Unlocking the double-dividend: Evaluating the impact of SO2 emissions trading scheme on firm's environmental and economic performance

被引:2
|
作者
Ren, Yayun [1 ]
Yu, Jian [1 ]
Zhang, Kunpeng [2 ]
Liu, Shuxin [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Guiyang 550025, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Lixin Univ Accounting & Finance, Sch Accounting, Shanghai 201620, Peoples R China
[3] South China Agr Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Guangzhou 510630, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Prov Key Lab Publ Finance & Taxat Big Da, Guangzhou 510320, Peoples R China
关键词
Emissions trading scheme; Environmental performance; Economic performance; Difference-in-differences; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; POLLUTION-ABATEMENT; EXPORTS EVIDENCE; REGULATIONS; COST; COMPETITIVENESS; INNOVATION; INDUSTRY; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.envres.2023.117963
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The optimal design of environmental instruments demands a balance between environmental enhancement and economic growth. Utilizing microdata from the China Environmental Statistics Database and the China Industrial Firm Database, this study employs the difference-in-differences (DD) methodology to explore the dual effects of the SO2 Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) on the environmental and economic performance of micro-firms. The findings suggest that: (1) The SO2 ETS not only induces emission reduction effects among firms in pilot areas but also improves their industrial added value. (2) The SO2 ETS exhibits heterogeneous impacts across firms of diverse ownership, export status, and size. (3) While the SO2 ETS prompts firms to advance technologically, boosting desulfurization capacities and subsequently enhancing total factor productivity, it also inadvertently results in companies offsetting some environmental compliance costs by curtailing employee wages.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Impact of SO2 Emissions Trading Scheme on Firm's Environmental Performance: A Channel from Robot Application
    Song, Jian
    Wang, Yijing
    Wang, Jing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (24)
  • [2] SO2 emissions trading and firm exports in China
    Liu, Donghua
    Ren, Shenggang
    Li, Wenming
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 109
  • [3] The impact of SO2 emissions trading scheme on pollution abatement and labor market for industrial enterprises in China
    Zhang, Weijie
    Zhang, Panpan
    Niu, Xiaodi
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2024, 11
  • [4] Does energy-consuming right trading have double dividend effect on firm's economic performance and carbon emission?
    Zhang, Qingjun
    Li, Jing
    Wang, Juan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (48) : 105595 - 105613
  • [5] The environmental and economic impact of the emissions trading scheme (ETS) in Vietnam
    Duy Nong
    Nguyen, Trung H.
    Wang, Can
    Quy Van Khuc
    ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 140
  • [6] Does the SO2 emissions trading scheme encourage green total factor productivity? An empirical assessment on China's cities
    Hou, Bingqing
    Wang, Bing
    Du, Minzhe
    Zhang, Ning
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (06) : 6375 - 6388
  • [7] Does the SO2 emissions trading scheme encourage green total factor productivity? An empirical assessment on China’s cities
    Bingqing Hou
    Bing Wang
    Minzhe Du
    Ning Zhang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 : 6375 - 6388
  • [8] Does energy-consuming right trading have double dividend effect on firm’s economic performance and carbon emission?
    Qingjun Zhang
    Jing Li
    Juan Wang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 105595 - 105613
  • [9] How to achieve both environmental protection and firm performance improvement: Based on China's carbon emissions trading (CET) policy
    Sun, Chuanwang
    Tie, Ying
    Yu, Lili
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 130
  • [10] Evaluating the impact of urban traffic investment on SO2 emissions in China cities
    Yang, Mian
    Ma, Tiemeng
    Sun, Chuanwang
    ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 113 : 20 - 27