Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data of 122 989 Patients With 592 952 Patient-Years

被引:12
作者
Sa, Michel Pompeu [1 ,2 ]
Jacquemyn, Xander [3 ]
van den Eynde, Jef [3 ]
Chu, Danny [1 ,2 ]
Serna-Gallegos, Derek [1 ,2 ]
Ebels, Tjark [4 ]
Clavel, Marie-Annick [5 ,6 ]
Pibarot, Philippe [5 ,6 ]
Sultan, Ibrahim [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Pittsburgh, Para 15213, Suriname
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, UPMC Heart & Vasc Inst, Med Ctr, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Cardiovasc Sci, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Inst Univ Cardiol & Pneumol Quebec, Ctr Rech, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[6] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | 2024年 / 13卷 / 07期
关键词
aortic valve replacement; cardiac surgical procedures; cardiovascular surgical procedures; heart valve diseases; heart valve prosthesis implantation; meta-analysis; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; LEFT-VENTRICULAR MASS; HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; MECHANICAL PROSTHESES; CARDIAC EVENTS; HEART-FAILURE; Y-INCISION;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.123.033176
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: It remains controversial whether prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) impacts long-term outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement. We aimed to evaluate the association of PPM with mortality, rehospitalizations, and aortic valve reinterventions. Methods and results: We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data of studies published by March 2023 (according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Sixty-five studies met our eligibility criteria and included 122 989 patients (any PPM: 68 332 patients, 55.6%). At 25 years of follow-up, the survival rates were 11.8% and 20.6% in patients with and without any PPM, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16 [95% CI, 1.13-1.18], P<0.001). At 20 years of follow-up, the survival rates were 19.5%, 12.1%, and 8.8% in patients with no, moderate, and severe PPM, respectively (moderate versus no PPM: HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.06-1.11], P<0.001; severe versus no PPM: HR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.24-1.35], P<0.001). PPM was associated with higher risk of cardiac death, heart failure-related hospitalizations, and aortic valve reinterventions over time (P<0.001). Statistically significant associations between PPM and worse survival were observed regardless of valve type (bioprosthetic versus mechanical valves), contemporary PPM definitions unadjusted and adjusted for body mass index, and PPM quantification method (in vitro, in vivo, Doppler echocardiography). Our meta-regression analysis revealed that populations with more women tend to have higher HRs for all-cause death associated with PPM. Conclusions: The results of the present study suggest that any degree of PPM is associated with poorer long-term outcomes following surgical aortic valve replacement and provide support for implementation of preventive strategies to avoid PPM after surgical aortic valve replacement.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 101 条
  • [1] Durability of prostheses for transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    Arsalan, Mani
    Walther, Thomas
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (06) : 360 - 367
  • [2] Auffret Vincent, 2016, J Heart Valve Dis, V25, P543
  • [3] A tutorial on frailty models
    Balan, Theodor A.
    Putter, Hein
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (11) : 3424 - 3454
  • [4] Patient-prosthesis mismatch following aortic valve replacement
    Bilkhu, Rajdeep
    Jahangiri, Marjan
    Otto, Catherine M.
    [J]. HEART, 2019, 105 : S28 - S33
  • [5] Impact of the indexed effective orifice area on mid-term cardiac-related mortality after aortic valve replacement
    Bleiziffer, Sabine
    Ali, Ayyaz
    Hettich, Ina M.
    Akdere, Deniz
    Laubender, Ruediger P.
    Ruzicka, Daniel
    Boehm, Johannes
    Lange, Ruediger
    Eichinger, Walter
    [J]. HEART, 2010, 96 (11) : 865 - 871
  • [6] Factors Determining Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch after Aortic Valve Replacement - A Prospective Cohort Study
    Bonderman, Diana
    Graf, Alexandra
    Kammerlander, Andreas A.
    Kocher, Alfred
    Laufer, Guenter
    Lang, Irene M.
    Mascherbauer, Julia
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):
  • [7] Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in Bovine Pericardial Aortic Valves Evaluation Using 3 Different Modalities and Associated Medium-Term Outcomes
    Chacko, Satish Jacob
    Ansari, Asimul H.
    McCarthy, Patrick M.
    Malaisrie, S. Chris
    Andrei, Adin-Cristian
    Li, Zhi
    Lee, Richard
    McGee, Edwin
    Bonow, Robert O.
    Puthumana, Jyothy J.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2013, 6 (05) : 776 - 783
  • [8] Aortic Valve Replacement with Smaller Prostheses in Elderly Patients: Does Patient Prosthetic Mismatch Affect Outcomes?
    Concistre, Giovanni
    Dell'Aquila, Angelo
    Pansini, Stefano
    Corsini, Biagino
    Costigliolo, Tiziano
    Piccardo, Alessandro
    Gallo, Alina
    Passerone, Giancarlo
    Regesta, Tommaso
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2013, 28 (04) : 341 - 347
  • [9] Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valves for Patients With a Small Aortic Root: A Single-Center Experience
    Coti, Iuliana
    Haberl, Thomas
    Scherzer, Sabine
    Shabanian, Shiva
    Binder, Thomas
    Kocher, Alfred
    Laufer, Guenther
    Andreas, Martin
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 110 (05) : 1549 - 1556
  • [10] Defining Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch and Its Effect on Survival in Patients With Impaired Ejection Fraction
    Cotoni, David A.
    Palac, Robert T.
    Dacey, Lawrence J.
    O'Rourke, Daniel J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 91 (03) : 692 - 699