • [13] Atherothrombotic Risk Stratification and the Efficacy and Safety of Vorapaxar in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease and Previous Myocardial Infarction
    Bohula, Erin A.
    Bonaca, Marc P.
    Braunwald, Eugene
    Aylward, Philip E.
    Corbalan, Ramon
    De Ferrari, Gaetano M.
    He, Ping
    Lewis, Basil S.
    Merlini, Piera A.
    Murphy, Sabina A.
    Sabatine, Marc S.
    Scirica, Benjamin M.
    Morrow, David A.
    CIRCULATION, 2016, 134 (04) : 304 - +
  • [14] Effect of Definition on Incidence and Prognosis of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction
    Nestelberger, Thomas
    Boeddinghaus, Jasper
    Badertscher, Patrick
    Twerenbold, Raphael
    Wildi, Karin
    Breitenbuecher, Dominik
    Sabti, Zaid
    Puelacher, Christian
    Gimenez, Maria Rubini
    Kozhuharov, Nikola
    Strebel, Ivo
    Sazgary, Lorraine
    Schneider, Deborah
    Jann, Janina
    de lavallaz, Jeanne du Fay
    Miro, Oscar
    Javier Martin-Sanchez, F.
    Morawiec, Beata
    Kawecki, Damian
    Muzyk, Piotr
    Keller, Dagmar I.
    Geigy, Nicolas
    Osswald, Stefan
    Reichlin, Tobias
    Mueller, Christian
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (13) : 1558 - 1568
  • [16] The Many Faces of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction
    Januzzi, James L.
    Sandoval, Yader
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (13) : 1569 - 1572
  • [17] Improving Risk Stratification of Patients With Chest Pain in the Emergency Department
    Altunoz, Yusuf
    Yilmaz, Banu Karakus
    Topcu, Hatice
    Cetinkal, Gokhan
    Ikizceli, Ibrahim
    Yigit, Yavuz
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [18] Characteristics and Outcomes of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction
    Coscia, Tania
    Nestelberger, Thomas
    Boeddinghaus, Jasper
    Lopez-Ayala, Pedro
    Koechlin, Luca
    Miro, Oscar
    Keller, Dagmar, I
    Strebel, Ivo
    Sanchez, Ana Yufera
    Okamura, Bernhard
    Wussler, Desiree
    Shrestha, Samyut
    Hausknecht, Katharina
    Martin-Sanchez, F. Javier
    Christ, Michael
    Kawecki, Damian
    Twerenbold, Raphael
    Wildi, Karin
    Gimenez, Maria Rubini
    Mueller, Christian
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 7 (04) : 427 - 434
  • [19] Risk Factors and Outcome Variables of Cardiorenal Syndrome Type 1 in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients
    She, Chang-Shou
    Deng, Yue-Lin
    Huang, Guo-Qing
    Cheng, Chao
    Zhang, Fang-Jie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2022, 15 : 1565 - 1573
  • [20] Atherothrombotic risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction: The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Secondary Prevention in the light of the French Registry of Acute ST Elevation or non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction registries
    Puymirat, Etienne
    Bonaca, Marc
    Fumery, Maxime
    Tea, Victoria
    Aissaoui, Nadia
    Lemesles, Gilles
    Bonello, Laurent
    Ducrocq, Gregory
    Cayla, Guillaume
    Ferrieres, Jean
    Schiele, Francois
    Simon, Tabassome
    Danchin, Nicolas
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 42 (02) : 227 - 234