A Comparison Study of Predictive Models for Electricity Demand in a Diverse Urban Environment

被引:5
作者
Pesantez, Jorge E. [1 ]
Li, Binbin [2 ]
Lee, Christopher [3 ]
Zhao, Zhizhen [3 ]
Butala, Mark [2 ]
Stillwell, Ashlynn S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ, Dept Civil & Geomat Engn, 2320 E San Ramon Ave M-S EE94, Fresno, CA 93740 USA
[2] Zhejiang Univ, ZJU UIUC Inst, Haining, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, 306 Wright St,MC-702, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 205 North Mathews Ave, MC-250, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
Forecasting; Regression; Machine learning; Demand management; Feature importance; SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION; HYBRID FORECASTING-MODEL; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; WAVELET TRANSFORM; FEATURE-SELECTION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; RANDOM FOREST; LOAD; DECOMPOSITION; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2023.129142
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The increasing population migration to urban and peri-urban areas increases basic service needs for cities worldwide. Residential electricity demand increases with more customers and varies with novel uses, such as charging electric vehicles, which may add additional dynamics to the residential electricity demand profile. Widespread installation of smart electricity meters provides fine temporal resolution data reflecting current demands and supports predicting future demands. As part of a demand-side management program, understanding the main drivers of current electricity usage based on demand-driven and exogenous predictors represents a valuable tool for utilities facing new demand scenarios. This work presents the application of multiple models to forecast electricity demand based on the input data and the forecasting horizon. Models with exogenous variables as predictors are part of the input-output category, including a Feed Forward Neural Network, Random Forest, and a Linear Gaussian State Space model. The second category is demand-driven models, where predictors include only previous demand values. The demand-driven models in our analysis include a univariate Nonlinear Autoregressive Neural Network and a Linear Gaussian State Space. Using smart electricity meter data from the greater Chicago area, we compare the performance of the models on two different types of accounts: single-and multi-family residential users when forecasting one and multiple steps. Results show that the Linear Gaussian model reports an R2 of 0.99 compared to an average R2 of 0.92 from the Feed Forward Neural Networks and Random Forest when forecasting single-and multi-family electricity demand one step ahead. However, Nonlinear Autoregressive Neural Networks report an average R2 of 0.85 compared to the Linear Gaussian R2 of 0.58 when forecasting 48 steps. We also found that the most important predictors for single-family demand are temporal variables like weekdays, working and non-working days, and day hours. For multi-family demand, electricity demand at the same hour as the previous week replaces weekdays as a significant predictor. Different forecasting models can assist utilities and city planners to manage demand under different and novel residential electricity usage conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Temperature variation and urban electricity consumption in China: Implications for demand management and planning
    Yang, Shubo
    Jahanger, Atif
    Awan, Ashar
    UTILITIES POLICY, 2024, 90
  • [42] An exploratory study on the impact of physical and geospatial characteristics of the urban built environment on the buildings annual electricity usage
    Mohammadi, Saleh
    de Vries, Bauke
    Rafiee, Azarakhsh
    Esfandiari, Masoud
    Dias, Eduardo
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2021, 40
  • [43] A comparison of univariate methods for forecasting electricity demand up to a day ahead
    Taylor, JW
    de Menezes, LM
    McSharry, PE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2006, 22 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [44] The Risk of Residential Peak Electricity Demand: A Comparison of Five European Countries
    Torriti, Jacopo
    ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (03):
  • [45] Superiority of the Neural Network Dynamic Regression Models for Ontario Electricity Demand Forecasting
    Bowala, Sulalitha
    Makhan, Mohammadreza
    Liang, You
    Thavaneswaran, Aerambamoorthy
    Appadoo, Srimantoorao S.
    2022 IEEE CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING (CCECE), 2022, : 182 - 187
  • [46] A comparison of periodic autoregressive and dynamic factor models in intraday energy demand forecasting
    Mestekemper, Thomas
    Kauermann, Goeran
    Smith, Michael S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2013, 29 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [47] Application of Improved GM(1,N) Models in Annual Electricity Demand Forecasting
    Li, X. B.
    Jing, Z. X.
    Wu, Q. H.
    2015 IEEE INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES - ASIA (ISGT ASIA), 2015,
  • [48] Comparison of Predictive Models for the Early Diagnosis of Diabetes
    Jahani, Meysam
    Mahdavi, Mahdi
    HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS RESEARCH, 2016, 22 (02) : 95 - 100
  • [49] Global vs. Local Models for Short-Term Electricity Demand Prediction in a Residential/Lodging Scenario
    Buonanno, Amedeo
    Caliano, Martina
    Pontecorvo, Antonino
    Sforza, Gianluca
    Valenti, Maria
    Graditi, Giorgio
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (06)
  • [50] Predictive performance of presence-only species distribution models: a benchmark study with reproducible code
    Valavi, Roozbeh
    Guillera-Arroita, Gurutzeta
    Lahoz-Monfort, Jose J.
    Elith, Jane
    ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 2022, 92 (01)