Achievement of appropriate cesarean rates using Robson's 10-Group classification system in Brazilian private practice

被引:2
作者
Campos, Andrea Silveira de Queiroz [1 ]
Rattner, Daphne [2 ]
Diniz, Carmen Simone Grilo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Saude Publ, Av Doutor Arnaldo,715,2 Andar, BR-01246904 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Brasilia, Fac Ciencias Saude, Campus Univ Darcy Ribeiro, BR-70910900 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
Cesarean section rates; Supplementary health; Health Care Models; Patient-centered care; evidence-based practice; Humanized childbirth; Robson classification; SECTION TRENDS; C-MODEL; OBSTETRICS; COUNTRIES; PATHWAY;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-023-05803-2
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundIncreasing cesarean section (CS) rates are a global concern because they are related to higher maternal and neonatal complication rates and do not provide positive childbirth experiences. In 2019, Brazil ranked second globally, given its overall CS rate of 57%. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), populational CS rates of 10-15% are associated with decreased maternal, neonatal, and infant mortality rates. This study aimed to investigate whether multidisciplinary care following evidence-based protocols associated with a high motivation of both women and professionals for a vaginal birth leads to less overuse of CS in a Brazilian private practice (PP).MethodsThis cross-sectional study evaluated CS rates by Robson group for women who sought vaginal birth in a private practice in Brazil comparing with Swedish data. Collaborative care of midwives and obstetricians who adopted evidence-based guidelines was offered. CS rates, overall and by Robson group, contribution of each Robson group to the overall CS rate, clinical and nonclinical interventions, vaginal birth, pre-labor CS, and intrapartum CS proportions were estimated. The expected CS rate was calculated using the World Health Organization C-model tool. The analysis used Microsoft Excel and R Studio (version 1.2.1335. 2009-2019).ResultsThe PP overall CS rate was 15.1% (95%CI, 13.4-17.1%) versus the 19.8% (95%CI, 14.8-24.7%) rate expected by the WHO C-model tool. The population included 43.7% women in Robson Group 1 (nulliparous, single, cephalic, at term, spontaneous labor), 11.4% in Group 2 (nulliparous, single, cephalic, at term, induced labor or CS before labor), and 14.9% in Group 5 (multiparous women with previous CS), the greatest contributors to higher CS rates (75.4% of them). The Swedish overall CS rate was 17.9% (95%CI, 17.6-18.1%) in a population of 27% women in Robson Group 1, 10.7% in Group 2, and 9.2% in Group 5.ConclusionsMultidisciplinary care following evidence-based protocols, associated with high motivation of both women and professionals for vaginal birth, may lead to a significant and safe reduction of CS rates even in contexts such as Brazil, with high medicalization of obstetric care and excess CS.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   Using the Robson classification to assess caesarean section rates in Brazil: an observational study of more than 24 million births from 2011 to 2017 [J].
Paixao, Enny S. ;
Bottomley, Christian ;
Smeeth, Liam ;
da Costa, Maria Conceicao N. ;
Teixeira, Maria Gloria ;
Ichihara, Maria Yury ;
Gabrielli, Ligia ;
Barreto, Mauricio L. ;
Campbell, Oona M. R. .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)
[22]   The Birth of a Collaborative Model Obstetricians, Midwives, and Family Physicians [J].
Pecci, Christine Chang ;
Mottl-Santiago, Julie ;
Culpepper, Larry ;
Heffner, Linda ;
McMahan, Therese ;
Lee-Parritz, Aviva .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 39 (03) :323-+
[23]   Cesarean section trends in the Nordic Countries - a comparative analysis with the Robson classification [J].
Pyykonen, Aura ;
Gissler, Mika ;
Lokkegaard, Ellen ;
Bergholt, Thomas ;
Rasmussen, Steen C. ;
Smarason, Alexander ;
Bjarnadottir, Ragnheiour I. ;
Masdottir, Birna B. ;
Kallen, Karin ;
Klungsoyr, Kari ;
Albrechtsen, Susanne ;
Skjeldestad, Finn E. ;
Tapper, Anna-Maija .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2017, 96 (05) :607-616
[24]  
Raats M. M., 1992, Food Quality and Preference, V3, P89, DOI 10.1016/0950-3293(91)90028-D
[25]  
Rattner Daphne, 2016, Rev. Bras. Saude Mater. Infant., V16, P39, DOI 10.1590/1806-93042016000100005
[26]  
Ray A., 2017, J OBSTET GYNAECOL RE, V43, P36
[27]  
Robson M., 2001, Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review, V12, P23, DOI [10.1017/s0965539501000122, DOI 10.1017/S0965539501000122]
[28]   Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate [J].
Robson, Michael ;
Hartigan, Lucia ;
Murphy, Martina .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 27 (02) :297-308
[29]   Defensive medicine and cesarean sections in Brazil [J].
Rudey, Edson Luciano ;
Leal, Maria do Carmo ;
Rego, Guilhermina .
MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (01) :E24176
[30]   Cesarean section rates in Brazil Trend analysis using the Robson classification system [J].
Rudey, Edson Luciano ;
Leal, Maria do Carmo ;
Rego, Guilhermina .
MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (17) :E19880