Initial experience of single-incision plus one port total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

被引:2
作者
Cai, He [1 ]
Zhang, Man [2 ]
Wang, Xin [1 ]
Cai, Yunqiang [1 ]
Peng, Bing [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Div Pancreat Surg, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Shangjin Nanfu Hosp, Dept Minimal Invas Surg, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Pancreatoduodenectomy; Laparoscopy; Single-incision plus one port; Pain score; Cosmetic result; INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; COLON-CANCER; SURGERY; RESECTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-023-02107-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe use of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (SILPD + 1) has been never reported, and its safety and efficacy remain unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of SILPD + 1 compared with those of conventional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (CLPD).MethodFifty-seven cases of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) were performed between November 2021, and March 2022. Among them, 10 cases of LPD were performed using a single-incision plus one-port device. Based on the same inclusion and exclusion criteria, 47 cases of LPD performed using traditional 5-trocar were included as a control group. The patient's demographic characteristics, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed.ResultsThree men and seven women were included in the SILPD + 1 group. All baseline parameters of both groups were comparable, except for age. Patients were younger in the SILPD + 1 group (47.2 & PLUSMN; 18.3 years vs. 60.6 & PLUSMN; 11.7 years, P = 0.05) than that in the CLPD group. Compared with the CLPD group, median operation time (222.5 (208.8-245.0) vs. 305.0 (256.0-37.0) min, P < 0.001) was shorter, median postoperative VAS scores on days 1-3 were lower, and median cosmetic score (21.0 (19.0-23.5) vs. 17.0 (16.0-20.0), P = 0.026) was higher one month after the surgery in the SILPD + 1 group. The estimated blood loss, conversion rate, blood-transfusion rate, exhaust time, time of drainage tube removal, postoperative hospital stays, and perioperative complications were comparable between the two groups.ConclusionIn a high-volume LPD center, SILPD + 1 is safe and feasible for well-selected patients without increasing the operation time and complications. It even has the advantages of reduced postoperative pain and improved cosmetic results.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a preliminary experience
    Elie Chouillard
    Arnaud Dache
    Adriana Torcivia
    Nada Helmy
    Ivan Ruseykin
    Andrew Gumbs
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2010, 24 : 1861 - 1865
  • [42] Single-incision robotic colectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: A matched case control study
    Chang, Tung-Cheng
    Lin, En-Kwang
    Lu, Yen-Jung
    Huang, Ming-Te
    Chen, Chien-Hsin
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 44 (05) : 749 - 754
  • [43] Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: initial experience using the single-incision triangulated umbilical surgery (SITUS) technique
    Horstmann, M.
    Kugler, M.
    Anastasiadis, A. G.
    Walcher, U.
    Herrmann, T.
    Nagele, U.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 30 (05) : 619 - 624
  • [44] Multidimensional analyses of the learning curve for single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer
    Li, Junmeng
    Wang, Yanan
    Liu, Dong
    Zhou, Haipeng
    Mou, Tingyu
    Li, Guoxin
    Deng, Haijun
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 117 (07) : 1386 - 1393
  • [45] Application of a commercial single-port device for robotic single-incision distal pancreatectomy: initial experience
    Peng, Cheng-Ming
    Liu, Hsin-Cheng
    Hsieh, Ching-Lung
    Yang, Yao-Kun
    Cheng, Teng-Chieh
    Chou, Ruey-Hwang
    Liu, Yi-Jui
    SURGERY TODAY, 2018, 48 (07) : 680 - 686
  • [46] Long-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer: a randomized controlled trial
    Zhang, Xuehua
    Yuan, Haitao
    Tan, Zilin
    Li, Gaohua
    Xu, Zhenzhao
    Zhou, Jinfan
    Fu, Jie
    Wu, Mingyi
    Xi, Jiafei
    Wang, Yanan
    BMC CANCER, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [47] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: The first Malaysian experience
    Siow, Sze Li
    Khor, Tze Wei
    Chea, Chan Hooi
    Azim, Nik Abdullah Nik
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 35 (01) : 23 - 28
  • [48] Single-incision laparoscopic ileorectal anastomosis
    Naqi, Syed Ali
    Smyth, James
    Mortensen, Neil
    Hompes, Roel
    Cahill, Ronan
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 16 (08) : O297 - O299
  • [49] Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Glove Port in Comparison With Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy SILC Using Glove Port
    Barband, Alireza
    Fakhree, Mohammad Bassir A.
    Kakaei, Farzad
    Daryani, Amir
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2012, 22 (01) : 17 - 20
  • [50] Single-Incision Plus One-Port Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection With Bilateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Case Report
    Tokuoka, Masayoshi
    Ide, Yoshihito
    Takeda, Mitsunobu
    Hashimoto, Yasuji
    Matsuyama, Jin
    Yokoyama, Shigekazu
    Morimoto, Takashi
    Fukushima, Yukio
    Nomura, Takashi
    Kodama, Ken
    Sasaki, Yo
    INTERNATIONAL SURGERY, 2015, 100 (01) : 15 - 20