Needle-free anesthetic polymeric device for dental anesthesia in children: A randomized clinical trial

被引:1
|
作者
Inacio, Gisele Carvalho [1 ]
Pedrazzi, Vinicius [2 ]
de Freitas, Osvaldo [3 ]
Ferreira Duarte, Maira Peres [3 ]
Bezerra da Silva, Raquel Assed [1 ]
Nelson-Filho, Paulo [1 ]
Garcia de Paula-Silva, Francisco Wanderley [1 ]
de Carvalho, Fabricio Kitazono [1 ]
Lucisano, Marilia Pacifico [1 ]
de Oueiroz, Alexandra Mussolino [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent Ribeirao Preto, Dept Pediat Dent, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent Ribeirao Preto, Dept Oral Rehabil, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Sch Pharmaceut Sci Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
关键词
FREE BUCCAL ANESTHESIA; AMINO AMIDE SALTS; COMPUTERIZED ANESTHESIA; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA; PAIN; AGE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate efficacy of an anesthetic mucoadhesive film with a polymeric device (PD) in promoting anesthesia compared to conventional local infiltration (LA) in children. Methods: 50 children aged 6-10 years (both genders) needing similar procedures on homologous teeth on the maxilla were included. The parents and children were asked about perception of dental treatment. The child's heart rate per minute (bpm) and blood pressure were evaluated before and after each anesthetic technique (AT) procedure. Anesthesia efficacy was measured by reporting pain using Wong-Baker Faces Scale. Children's behavior and AT preferences were also evaluated. Paired T-test, chi-square and Wilcoxon test were used for statistical comparisons. Results: Fear of anesthesia was reported by 50% of caregivers and by 66% of children. No difference was observed in systolic (P= 0.282) and diastolic (P= 0.251) blood pressure, comparing both AT. Difference was observed regarding the child's behavior when the PD was used (P= 0.0028). Evaluating the face scale, 74% of the children selected the "no pain" (face 0) (P< 0.0001) for PD, and 26% for LA. PD was preferred by 86% of children. Only 20% of the PD anesthesia needed to be complemented by LA. (Am J Dent 2023;36:69-74). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The polymeric device presented promising results since most children did not report pain and dental procedures could be performed without local infiltration.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 74
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Use of the Needle-free Jet Injection System With Buffered Lidocaine Device Does Not Change Intravenous Placement Success in Children in the Emergency Department
    Lunoe, Maren M.
    Drendel, Amy L.
    Brousseau, David C.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (04) : 447 - 451
  • [32] A randomized, controlled trial of the reciprocating procedure device for local anesthesia
    Nunez, Sharon E.
    Bedrick, Edward J.
    Kettwich, Sharon C.
    Kettwich, Lawrence G.
    Bankhurst, Arthur D.
    Sibbitt, Wilmer L., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 35 (02) : 119 - 125
  • [33] Effect of warming anesthetic on pain perception during dental injection: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial
    Christian Aravena, Pedro
    Barrientos, Camila
    Troncoso, Catalina
    Coronado, Cesar
    Sotelo-Hitschfeld, Pamela
    LOCAL AND REGIONAL ANESTHESIA, 2018, 11 : 9 - 13
  • [34] “Comparative study of conventional anesthesia technique versus computerized system anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial”
    S. Berrendero
    O. Hriptulova
    M. P. Salido
    F. Martínez-Rus
    G. Pradíes
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2021, 25 : 2307 - 2315
  • [35] Comparative study of conventional anesthesia technique versus computerized system anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial
    Berrendero, S.
    Hriptulova, O.
    Salido, M. P.
    Martinez-Rus, F.
    Pradies, G.
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (04) : 2307 - 2315
  • [36] The influence of distinct techniques of local dental anesthesia in 9-to 12-year-old children: randomized clinical trial on pain and anxiety
    de Camargo Smolarek, Priscila
    da Silva, Leonardo Siqueira
    Martins, Paula Regina Dias
    da Cruz Hartman, Karen
    Bortoluzzi, Marcelo Carlos
    Chibinski, Ana Claudia Rodrigues
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (06) : 3831 - 3843
  • [37] Evaluation of EMLA cream with microneedle patches in palatal anesthesia in children: a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Babakurd, Farah M.
    Azzawi, Shadi K.
    Alkhouli, Muaaz
    Al-Nerabieah, Zuhair
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [38] A digital intervention using virtual reality helmets to reduce dental anxiety of children under local anesthesia and primary teeth extraction: A randomized clinical trial
    Du, Qin
    Ma, Xinru
    Wang, Shasha
    Zhou, Shiyu
    Luo, Chunmei
    Tian, Kun
    Fei, Wei
    Liu, Xianghong
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [39] Safety and Efficacy of Needle-free Powder Lidocaine Delivery System in Adult Patients Undergoing Venipuncture or Peripheral Venous Cannulation A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
    Zempsky, William T.
    Schmitz, Michael L.
    Meyer, James M.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2016, 32 (03) : 211 - 217
  • [40] A randomized controlled trial of buffered lidocaine for local anesthetic infiltration in children and adults with simple lacerations
    Fatovich, DM
    Jacobs, IG
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 17 (02) : 223 - 228