Implementing Artificial Neural Network-Based Gap Acceptance Models in the Simulation Model of a Traffic Circle in SUMO

被引:2
作者
Bagheri, Mohammad [1 ]
Bartin, Bekir [1 ]
Ozbay, Kaan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ozyegin Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] NYU, Dept Civil & Urban Engn, Brooklyn, NY USA
[3] NYU, Ctr C2SMART, Brooklyn, NY USA
关键词
operations; calibration; validation; microscopic traffic simulation; multi-agent simulation; simulation; BEHAVIOR; DRIVERS;
D O I
10.1177/03611981231167420
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The impact of various operational and design alternatives at roundabouts and traffic circles can be evaluated using microscopic simulation tools. Most microscopic simulation software utilizes default underlying models for this purpose, which may not be generalized to specific facilities. Since the effectiveness of traffic operations at traffic circles and roundabouts is highly affected by the gap rejection-acceptance behavior of drivers, it is essential to accurately model drivers' gap acceptance behavior using location-specific data. The objective of this paper was to evaluate the feasibility of implementing an artificial neural network (ANN)-based gap acceptance model in SUMO, using its application programming interface. A traffic circle in New Jersey was chosen as a case study. Separate ANN models for one stop-controlled and two yield-controlled intersections were trained based on the collected ground truth data. The output of the ANN-based model was then compared with that of the SUMO model, which was calibrated by modifying the default gap acceptance parameters to match the field data. Based on the results of the analyses it was concluded that the advantage of the ANN-based model lies not only in the accuracy of the selected output variables in comparison to the observed field values, but also in the realistic vehicle crossings at the uncontrolled intersections in the simulation model.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 239
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]   An alternative approach for modelling and simulation of traffic data: artificial neural networks [J].
Kalyoncuoglu, SF ;
Tigdemir, M .
SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY, 2004, 12 (05) :351-362
[22]   Statistical methods versus neural networks in transportation research: Differences, similarities and some insights [J].
Karlaftis, M. G. ;
Vlahogianni, E. I. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 19 (03) :387-399
[23]   Modeling aggressive driver behavior at unsignalized intersections [J].
Kaysi, Isam A. ;
Abbany, Ali S. .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2007, 39 (04) :671-678
[24]  
Law A.M., 2000, SIMULATION MODELING
[25]  
Leite B., 2019, P INT C INT TRANSP S, P18
[26]   PROBABILISTIC DELAY MODEL AT STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTION [J].
MADANAT, SM ;
CASSIDY, MJ ;
WANG, MH .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1994, 120 (01) :21-36
[27]   Analysis of Gap Acceptance Behavior for Unprotected Right and Left Turning Maneuvers at Signalized Intersections using Data Mining Methods: A Driving Simulation Approach [J].
Mafi, Somayeh ;
Abdelrazig, Yassir ;
Doczy, Ryan .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2018, 2672 (38) :160-170
[28]   Dynamic Modeling of Performance Indices for Planning of Sustainable Transportation Systems [J].
Maheshwari, Pankaj ;
Khaddar, Romesh ;
Kachroo, Pushkin ;
Paz, Alexander .
NETWORKS & SPATIAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 16 (01) :371-393
[29]   Estimation of Critical Gap for Through Movement at Four Leg Uncontrolled Intersection [J].
Maurya, Akhilesh Kumar ;
Amin, Harsh J. ;
Kumar, Arvind .
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION METHODOLOGIES FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES (11TH TPMDC) SELECTED PROCEEDINGS, 2016, 17 :203-212
[30]  
Maze T.H., 1981, Transportation Research Record, P8