Promoting Port Emission Reduction: A Tripartite Evolutionary Game Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Yuan, Kebiao [1 ]
Wang, Xuefeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Inst Logist Sci & Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Coll Transport & Commun, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
air quality; marine; marine environment; ports and channels; seaports; CONTAINER TERMINALS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; MANAGEMENT; POLLUTION; STRATEGY; PIRAEUS;
D O I
10.1177/03611981221143108
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Port emission reduction (PER) has attracted more and more attention, and promoting PER involves multiple stakeholders. Therefore, based on the evolutionary game theory, this paper establishes a tripartite evolutionary game model involving the government, port enterprise, and port residents, to explore the key variables affecting the implementation of emission reduction measures by the port enterprise. It is found that, in the initial stage of PER, because of the huge emission reduction cost, the government's incentive policies and the potential losses brought by port residents' supervision are the driving forces to promote the port enterprises to implement emission reduction measures. In the intermediate stage and mature stage of the development of PER, with the development of emission reduction technology, the emission reduction cost of port enterprises will be reduced, and the incremental income after emission reduction will gradually make up for part of the input cost. At this time, the government can reduce or even cancel relevant subsidies and finally withdraw from the market, and the willingness of port residents to choose supervision will be reduced, then the whole tripartite evolutionary game has reached an evolutionary stable state. In addition, we also provide some management insights for policymakers based on the results of sensitivity analysis of relevant parameters affecting the evolution path of the tripartite game.
引用
收藏
页码:1367 / 1386
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Central environmental protection inspection and carbon emission reduction: A tripartite evolutionary game model from the perspective of carbon neutrality
    Zhang, Zhen-Hua
    Ling, Dan
    Yang, Qin-Xin
    Feng, Yan-Chao
    Xiu, Jing
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE, 2024, 21 (03) : 2139 - 2153
  • [2] A Tripartite Evolutionary Game on Promoting the Development of Nearly-Zero Energy Consumption Buildings in China
    Huang, Hong
    Yusoff, Wardah Fatimah Mohammad
    BUILDINGS, 2023, 13 (03)
  • [3] A tripartite evolutionary game analysis of Japan's nuclear wastewater discharge
    Liu, Jiaguo
    Wang, Xiaoye
    Tan, Zhijia
    Chen, Jihong
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 214
  • [4] Marine Ecological Governance Under New Media Environment: Tripartite Evolutionary Game and Simulation Analysis
    Gao, Lehua
    Yan, An
    Yin, Qiaorong
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [5] Port greenhouse gas emission reduction: Port and public authorities? implementation schemes
    Alamoush, Anas S.
    Olcer, Aykut, I
    Ballini, Fabio
    RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 43
  • [6] Tripartite evolutionary game analysis of governance mechanism in Chinese WEEE recycling industry
    Li, Bangyi
    Wang, Qixiang
    Chen, Baixue
    Sun, Ting
    Wang, Zhe
    Cheng, Yongbo
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 167
  • [7] A review of the port carbon emission sources and related emission reduction technical measures?
    Wang, Bei
    Liu, Qing
    Wang, Lei
    Chen, Yongjun
    Wang, Jisheng
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2023, 320
  • [8] Emission reduction with hybrid mechanisms in civil aviation: An evolutionary game approach
    Zhang, Peiwen
    Ding, Rui
    Wang, Yu
    Zhang, Qiaoyan
    Zhao, Lianzheng
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 11
  • [9] Research on evolutionary game and stability of port cooperation
    Yuan, Kebiao
    Wang, Xuefeng
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2024, 153 : 97 - 109
  • [10] Research on evolutionary game and stability of port cooperation
    Yuan, Kebiao
    Wang, Xuefeng
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2024, 153 : 97 - 109