Green bioethics, patient autonomy and informed consent in healthcare

被引:6
|
作者
Resnik, David B. [1 ,3 ]
Pugh, Jonathan [2 ]
机构
[1] NIEHS, Off Deputy Director, Durham, NC USA
[2] Univ Oxford, Oxford Uehiro Ctr Pract Eth, Oxford, England
[3] NIEHS, Durham, NC 27709 USA
关键词
Informed Consent; Ethics-; Medical; Environment; Personal Autonomy; Politics; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1136/jme-2023-109404
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Green bioethics is an area of research and scholarship that examines the impact of healthcare practices and policies on the environment and emphasises environmental values, such as ecological sustainability and stewardship. Some green bioethicists have argued that healthcare providers should inform patients about the environmental impacts of treatments and advocate for options that minimise adverse impacts. While disclosure of information pertaining to the environmental impacts of treatments could facilitate autonomous decision-making and strengthen the patient-provider relationship in situations where patients have clearly expressed environmental concerns, it may have the opposite effect in other situations if makes patients feel like they are being judged or manipulated. We argue, therefore, that there is not a generalisable duty to disclose environmental impact information to all patients during the consent process. Providers who practice green bioethics should focus on advocating for system-level changes in healthcare financing, organisation and delivery and use discretion when bringing up environmental concerns in their encounters with patients.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 493
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] DID BIOETHICS MATTER? A HISTORY OF AUTONOMY, CONSENT, AND INTERSEX GENITAL SURGERY
    Reis, Elizabeth
    MEDICAL LAW REVIEW, 2019, 27 (04) : 658 - 674
  • [42] The reality of informed consent: empirical studies on patient comprehension-systematic review
    Pietrzykowski, Tomasz
    Smilowska, Katarzyna
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [43] How informed is our consent? Patient awareness of radiation and radical prostatectomy complications
    Lomas, Derek
    Ziegelmann, Matthewl
    Elliott, Daniel S.
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 45 (03): : 191 - 195
  • [44] “Informed” Consent: An Audit of Informed Consent of Cesarean Section Evaluating Patient Education and Awareness
    Kirane A.G.
    Gaikwad N.B.
    Bhingare P.E.
    Mule V.D.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2015, 65 (6) : 382 - 385
  • [45] INFORMED CONSENT UNDER THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON BIOMEDICINE AND THE UNESCO DECLARATION ON BIOETHICS
    Salako, Solomon E.
    MEDICINE AND LAW, 2011, 30 (01): : 101 - 113
  • [46] Patient satisfaction with an informed consent process
    Agre, P
    McKee, K
    Gargon, N
    Kurtz, RC
    CANCER PRACTICE, 1997, 5 (03) : 162 - 167
  • [47] Patient satisfaction and informed consent for surgery
    Hallock, Jennifer L.
    Rios, Rebeca
    Handa, Victoria L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 217 (02) : 181.e1 - 181.e7
  • [48] Informed consent and ethical exemptions
    Herrera, CD
    HUMAN ORGANIZATION, 1996, 55 (02) : 235 - 237
  • [49] Sublingual immunotherapy and patient informed consent
    Pawliczak, Rafal
    ALERGOLOGIA POLSKA-POLISH JOURNAL OF ALLERGOLOGY, 2019, 6 (02) : 43 - 48
  • [50] From informed to empowered consent
    Hagopian, Chelsea O. P.
    NURSING PHILOSOPHY, 2024, 25 (01)