Tax reduction, technological progress, and energy efficiency improvement: A quasi-natural experiment from China

被引:21
作者
Cui, Yadong [1 ]
Jiang, Yaohui [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Zhaowen [2 ]
Xu, Su [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Econ & Adm, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Coll Business, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[3] 100 Wudong Rd, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
关键词
Tax reduction; Technological progress; VAT reform; Energy efficiency; VALUE-ADDED TAX; INVESTMENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2023.04.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Tax reduction is an important way for governments to conduct macroeconomic reg-ulation and may improve energy efficiency by incentivizing technological progress in firms. Based on the exogenous impact of VAT reform in China, this study constructs a difference-in-differences model using industrial firms, pollution and patent data to investigate the impact and mechanism of tax reduction on firms' energy efficiency. The empirical results show that: (1) Tax reduction can significantly improve the firms' energy efficiency by 6.3%, and this effect is increasing over time. (2) Mechanistic analysis shows that capital renewal, energy use restructuring and technological innovation are important ways for enterprises to improve energy efficiency. (3) Firm-level heterogene-ity analysis shows that tax reduction has a stronger energy efficiency improvement effect on firms with low financing costs, high market share, and receiving government subsidies. Regional heterogeneity analysis shows that firms located in regions with high marketization and low tax effort are more likely to benefit from tax reduction. This study provides theoretical and empirical support for energy efficiency improvements achieved by tax reduction, and provides an important reference for the optimal design of tax reduction policies. (c) 2023 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 633
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Power industry restructuring and eco-efficiency changes: A new slacks-based model in Malmquist-Luenberger Index measurement [J].
Arabi, Behrouz ;
Munisamy, Susila ;
Emrouznejad, Ali ;
Shadman, Foroogh .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 68 :132-145
[2]   Does environmental information disclosure improve energy efficiency? [J].
Bu, Caiqi ;
Zhang, Kaixia ;
Shi, Daqian ;
Wang, Shuyu .
ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 164
[3]   Investment in renewable energy resources, sustainable financial inclusion and energy efficiency: A case of US economy [J].
Chen, Huangxin ;
Shi, Yi ;
Zhao, Xin .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2022, 77
[4]   Internal financial constraints and firm productivity in China: Do liquidity and export behavior make a difference? [J].
Chen, Minjia ;
Guariglia, Alessandra .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2013, 41 (04) :1123-1140
[5]   Tax Policy and Lumpy Investment Behaviour: Evidence from China's VAT Reform [J].
Chen, Zhao ;
Jiang, Xian ;
Liu, Zhikuo ;
Serrato, Juan Carlos Suarez ;
Xu, Daniel Yi .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2023, 90 (02) :634-674
[6]   Taxation and Enterprise Innovation: Evidence from China's Value-Added Tax Reform [J].
Ding, Ke ;
Xu, Helian ;
Yang, Rongming .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (10)
[7]   Can financial inclusion facilitate carbon neutrality in China? The role of energy efficiency [J].
Dong, Jiajia ;
Dou, Yue ;
Jiang, Qingzhe ;
Zhao, Jun .
ENERGY, 2022, 251
[8]   Export to elude [J].
Fan, Haichao ;
Liu, Yu ;
Qiu, Larry D. ;
Zhao, Xiaoxue .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 127
[9]   Can importing improve the energy efficiency? Theory and evidence from Chinese industrial firms [J].
He, Ling-Yun ;
Huang, Geng .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2023, 83 :451-469
[10]  
He WD, 2017, J SCI IND RES INDIA, V76, P17