Integrating Categorization and Decision-Making

被引:3
作者
Zheng, Rong [1 ]
Busemeyer, Jerome R. [1 ]
Nosofsky, Robert M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, 1101 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
Categorization-decision; Exemplar model; Interference effect; Model comparison; Quantum cognition model; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/cogs.13235
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Though individual categorization or decision processes have been studied separately in many previous investigations, few studies have investigated how they interact by using a two-stage task of first categorizing and then deciding. To address this issue, we investigated a categorization-decision task in two experiments. In both, participants were shown six faces varying in width, first asked to categorize the faces, and then decide a course of action for each face. Each experiment was designed to include three groups, and for each group, we manipulated the probabilistic contingencies between stimulus, category assignments, and decision consequences. For each group, each participant received three different sequences of category response, category feedback, decision response, and decision feedback. We found that participants were only partially responsive in the appropriate directions to the contingencies assigned to each group. Comparisons of results from different sequences provided evidence for empirical interference effects of categorization on decisions. The empirical interference effect is defined as the difference between the probability of taking a hostile action in decision-alone conditions and the total probability of taking a hostile action in categorization-decision conditions. To test competing accounts for multiple empirical results, including two-stage choice probabilities and empirical interference effects, we compared a quantum cognition model versus a two-stage exemplar categorization model at both aggregate and individual levels. Using a Bayesian information criterion, we found that the quantum model provided an overall better model fit than the exemplar model. Although both models predicted empirical interference effects, the exemplar model was able to generate probabilistic deviation by incorporating category information of the first stage into the feature representation of the subsequent decision stage, while the quantum model produced interference effect by superposition, measurement, and quantum entanglement.
引用
收藏
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Approaches to Ethical Decision-Making
    Fornari, Alice
    JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2015, 115 (01) : 119 - 121
  • [22] The dynamics of competition and decision-making
    Morgan, Andrew J.
    Neal, Andrew
    Ballard, Timothy
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2024, 31 (06) : 2811 - 2822
  • [23] Integrated oncological treatment decision-making: Creating a practice of patient-centred decision-making
    van der Wal-huisman, Hanneke
    van Leeuwen, Barbara L.
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    van Nuenen, Floor M.
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Festen, Suzanne
    Welling, Lieke
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2025, 131
  • [24] Integrating salience and value in decision making
    Louie, Kenway
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (40) : 15853 - 15854
  • [25] Spherical Fuzzy Decision-Making Approach Integrating Delphi and TOPSIS for Package Tour Provider Selection
    Nguyen, Phi-Hung
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [26] Bidding strategy to support decision-making by integrating fuzzy AHP and regression-based simulation
    Chou, Jui-Sheng
    Anh-Duc Pham
    Wang, Hsin
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 35 : 517 - 527
  • [27] Integrating Patient Values into Evidence-Based Practice: Effective Communication for Shared Decision-Making
    Vranceanu, Ana-Maria
    Cooper, Cynthia
    Ring, David
    HAND CLINICS, 2009, 25 (01) : 83 - +
  • [28] Identification of Road Crash Severity Ranking by Integrating the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
    Trivedi, Priyank
    Shah, Jiten
    JOURNAL OF ROAD SAFETY-JRS, 2022, 33 (02): : 33 - 44
  • [29] When Are We More Ethical? A Review and Categorization of the Factors Influencing Dual-Process Ethical Decision-Making
    Warner, Clark H. H.
    Fortin, Marion
    Melkonian, Tessa
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2024, 189 (04) : 843 - 882
  • [30] Dealing with the Lack of Time for Detailed Shared Decision-making in Primary Care: Everyday Shared Decision-making
    Caverly, Tanner J.
    Hayward, Rodney A.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (10) : 3045 - 3049