How do geriatricians evaluate decision-making ability for older adults with cognitive impairment? Results from an European survey

被引:5
作者
Tannou, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Gzil, Fabrice [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Kennelly, Sean P. [6 ]
Tournoy, Jos [7 ,8 ]
Frisardi, Vincenza [9 ]
Soysal, Pinar [10 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Rech Inst Univ Geriatrie Montreal, CIUSS Ctr Sud Ile Montreal, 4565 Rue Queen Mary, Montreal, PQ H3W1W5, Canada
[2] Univ Franche Comte, UR LINC, F-25000 Besancon, France
[3] Ecole Hautes Etud Sante Publ, F-35000 Rennes, France
[4] Espace Reflex Eth Ile Defrance, F-75000 Paris, France
[5] Univ Paris Saclay, Ctr Rech Epidemiol & Sante Populat, UMR Inserm 1018, F-94800 Villejuif, France
[6] Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Med, Dept Med Gerontol, Dublin, Ireland
[7] KU Leuven Univ Leuven, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Gerontol & Geriatr Unit, Louvain, Belgium
[8] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Geriatr Med, Louvain, Belgium
[9] AUSL IRCCS Reggio Emilia RE, Neuromotor Dept, Geriatr Unit, Louvain, Italy
[10] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Fac Med, Dept Geriatr Med, Adnan Menderes Bulvari Vatan Str, TR-34093 Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Aging; Decision-making; Ethics; Risk-taking; Cognitive impairment; CAPACITY; RISK; COMPETENCE; DEMENTIA;
D O I
10.1007/s41999-023-00852-4
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
ContextThe assessment of decision-making ability of older adults with cognitive impairment is a complex challenge that geriatricians often face in relation to risk-taking situations (driving, aging in place, financial decisions, etc.). However, there are no clear and consensual practice guidelines. An overview of current practices and needs seemed necessary.MethodsWe co-created and conducted an online survey to describe practice and knowledge, among European geriatricians. The survey was structured in 3 parts: a description of the professional's practice regarding cognitive impairment, a specific questionnaire about everyday risky decision-making evaluation and an investigation of the clinician's knowledge about relevant ethical and legal recommendations. Each part consisted of both multiple choice and open questions, analyzed through descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis methods.ResultsBased on the responses of 123 geriatricians across Europe, our survey showed that clinical interview is the cornerstone of geriatric assessment of decision-making ability of patients with mild to moderate dementia. When faced with risk-taking dilemma situations, geriatricians tend to favor a context of safety above autonomy, but they can support risky decision-making if it is consistent with the patient's previous lifestyle, depending on the degree of risk to self and others, on the decision-making ability assessed, and if there is some form of shared decision-making.ConclusionAssessing decision-making ability is challenging for geriatricians, who in our study relied more on their clinical interview and global cognitive tests than more in-depth evaluations. Supporting independent decision-making, when associated with risk-taking, requires better detection and anticipation shared with the patient environment. Key summary pointsAimDescribing usual practice when European geriatricians face decision-making ability evaluation, with specific focus on complex issues involving aging-in-place for people living with dementia.FindingsThe clinical interview is the cornerstone of geriatric assessment of decision-making ability of patients with mild to moderate dementia. Geriatrician can support daily-life risky decision-making if it is consistent with the patient's previous lifestyle, depending on the degree of risk to self and others, on the decision-making ability assessed, and if there is some form of shared decision-making.MessageThe assessment of the decision-making ability of older adults with mild to moderate dementia is challenging for geriatricians, who mainly rely on their clinical judgment.
引用
收藏
页码:953 / 960
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条