Integrating Categorization and Decision-Making

被引:3
|
作者
Zheng, Rong [1 ]
Busemeyer, Jerome R. [1 ]
Nosofsky, Robert M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, 1101 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
Categorization-decision; Exemplar model; Interference effect; Model comparison; Quantum cognition model; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/cogs.13235
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Though individual categorization or decision processes have been studied separately in many previous investigations, few studies have investigated how they interact by using a two-stage task of first categorizing and then deciding. To address this issue, we investigated a categorization-decision task in two experiments. In both, participants were shown six faces varying in width, first asked to categorize the faces, and then decide a course of action for each face. Each experiment was designed to include three groups, and for each group, we manipulated the probabilistic contingencies between stimulus, category assignments, and decision consequences. For each group, each participant received three different sequences of category response, category feedback, decision response, and decision feedback. We found that participants were only partially responsive in the appropriate directions to the contingencies assigned to each group. Comparisons of results from different sequences provided evidence for empirical interference effects of categorization on decisions. The empirical interference effect is defined as the difference between the probability of taking a hostile action in decision-alone conditions and the total probability of taking a hostile action in categorization-decision conditions. To test competing accounts for multiple empirical results, including two-stage choice probabilities and empirical interference effects, we compared a quantum cognition model versus a two-stage exemplar categorization model at both aggregate and individual levels. Using a Bayesian information criterion, we found that the quantum model provided an overall better model fit than the exemplar model. Although both models predicted empirical interference effects, the exemplar model was able to generate probabilistic deviation by incorporating category information of the first stage into the feature representation of the subsequent decision stage, while the quantum model produced interference effect by superposition, measurement, and quantum entanglement.
引用
收藏
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating social power into the decision-making of cognitive agents
    Pereira, Goncalo
    Prada, Rui
    Santos, Pedro A.
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2016, 241 : 1 - 44
  • [2] Integrating Multicultural Competencies in Ethical Decision-Making with Immigrant Populations
    Attia, Mina
    Das, Bagmi
    Atiyeh, Shadin
    Browne-James, Letitia
    COUNSELING AND VALUES, 2023, 68 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [3] The Decision-Making Model is Determined by the Decision-Making Cost
    Yong, Tan
    SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION, 2013, 9 : 195 - 198
  • [4] Beyond cognitive rationality: integrating motivation and affect in human decision-making
    Ganuthula, Venkat Ram Reddy
    DECISION, 2024, : 531 - 544
  • [5] Interference effects of categorization on decision making
    Wang, Zheng
    Busemeyer, Jerome R.
    COGNITION, 2016, 150 : 133 - 149
  • [6] Sustainable Decision-Making in SMEs of the Textile Industry: Integrating Methodologies, Practices, and Barriers
    Naranjo, Israel
    de la Torre, Rocio
    Boza, Andres
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2025,
  • [7] Toward socially responsible agents: integrating attachment and learning in emotional decision-making
    Ben Moussa, Maher
    Magnenat-Thalmann, Nadia
    COMPUTER ANIMATION AND VIRTUAL WORLDS, 2013, 24 (3-4) : 327 - 334
  • [8] Integrating Metacognitive and Psychometric Decision-Making Approaches for Bank Customer Loyalty Measurement
    Jalali, Marjan S.
    Ferreira, Fernando A. F.
    Ferreira, Joao J. M.
    Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, Ieva
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2016, 15 (04) : 815 - 837
  • [9] Student progress decision-making in programmatic assessment: can we extrapolate from clinical decision-making and jury decision-making?
    Tweed, Mike
    Wilkinson, Tim
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [10] The Limitations of Decision-Making
    Walton, Paul
    INFORMATION, 2020, 11 (12) : 1 - 22