Standardized PSMA-PET Imaging of Advanced Prostate Cancer

被引:2
|
作者
Seifert, R. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Gafita, A. [3 ]
Telli, T. [1 ,2 ]
Voter, Andrew [3 ]
Herrmann, K. [1 ,2 ]
Pomper, Martin [3 ]
Hadaschik, B. [2 ,4 ]
Rowe, Steven P. [3 ]
Fendler, W. P. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, Dept Nucl Med, Essen, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Essen, German Canc Consortium DKTK, Essen, Germany
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Div Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Univ Duisburg Essen, Dept Urol, Essen, Germany
[5] PET Comm German Soc Nucl Med, Gottingen, Germany
[6] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Nucl Med, Hufelandstr 55, D-45147 Essen, Germany
关键词
POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; RESPONSE EVALUATION; GA-68-PSMA-11; PET; TUMOR VOLUME; EXPRESSION; CRITERIA; VERSION; RECIST; MULTICENTER; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.07.005
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Imaging of advanced prostate cancer is a challenging task, as it requires longitudinal characterization of disease extent in a standardized way to enable appropriate treatment selection and evaluation of treatment efficacy. In the last years, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT has become the reference standard examination for patients with advanced prostate cancer. Together with the rise of PSMA-PET, standardized frameworks for the reporting of image findings have been proposed, eg, the Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE) and the structured reporting system for PSMA targeted PET imaging (PSMA-RADS) framework. Therefore, recent evidence on PSMA-PET derived tumor volume as useful a biomarker for outcome prognostication and related frameworks will be discussed in the article. The PROMISE framework recommends quantifying the tumor volume per-organ system, which accounts for the fact that the location of the metastases greatly influence its biological aggressiveness. In addition, changes in PSMAPET derived tumor volume have been shown to be promising biomarkers for response assessment. Limitations of PSMA-PET will also be discussed because the tumor volume might not always be suited for response assessment. As a pitfall of PSMA-based systems, decreasing PSMA-expression might erroneously be interpreted as response to therapy. Also, especially for patients with limited disease, the tumor volume might not be ideal for response assessment. Therefore, various frameworks have been introduced to objectively measure response to therapy with PSMA-PET. Amongst these, the PSMA-PET progression (PPP) criteria and the response evaluation criteria in PSMA (RECIP) are optimized for earlier and later phenotypes of advanced prostate cancer, respectively. Variables needed to determine PPP or RECIP outcome on PSMA-PET are recorded under the umbrella of PROMISE recommendations. In this article, various reporting and response assessment frameworks are explained and discussed. Also, recent evidence for the relevance of PSMAPET biomarkers for clinical management and outcome prognostication are shown. Semin Nucl Med 54:60-68 (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 68
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Current role of PSMA-PET imaging in the clinical management of prostate cancer
    Georgakopoulos, Alexander
    Bamias, Aristotle
    Chatziioannou, Sophia
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 15
  • [2] Prostate MRI and PSMA-PET in the Primary Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Cereser, Lorenzo
    Evangelista, Laura
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    Girometti, Rossano
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (16)
  • [3] PSMA PET imaging in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer
    Houshmand, Sina
    Lawhn-Heath, Courtney
    Behr, Spencer
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (12) : 3610 - 3623
  • [4] Current Clinical Applications of PSMA-PET for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment
    von Stauffenberg, Franz
    Poyet, Cedric
    Beintner-Skawran, Stephan
    Maurer, Alexander
    Schmid, Florian A.
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (24)
  • [5] PSMA PET in Imaging Prostate Cancer
    Tsechelidis, Ioannis
    Vrachimis, Alexis
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [6] [68Ga]PSMA-PET/CT-imaging bij de diagnostiek van prostaatkanker[68Ga]PSMA-PET/CT imaging in prostate cancer diagnosis
    André N. Vis
    Bernard Jansen
    Daniela E. Oprea-Lager
    Tijdschrift voor Urologie, 2018, 8 (1) : 10 - 17
  • [7] Quantitative PSMA-PET parameters in localized prostate cancer: prognostic and potential predictive value
    Andela, Stephanie Bela
    Amthauer, Holger
    Furth, Christian
    Rogasch, Julian M.
    Beck, Marcus
    Mehrhof, Felix
    Ghadjar, Pirus
    van den Hoff, Joerg
    Klatte, Tobias
    Tahbaz, Rana
    Zips, Daniel
    Hofheinz, Frank
    Zschaeck, Sebastian
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [8] PSMA-PET
    Denis, A.
    MEDECINE NUCLEAIRE-IMAGERIE FONCTIONNELLE ET METABOLIQUE, 2019, 43 (03): : 287 - 294
  • [9] The phytological future of prostate cancer staging: PSMA-PET and the dandelion theory
    Sathianathen, Niranjan J.
    Geurts, Nicolas
    Nair, Rajesh
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Lamb, Alastair D.
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2017, 13 (20) : 1801 - 1807
  • [10] PSMA Ligands for PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer
    Schwarzenboeck, Sarah M.
    Rauscher, Isabel
    Bluemel, Christina
    Fendler, Wolfgang P.
    Rowe, Steven P.
    Pomper, Martin G.
    Asfhar-Oromieh, Ali
    Herrmann, Ken
    Eiber, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2017, 58 (10) : 1545 - 1552