AutoFlow® (volume-guaranteed mode) versus volume-controlled ventilation for the laparoscopic surgery with BlockBuster supraglottic airway: A randomized controlled trial

被引:0
作者
Chhanwal, Heena Sunil [1 ,4 ]
Kheskani, Divya N. [2 ]
Shah, Amit [3 ]
Patel, Ankita [4 ]
Parita, Gandhi
Solanki, Rekha Nilesh [2 ]
Singh, Aayushi
机构
[1] GCSMCH & RC, Dept Anaesthesia, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
[2] Gujarat Canc Res Inst, Dept Anaesthesia, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
[3] Kailash Canc Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
[4] B-103 Shreedhar Nest,Near Chitwan Flats,Koteshwar, Ahmadabad 380005, Gujarat, India
关键词
AutoFlow (R); BlockBuster (TM); laparoscopic surgery; volume-controlled ventilation; LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; PRESSURE; ASSOCIATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.4103/TheIAForum.TheIAForum_62_23
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Supraglottic airway devices used in laparoscopic surgeries must be efficient to counter the increased peak airway pressure (PAWP) and airway leakage that can occur in laparoscopic surgeries. Hence, the implication of AutoFlow in ventilator strategy is propounded nowadays that facilitates low PAWP and high dynamic compliance to achieve targeted tidal volume and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2). BlockBuster (TM) Laryngeal mask furnishing minimum airway leak. The primary objective was to compare PAWP using the two modes of ventilation through the BlockBuster LMA after intubation, pneumoperitoneum, and Trendelenburg position. The secondary objective was to observe hemodynamic vitals. Methodology: In this single-center randomized controlled trial, we recruited 80 American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I and II adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgeries. They were randomized by computer-generated method into two groups: volume-controlled AutoFlow (R) (VCAF) and volume-controlled (VC) group. Ventilation settings for both groups set to tidal volume 5-6 ml/kg of predicted body weight, positive end-expiratory pressure 5 cm H2O, I: E ratio 1:2, and respiratory rate 12-16/min to maintain targeted ETCO2 of 30-35 cm H2O. Intraabdominal pressure was set to 14 mmHg during pneumoperitoneum and 15 degrees Trendelenburg position. Results: Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables and t-test for categorical variables. Data were presented as median (interquartile range). P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. During laparoscopic surgeries with BlockBuster (TM) PAWP at pneumoperitoneum was (20 cm H2O vs. 27 cm H2O) and Trendelenburg position (19 cm H2O vs. 27 cm H2O) was significant lower with VCAF (AutoFlow (R) ventilation) than with VC (P < 0.05). Conclusion: PAWP is significantly low in AutoFlow mode as compared to volume control mode with BlockBuster LMA. In addition, LMA BlockBuster provides good sealing pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 129
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation in steep Trendelenburg position for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Choi, Eun Mi
    Na, Sungwon
    Choi, Seung Ho
    An, Jiwon
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Oh, Young Jun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2011, 23 (03) : 183 - 188
  • [42] Effect of the Volume of Fluids Administered on Intraoperative Oliguria in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Matot, Idit
    Paskaleva, Radostina
    Eid, Luminita
    Cohen, Keren
    Khalaileh, Abed
    Elazary, Ram
    Keidar, Andrei
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2012, 147 (03) : 228 - 234
  • [43] Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation in the prone position for robot-assisted esophagectomy
    Yong Seon Choi
    Jae Kwang Shim
    Sungwon Na
    Seung Bum Hong
    Yong Woo Hong
    Young Jun Oh
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2009, 23 : 2286 - 2291
  • [44] The Effect of Pressure-controlled Ventilation on Pulmonary Mechanics in the Prone Position During Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Comparison With Volume-controlled Ventilation
    Jo, Youn Yi
    Kim, Ji Young
    Kwak, Young Lan
    Kim, Yong Beom
    Kwak, Hyun Jeong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 24 (01) : 14 - 18
  • [45] Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation in the prone position for robot-assisted esophagectomy
    Choi, Yong Seon
    Shim, Jae Kwang
    Na, Sungwon
    Hong, Seung Bum
    Hong, Yong Woo
    Oh, Young Jun
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (10): : 2286 - 2291
  • [46] Effects of pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed on airway pressure, oxygenation, and postoperative complications in one-lung ventilation: a prospective randomized-controlled study
    Sahutoglu, Cengiz
    Kocabas, Seden
    Askar, Fatma Zekiye
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (12): : 13681 - 13688
  • [47] Time to Effective Ventilation in Neonatal Manikins with a Supraglottic Airway vs. a Facemask: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sivakumar, Nithya
    Newman-Lindsay, Shoshana
    Sankaran, Deepika
    Lakshminrusimha, Satyan
    Donohue, Lee
    [J]. CHILDREN-BASEL, 2023, 10 (03):
  • [48] A clinical trial of volume- versus pressure-controlled intraoperative ventilation during laparoscopic bariatric surgeries
    Ghodraty, Mohammad Reza
    Pournajafian, Ali Reza
    Tavoosian, Sina Dokht
    Khatibi, Ali
    Safari, Saeed
    Motlagh, Soudabeh Djalali
    Abhari, Mariam Biglari
    Shafighnia, Shora
    Porhomayon, Jahan
    Nader, Nader D.
    [J]. SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2021, 17 (01) : 81 - 89
  • [49] Impact of volume guarantee on synchronized ventilation in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial
    Duman, Nuray
    Tuzun, Funda
    Sutcuoglu, Sumer
    Yesilirmak, Cemile Didem
    Kumral, Abdullah
    Ozkan, Hasan
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 38 (08) : 1358 - 1364
  • [50] Comparative study of pressure- and volume-controlled ventilation on stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery
    Lee, Ji Yeon
    Park, Hee Yeon
    Jung, Wol Seon
    Jo, Youn Yi
    Kwak, Hyun Jeong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 27 (05) : 531.e9 - 531.e14