AutoFlow® (volume-guaranteed mode) versus volume-controlled ventilation for the laparoscopic surgery with BlockBuster supraglottic airway: A randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Chhanwal, Heena Sunil [1 ,4 ]
Kheskani, Divya N. [2 ]
Shah, Amit [3 ]
Patel, Ankita [4 ]
Parita, Gandhi
Solanki, Rekha Nilesh [2 ]
Singh, Aayushi
机构
[1] GCSMCH & RC, Dept Anaesthesia, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
[2] Gujarat Canc Res Inst, Dept Anaesthesia, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
[3] Kailash Canc Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
[4] B-103 Shreedhar Nest,Near Chitwan Flats,Koteshwar, Ahmadabad 380005, Gujarat, India
关键词
AutoFlow (R); BlockBuster (TM); laparoscopic surgery; volume-controlled ventilation; LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; PRESSURE; ASSOCIATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.4103/TheIAForum.TheIAForum_62_23
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Supraglottic airway devices used in laparoscopic surgeries must be efficient to counter the increased peak airway pressure (PAWP) and airway leakage that can occur in laparoscopic surgeries. Hence, the implication of AutoFlow in ventilator strategy is propounded nowadays that facilitates low PAWP and high dynamic compliance to achieve targeted tidal volume and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2). BlockBuster (TM) Laryngeal mask furnishing minimum airway leak. The primary objective was to compare PAWP using the two modes of ventilation through the BlockBuster LMA after intubation, pneumoperitoneum, and Trendelenburg position. The secondary objective was to observe hemodynamic vitals. Methodology: In this single-center randomized controlled trial, we recruited 80 American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I and II adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgeries. They were randomized by computer-generated method into two groups: volume-controlled AutoFlow (R) (VCAF) and volume-controlled (VC) group. Ventilation settings for both groups set to tidal volume 5-6 ml/kg of predicted body weight, positive end-expiratory pressure 5 cm H2O, I: E ratio 1:2, and respiratory rate 12-16/min to maintain targeted ETCO2 of 30-35 cm H2O. Intraabdominal pressure was set to 14 mmHg during pneumoperitoneum and 15 degrees Trendelenburg position. Results: Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables and t-test for categorical variables. Data were presented as median (interquartile range). P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. During laparoscopic surgeries with BlockBuster (TM) PAWP at pneumoperitoneum was (20 cm H2O vs. 27 cm H2O) and Trendelenburg position (19 cm H2O vs. 27 cm H2O) was significant lower with VCAF (AutoFlow (R) ventilation) than with VC (P < 0.05). Conclusion: PAWP is significantly low in AutoFlow mode as compared to volume control mode with BlockBuster LMA. In addition, LMA BlockBuster provides good sealing pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 129
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AutoFlow® versus volume-controlled ventilation for laparoscopic gynecological surgery using LMA® ProSeal™: a randomized controlled trial
    Nakanishi, Toshiyuki
    Sakamoto, Seishi
    Yoshimura, Manabu
    Toriumi, Takashi
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [2] Evaluation of the Effect of Pressure-Controlled Ventilation-Volume Guaranteed Mode vs. Volume-Controlled Ventilation Mode on Atelectasis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Turan Civraz, Ayse Zeynep
    Saracoglu, Ayten
    Saracoglu, Kemal Tolga
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (10):
  • [3] Comparison of volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation volume guaranteed during laparoscopic surgery in Trendelenburg position
    Assad, Osama M.
    El Sayed, Ayman A.
    Khalil, Mohamed A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2016, 34 : 55 - 61
  • [4] Comparison between pressure-controlled ventilation with volume-guaranteed mode and volume-controlled mode in one-lung ventilation in infants undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
    Wang, Yu-Ping
    Wei, Ying
    Chen, Xiu-Ying
    Zhang, Long-Xin
    Zhou, Min
    Wang, Jing
    TRANSLATIONAL PEDIATRICS, 2021, 10 (10) : 2514 - 2520
  • [5] Comparative study of ventilation techniques with supraglottic airway devices in cats: volume-controlled vs pressure-controlled techniques
    Niyatiwatchanchai, Nutawan
    Rattanathanya, Hathaipat
    Thengchaisri, Naris
    JOURNAL OF FELINE MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2024, 26 (01)
  • [6] Comparison of Volume-Guaranteed or -Targeted, Pressure-Controlled Ventilation with Volume-Controlled Ventilation during Elective Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Schick, Volker
    Dusse, Fabian
    Eckardt, Ronny
    Kerkhoff, Steffen
    Commotio, Simone
    Hinkelbein, Jochen
    Mathes, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (06) : 1 - 16
  • [7] Use of volume controlled vs. pressure controlled volume guaranteed ventilation in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with laryngeal mask airway
    Wang, Ping
    Zhao, Shihao
    Gao, Zongbin
    Hu, Jun
    Lu, Yao
    Chen, Jinbao
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [8] Use of volume controlled vs. pressure controlled volume guaranteed ventilation in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with laryngeal mask airway
    Ping Wang
    Shihao Zhao
    Zongbin Gao
    Jun Hu
    Yao Lu
    Jinbao Chen
    BMC Anesthesiology, 21
  • [9] Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation on respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: randomized clinical
    Ozyurt, Erhan
    Kavakli, Ali Sait
    Ozturk, Nilgun Kavrut
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2019, 69 (06): : 546 - 552
  • [10] Prospective randomized trial comparing pressure-controlled ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation in ARDS
    Esteban, A
    Alía, I
    Gordo, F
    de Pablo, R
    Suarez, J
    González, G
    Blanco, J
    CHEST, 2000, 117 (06) : 1690 - 1696