Validation of automatically measured T1 map cortico-medullary difference (ΔT1) for eGFR and fibrosis assessment in allograft kidneys

被引:2
作者
Aslam, Ibtisam [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Aamir, Fariha [3 ]
Kassai, Miklos [1 ,2 ]
Crowe, Lindsey A. [1 ,2 ]
Poletti, Pierre-Alexandre [1 ,2 ]
de Seigneux, Sophie [4 ]
Moll, Solange [5 ]
Berchtold, Lena [4 ]
Vallee, Jean-Paul [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Univ Hosp Geneva, Serv Radiol, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva, Fac Med, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] COMSATS Univ Islamabad, Dept Elect Comp Engn, Med Image Proc Res Grp MIPRG, Islamabad, Pakistan
[4] Univ Hosp Geneva, Dept Med, Serv Nephrol, Geneva, Switzerland
[5] Univ Hosp Geneva, Inst Clin Pathol, Dept Pathol, Geneva, Switzerland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 02期
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
SEGMENTATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0277277
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
MRI T1-mapping is an important non-invasive tool for renal diagnosis. Previous work shows that Delta T1 (cortex-medullary difference in T1) has significant correlation with interstitial fibrosis in chronic kidney disease (CKD) allograft patients. However, measuring cortico-medullary values by manually drawing ROIs over cortex and medulla (a gold standard method) is challenging, time-consuming, subjective and requires human training. Moreover, such subjective ROI placement may also affect the work reproducibility. This work proposes a deep learning-based 2D U-Net (RCM U-Net) to auto-segment the renal cortex and medulla of CKD allograft kidney T1 maps. Furthermore, this study presents a correlation of automatically measured Delta T1 values with eGFR and percentage fibrosis in allograft kidneys. Also, the RCM U-Net correlation results are compared with the manual ROI correlation analysis. The RCM U-Net has been trained and validated on T1 maps from 40 patients (n = 2400 augmented images) and tested on 10 patients (n = 600 augmented images). The RCM U-Net segmentation results are compared with the standard VGG16, VGG19, ResNet34 and ResNet50 networks with U-Net as backbone. For clinical validation of the RCM U-Net segmentation, another set of 114 allograft kidneys patient's cortex and medulla were automatically segmented to measure the Delta T1 values and correlated with eGFR and fibrosis. Overall, the RCM U-Net showed 50% less Mean Absolute Error (MAE), 16% better Dice Coefficient (DC) score and 12% improved results in terms of Sensitivity (SE) over conventional CNNs (i.e. VGG16, VGG19, ResNet34 and ResNet50) while the Specificity (SP) and Accuracy (ACC) did not show significant improvement (i.e. 0.5% improvement) for both cortex and medulla segmentation. For eGFR and fibrosis assessment, the proposed RCM U-Net correlation coefficient (r) and R-square (R-2) was better correlated (r = -0.2, R-2 = 0.041 with p = 0.039) to eGFR than manual ROI values (r = -0.19, R-2 = 0.037 with p = 0.051). Similarly, the proposed RCM U-Net had noticeably better r and R-2 values (r = 0.25, R-2 = 0.065 with p = 0.007) for the correlation with the renal percentage fibrosis than the Manual ROI results (r = 0.3, R-2 = 0.091 and p = 0.0013). Using a linear mixed model, T1 was significantly higher in the medulla than in the cortex (p<0.0001) and significantly lower in patients with cellular rejection when compared to both patients without rejection and those with humoral rejection (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in T1 between patients with and without humoral rejection (p = 0.43), nor between the types of T1 measurements (Gold standard manual versus automated RCM U-Net) (p = 0.7). The cortico-medullary area ratio measured by the RCM U-Net was significantly increased in case of cellular rejection by comparison to humoral rejection (1.6 +/- 0.39 versus 0.99 +/- 0.32, p = 0.019). In conclusion, the proposed RCM U-Net provides more robust auto-segmented cortex and medulla than the other standard CNNs allowing a good correlation of Delta T1 with eGFR and fibrosis as reported in literature as well as the differentiation of cellular and humoral transplant rejection. Therefore, the proposed approach is a promising alternative to the gold standard manual ROI method to measure T1 values without user interaction, which helps to reduce analysis time and improves reproducibility.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Abedalla A, 2020, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2009.02805
  • [2] Multiparametric Assessment of Changes in Renal Tissue after Kidney Transplantation with Quantitative MR Relaxometry and Diffusion-Tensor Imaging at 3 T
    Adams, Lisa C.
    Bressem, Keno K.
    Scheibl, Sonja
    Nunninger, Max
    Gentsch, Andre
    Fahlenkamp, Ute L.
    Eckardt, Kai-Uwe
    Hamm, Bernd
    Makowski, Marcus R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (05)
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, 3D Slicer image computing platform
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, HOROS PROJECT
  • [5] Validation of the corticomedullary difference in magnetic resonance imaging-derived apparent diffusion coefficient for kidney fibrosis detection: a cross-sectional study
    Berchtold, Lena
    Friedli, Iris
    Crowe, Lindsey A.
    Martinez, Chantal
    Moll, Solange
    Hadaya, Karine
    de Perrot, Thomas
    Combescure, Christophe
    Martin, Pierre-Yves
    Vallee, Jean-Paul
    de Seigneux, Sophie
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 35 (06) : 937 - 945
  • [6] Diagnosis and assessment of renal fibrosis: the state of the art
    Berchtold, Lena
    Friedli, Iris
    Vallee, Jean-Paul
    Moll, Solange
    Martin, Pierre-Yves
    de Seigneux, Sophie
    [J]. SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2017, 147
  • [7] Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017
    Bikbov, Boris
    Purcell, Carrie
    Levey, Andrew S.
    Smith, Mari
    Abdoli, Amir
    Abebe, Molla
    Adebayo, Oladimeji M.
    Afarideh, Mohsen
    Agarwal, Sanjay Kumar
    Agudelo-Botero, Marcela
    Ahmadian, Elham
    Al-Aly, Ziyad
    Alipour, Vahid
    Almasi-Hashiani, Amir
    Al-Raddadi, Rajaa M.
    Alvis-Guzman, Nelson
    Amini, Saeed
    Andrei, Tudorel
    Andrei, Catalina Liliana
    Andualem, Zewudu
    Anjomshoa, Mina
    Arabloo, Jalal
    Ashagre, Alebachew Fasil
    Asmelash, Daniel
    Ataro, Zerihun
    Atout, Maha Moh'd Wahbi
    Ayanore, Martin Amogre
    Badawi, Alaa
    Bakhtiari, Ahad
    Ballew, Shoshana H.
    Balouchi, Abbas
    Banach, Maciej
    Barquera, Simon
    Basu, Sanjay
    Bayih, Mulat Tirfie
    Bedi, Neeraj
    Bello, Aminu K.
    Bensenor, Isabela M.
    Bijani, Ali
    Boloor, Archith
    Borzi, Antonio M.
    Camera, Luis Alberto
    Carrero, Juan J.
    Carvalho, Felix
    Castro, Franz
    Catala-Lopez, Ferran
    Chang, Alex R.
    Chin, Ken Lee
    Chung, Sheng-Chia
    Cirillo, Massimo
    [J]. LANCET, 2020, 395 (10225) : 709 - 733
  • [8] Automated renal segmentation in healthy and chronic kidney disease subjects using a convolutional neural network
    Daniel, Alexander J.
    Buchanan, Charlotte E.
    Allcock, Thomas
    Scerri, Daniel
    Cox, Eleanor F.
    Prestwich, Benjamin L.
    Francis, Susan T.
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2021, 86 (02) : 1125 - 1136
  • [9] State-of-the-Art Traditional to the Machine- and Deep-Learning-Based Skull Stripping Techniques, Models, and Algorithms
    Fatima, Anam
    Shahid, Ahmad Raza
    Raza, Basit
    Madni, Tahir Mustafa
    Janjua, Uzair Iqbal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2020, 33 (06) : 1443 - 1464
  • [10] New Magnetic Resonance Imaging Index for Renal Fibrosis Assessment: A Comparison between Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and T1 Mapping with Histological Validation
    Friedli, I.
    Crowe, L. A.
    Berchtold, L.
    Moll, S.
    Hadaya, K.
    de Perrot, T.
    Vesin, C.
    Martin, P. -Y.
    de Seigneux, S.
    Vallee, J. -P.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6