Conceptualizing Industry 4.0 readiness model dimensions: an exploratory sequential mixed-method study

被引:66
作者
Antony, Jiju [1 ]
Sony, Michael [2 ]
McDermott, Olivia [3 ]
机构
[1] Khalifa Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[2] Namibia Univ Sci & Technol, Mech & Marine, Windhoek, Namibia
[3] Natl Univ Ireland, Coll Sci & Engn, Galway, Ireland
关键词
Industry; 4; 0; Readiness model; implementation; Interviews; Surveys; DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION; SMART; IMPLEMENTATION; TECHNOLOGY; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1108/TQM-06-2021-0180
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeOrganizations use Industry 4.0 readiness models to evaluate their preparedness prior to the implementation of Industry 4.0. Though there are many studies on Industry 4.0 readiness models, the dimensions of readiness differ. Besides, there is no study empirically validating the readiness model in different sectors or types of organization. The purpose of this study is to conceptualize the dimensions of the Industry 4.0 readiness model and subsequently evaluate the criticality of these dimensions in manufacturing, service, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and large enterprises (LEs).Design/methodology/approachThe study uses an exploratory sequential mixed method design. In phase one, 37 senior managers participated through a purposive sampling frame. In phase two, 70 senior managers participated in an online survey.FindingsThe results of the study indicated that the Industry 4.0 readiness model has 10 dimensions. Further, the criticality of the dimensions as applied to different sectors and type of organizations is put forward. This study will help manufacturing, services, SMEs and LEs to evaluate Industry 4.0 readiness before commencing the deployment of Industry 4.0.Practical implicationsThe findings can be very beneficial for Industry 4.0 practitioners and senior managers in different organisations to understand what readiness dimensions need to be considered prior to implementation of Industry 4.0 technology.Originality/valueThis paper makes an attempt to conceptualize the Industry 4.0 readiness model and utilizes an exploratory mixed method for critically evaluating the dimensions related to the model.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 596
页数:20
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATIONS FOR ELECTRIC MOBILITY - WHAT CAN BE LEARNED FROM EXISTING BUSINESS MODEL PATTERNS? [J].
Abdelkafi, Nizar ;
Makhotin, Sergiy ;
Posselt, Thorsten .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2013, 17 (01)
[2]   Applying Industry 4.0 technologies in the COVID-19 sustainable chains [J].
Acioli, Carina ;
Scavarda, Annibal ;
Reis, Augusto .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 70 (05) :988-1016
[3]   Critical success factors (CSFs) for sustainable affordable housing [J].
Adabre, Michael Atafo ;
Chan, Albert P. C. .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 156 :203-214
[4]  
Aithal P.S., 2020, International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters (IJAEML), V4, P124, DOI DOI 10.2478/EMJ-2023-0017
[5]  
Allen IE., 2007, Qual Progr, V40, P64
[6]  
Allmendinger G, 2005, HARVARD BUS REV, V83, P131
[7]   An evaluation into the limitations and emerging trends of Six Sigma: an empirical study [J].
Antony J. ;
Sony M. ;
Dempsey M. ;
Brennan A. ;
Farrington T. ;
Cudney E.A. .
TQM Journal, 2019, 31 (02) :205-221
[8]   An Empirical Study Into Qualifications and Skills of Quality Management Practitioners in Contemporary Organizations: Results From a Global Survey and Agenda for Future Research [J].
Antony, Jiju ;
Sony, Michael .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2023, 70 (02) :478-494
[9]   An Empirical Study Into the Limitations and Emerging Trends of Six Sigma: Findings From a Global Survey [J].
Antony, Jiju ;
Sony, Michael ;
Gutierrez, Leopoldo .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 69 (05) :2088-2101
[10]  
Armstrong Michael., 2005, HDB MANAGEMENT LEADE